backtop


Print 83 comment(s) - last by doctor sam ada.. on Jun 20 at 8:47 AM


Pluto and its biggest moon, Charon  (Source: NASA)
Pluto gets new classification: Plutoid

After being demoted from a planet to a dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) two years ago, the IAU has announced the term "plutoid" will be given to Pluto and similar dwarf planets.  Members of the IAU argued amongst themselves for two years, confused on how to classify dwarf stars like Pluto.  

Only dwarfs orbiting further than Neptune can be classified as a plutoid, and they must also circle the sun and be large enough to have their own gravitational field.  Pluto's permanent classification as a plutoid now means Neptune is the outermost planet in Earth's solar system; one complete orbit around the sun takes almost 165 years.

"Plutoids are celestial bodies in orbit around the sun at a distance greater than that of Neptune that have sufficient mass for their self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that they assume a hydrostatic equilibrium (near-spherical) shape, and that have not cleared the neighborhood around their orbit," said the IAU.

Pluto and Eris remain the only plutoids at the moment, but astronomers expect to find other small bodies that meet the qualifications to be a plutoid.

The controversy over Pluto's planet status has been strong for years, and the IAU-created plutoid classification most likely will not end the debate.  In fact, it is unlikely the debate regarding Pluto's status and what it should be classified as will never end, and defining it as a "plutoid" will only add fuel to the fire.

Many astronomers remain angry that Pluto, considered a planet for around 70 years, could have its status demoted so easily by the IAU.  Text book publishers and teachers must now begin to teach students that Pluto lost its planet status and is now a plutoid, along with describing the new classification.

The IAU has been the sole organization responsible for classifying all planetary bodies for more than a decade.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: But Wait;
By Digimonkey on 6/13/2008 2:15:19 PM , Rating: 2
Actually I don't think that's even a possible scenario. The planets have to have more mass than there moons to keep moons in their gravitational pull. If two objects have almost identical mass, but some how have intersecting gravitational fields, they would eventually separate from each other.


RE: But Wait;
By Screwballl on 6/14/2008 3:52:17 PM , Rating: 2
So what is to say that it is not possible to have another planet following the same exact (or close) path as Earth except on the exact opposite side of our sun? A place where the two gravities balance each other out and keep each other on opposite sides of Sol always. Until we get a telescope on/around Mars or Venus to keep an eye on that area, we will not know.


RE: But Wait;
By BMFPitt on 6/17/2008 2:22:20 PM , Rating: 2
And everyone whole lives there has a goatee.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki