backtop


Print 61 comment(s) - last by Mousekill.. on Jul 1 at 12:27 PM


The Raven is each launched by hand by soldiers on the ground. It is small and lightweight, made out styrofoam, though it has a tough kevlar skin.  (Source: Newsweek/Xaquin G.V.)

The UAVs, including the Raven coordinate Apache strikes -- in this case on a car.  (Source: Newsweek/Xaquin G.V)
Against a civilian enemy that can strike anywhere UAVs are rewriting the book on reconnaissance and military strikes by offering a view of the battlefield at all times.

Every day in Iraq and Afghanistan, dozens Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVS) hover in the skies stalking their enemy.  Some simply snap pictures; others carry out far more deadly missions.  But cumulatively they are opening a new high tech chapter in the way America wages war.

Duke of Wellington, conqueror of Napoleon at Waterloo and a savvy tactician once noted, "The whole art of war consists of getting at what is on the other side of the hill."

However, the changing face of war is not merely in defeating the enemy -- it’s also in minimizing civilian casualties. Lt. Col. Scott Williams leads a group of Apache helicopters which blow up buildings or "service targets" in military speak with Hellfire missiles. 

Last week in Sadr City, one of the most dangerous cities in Iraq, insurgents fired rockets at the U.S. protected Green Zone.  A UAV spotted the rocket militia in an apartment block.  Williams’ team moved in for the kill.  Then, the UAV spotted children running into and out of the building, playing. 

The strike was called off, and the children who would likely have been killed were safe.  The Apaches instead rained fire down on the rocket launch site that the militia had mostly deserted, killing a few remaining members.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars consist largely of raiding insurgent houses and tracking armed militias.  UAVs, including the ultra-small model airplane size Raven, are invaluable in finding the enemy, checking for civilians in the line of fire, and assessing the enemy's combat readiness.  The Army is even using the drones to look for disturbed Earth to detect Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), a leading cause of war casualties.  Hundreds of the drones are patrolling Iraq at any given time.  Last month alone, the fleet of drones logged 46,450 hours.

GPS and satellite imagery also offer valuable battlefield information, but can only get so close. The UAVs can do an unprecedented level of tracking, including in locations too dangerous to send soldiers.  Some of the drones such as the Predator can send images as far as Germany or Nevada for expert analysis.  And commanders are realizing their utility; Lt. Col. Paul V. Marnon, a battalion commander for the 3CAB and Apache commander states, "We can see into an alleyway, see teams organizing an attack."

The UAV revolution has occurred in the last five years.  When the devices were first deployed in Iraq at the start of the invasion, they were scoffed at as toys.  Now, Marnon says 90 percent of his teams' kills are assisted by UAVs. 

Defense Secretary Robert Gates is frustrated that the U.S. can't deploy UAVs fast enough.  Said Gates in a recent speech, "I've been wrestling for months to get more intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets into the theater. Because people were stuck in the old ways of doing things, it's been like pulling teeth."

With his commanders frantically requesting UAV support, Gates pushed through a $240 million boost in spending on reconnaissance surveillance craft.  This will include manned fly overs by civilian contractors as a stop-gap measure.

The UAVs have been around for a long time and are just now starting to earn their dues.  In the past, manned aircraft always stole the attention and funding.  The drone was born at the Van Nuys plant of the Radioplane Co. in the U.S.  The plant in 1944 developed radio controlled drones for surveillance.  From there the drones were sullied into a number of unglamorous purposes including target practice and as decoys.

In 1960, a Japanese-American put a camera on the drones.  After the U2 spy plane crash and the Cuban missile crisis, the government finally took notice.  Ryan-Teledyne deployed over 1,000 of its Firebee drones to Vietnam, taking pictures and jamming radar.  After the war, though, the drones program took a nose dive. 

The Army launched a massive program to develop an advanced drone known as Aquila, but in the end the incredibly expensive device was so loaded it could hardly fly and regularly crashed.  The drones cost $3 million each and the total program totaled to $1 billion.

The Israelis developed cheaper, lighter drones known as the Pioneer which helped in the first Gulf War.  An enemy unit even surrendered to the drone, a first.  However, the drones were too noisy and warned the enemy of their approach. 

When trying to design more efficient models, former CIA commander Jim Woosley approached the Air Force and they told him it would cost $500 million and six years.  He found instead a brilliant Israel Expert formerly working for the Pentagon named Abe Karem, who offered to design his drone in 6 months for only $5 million.

The resulting drone was incredibly useful and won quick support.  Named the Gnat, it shot impressive video.  Soon a modified version, the Predator was equipped with missiles, adding assault to its repertoire.  Many improvements helped to save the Predator from possibly being a dud.  GPS was added. The Hellfire missile, previously made to shoot up over trees, was modified to shoot down, and had a sheathing added which scattered into razor blades, killing enemies and optimally destroying unarmored vehicles.  On November 5, 2003, one of the modified missiles hit an SUV filled with Al Qaeda operatives, leaving the vehicle's oil pan as the only identifiable remains.

Now a new heavier duty, lesser-known model known as the Reaper, is on duty in Iraq.  It has four Hellfire missiles aboard and two 500-lb bombs.  The various armed drones are piloted remotely from Nevada and California, allowing pilots to live normal civilian lives and stay at home with their families when the work day is done -- after killing some terrorists.  Many of the smaller drones, which make up much of the 1,500 drones in Iraq and Afghanistan, are piloted by Marines and soldiers on the battlefront, though.

The drones are battery powered and made of Styrofoam protected in a Kevlar coat.  They weigh only 5 lbs and cost only $35,000 to produce.  They can easily be launched with a flick of the wrist, just like the average model plane.  Special certification is needed to fly larger craft; Sgt. Chris Hermann, 24, is among those certified and he flies them from a padded chair safe in a U.S. military base in the Green Zone.  He states, "Yeah, middle of the desert, aircon and a padded seat, there are worse jobs in Iraq.  We all joke about it.  A monkey can do this job, this bird flies itself, it lands itself."

On bad weather days, Hermann and his buddies stay inside and play Battlefield 2, Call of Duty 4 or The Underground.  He says the drone is like an Atari game -- really basic.  The drones have been invaluable in coordinating airstrikes.  Insurgents have learned to fear the buzz of the drones, which can't always be heard until they're nearby.  Unfortunately, the drones have also led to airstrikes that have killed civilians.  In a sort of grimly ironic jest, Iraqi mothers now warn their children, "Obey or the 'buzz' will come after you."

With more drones and better technology, though, the armed forces are working to reduce civilian casualties.  However, many remain skeptical about efforts such as Northrop-Grumman's $635 million contract to build an unmanned X-47B bomber for the Navy.  And with upcoming debate over fully autonomous killing war robots, both in the sky and on the ground that should be technically feasible within a couple decades, the issue is sure to remain.

However, whether you support or oppose them, the UAVs have had an undeniable effect on the war.  And largely they have helped to give the U.S. soldiers an edge over a shadowy civilian army that would otherwise have them at a disadvantage.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

UNNERVING
By JonnyDough on 6/9/2008 8:16:26 AM , Rating: 2
I find it VERY unnerving that we can be so dehumanized that we can sit and kill people as if it's a video game. I am anti-religious, but I have some serious moral issues with this. Am I the only one? When did we stop valuing human life? A life is a life is a life. Who are we to put ourselves before others? Does nobody else see the problem with this? I label you a terrorist, therefore you must die. I label you a communist, therefore you must be hung for treason. America is so lost, it's not even funny. We are repeating history and don't even realize it. Our media and politicians will have us believing anything. How is it that we've been so lulled to sleep? The end of this article states it's a "civilian army." Therefore, why are we killing civilians? How do you label a man as an enemy and then how do you justify killing him? I have never been harmed by an Iraqi that I know of, if he hurt my family, I would surely shoot him. Iraq is nothing but an INVASION/OCCUPATION that many SOLDIERS have even turned against. There are websites of soldiers that are against this war. Why haven't we impeached our president, who OBVIOUSLY entered the white house with an AGENDA. I am sickened and disgusted by my fellow Americans. We have become VERY ethnocentric. If you don't know what that is, I beg you to look it up.




RE: UNNERVING
By shadowfunhaus on 6/10/2008 9:11:56 AM , Rating: 2
Lets get one thing straight. The Terrorists favorite pasttime is mortaring Americans from portable launching platforms that they aren't anywhere near. When we catch them, We PAY them to live in our jails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Because in Islam the male is the "bread winner". so we pay them $250-300 a month to be in our jail, plus food and AC and Electric!!!!!!! When their dining facility breaks, our guards have to give up theirs to the prisoners and eat MREs. When the prisobners AC breaks, the guards give up theirs, and thats even if they get one. And even with all these luxuries, they still try to kill us everyday. Try talking to them, and your not even human to them. Anyone who doesn't believe what they do deserves to die. We help their kids more than they do! We build schools and set up clinics all the time.

I have one question for you Jonny. Are you sexist? Do you just not like Girls going to school, getting educations, and being able to be something other than chattel?

We put more value on human life than anyone else in the world. Look at Africa, where the "benevolent" U.N. has left a legacy of rape and torture that is simply sickening. Their inspectors are Pedophiles, their troops are rapists, and their officers shoot or torture those who complain. And they still rail against our "human rights" violations!! We never signed the Geneva convention, but we are the only country that actually holds its Armed Forces to it. It's the first predeployment briefing most of us get, and they tell us exactly what will happen if we violate it.

Besides, The UAVs help prevent alot of civilian casualties because they can get closer than anything else. And trust me, any predator pilot who killed and noncombatant by accident beat himself up about it for a long time.


RE: UNNERVING
By Mousekill on 7/1/2008 12:24:35 PM , Rating: 2
I don't understand how the location of a person's seat determines how a life is valued. It's the person in that seat that makes that value judgement. The situations are still very real, and the operators know this. Nobody is advocating killing civilians. The term "terrorist" is not very abstract or arbitrarily assigned in Iraq. Terrorists are the people blowing up mosques, schools and markets. And if it's neccesary to kill some of these terrorists in order to prevent them from killing Americans or Iraqi civilians, it seems like a bigger moral failing to allow such actions to continue than it is to kill the terrorist.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki