Print 88 comment(s) - last by Crassus.. on Jun 6 at 2:29 PM

Seagate says it will target enterprise customers with its first SSD

Seagate doesn’t currently have any drives in the SSD market. Seagate currently is one of the largest makers of traditional hard drives and while it foresees a time when the solid state drive (SSD) is a better value than traditional HDDs; that time is not now.

Seagate announced that next year it will double its highest capacity traditional HDD to 2TB and will introduce its first SSD. CEO Bill Watkins says Seagate will first target enterprise customers with its SSDs where the benefits of lower power consumption and faster data access will be most welcome. The enterprise environment will also be willing to pay the premium SSDs will still demand whereas the majority of the consumer market is not willing to pay the premium at this time says Seagate.

PC World quotes Watkins saying, “SSDs are not price-competitive yet.” The cost per gigabyte for SSDs isn’t expected to come down for several years. Watkins believes that SSDs will become a focus for Seagate when the cost per gigabyte of SSD storage is around $0.10.

Currently, the cost per gigabyte for the average SSD is about $3.58 per gigabyte according to Krishna Chander, an analyst at iSuppli. There are problems with SSDs to be tackled over the next few years other than price. The typical SSD still has a storage capacity too low for most users and the SSD lifespan is short compared to a traditional HDD.

The answer to the problem of durability may lie in using the SSD for data reading and fast access to commonly used files and having less frequently used stuff moved off to a HDD for more permanent storage according to some. Despite the fact that Seagate doesn’t currently sell SSDs, it does own several patents that cover technology currently used in many SSDs on the market.

In April 2008 Seagate announced it was going to begin filing patent infringement suits against SSD makers who were using its patented technology in their products with the first suit filed against STEC.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Who cares
By elpresidente2075 on 5/30/2008 3:41:08 PM , Rating: 2
I have 4 HDs ranging from 40GB-300GB none of which are more than 1/4th full

And I have 2 320's and a 250 that are all 75-90% full, plus an 80 that's nearly 50% (between 3 computers), and a project that I'm working on will fill that last bit of space in mere moments.

The raw performance of these drives is less important than their sheer capaciousness, as one is a media center and another is my main desktop, both of which would suffer severly from an EXTREMELY loud 10k-15k drive. Besides, many of the new 300-500 GB drives with 16-32MB of cache are just as fast or faster than the Raptors (not VelociRaptor - that's a whole other story) without all the noise and much better power/heat characteristics plus much better longevity than any consumer-level 15k drive would be able to achieve.

Personally, I'd like to see an SSD for my laptop for every reason ever mentioned to buy an SSD. But, like every other normal person, they're WAY too expensive to even be considered. The most I'll pay/GB on an SSD will be $1, as that'll make a 60GB $60, and be a direct replacement for my current setup within a decent price envelope. Unfortunately that probably won't be until '10 or '11, so I'll have a whole new lappy by then, and my GB req's will be much higher by that time.

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki