backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by Kim Leo.. on Jun 20 at 6:45 AM


Phoenix Project Manager Barry Goldstein and Principal Investigator Peter Smith anxiously await data from the Phoenix probe on Sunday.  (Source: NASA/JPL-Calech)

An artist's montage of the Phoenix probe and its landing. True to the picture, the probe landed intact.  (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)

The first images from the Phoenix spacecraft have been send back, confirming polygonal ground patterns resembling those on permafrost ground on Earth. (color is false)  (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
No metric metric conversion or other snafus could foil the landing of the Phoenix lander

After a few terrifying moments on Sunday, NASA scientists received signals from the Phoenix spacecraft.  It had landed safely on the surface of Mars.

The lander promises to not only prepare for the ongoing efforts to send humans to Mars, but also will further the investigation of the possibility that life once existed on Mars.  Before it could complete its mission, though, it had to land.  After months of travel through the dark depths of space, it reached the fringe of Mars' atmosphere and began a plunge referred to as "seven minutes of terror" by NASA.  The seven minute entry has been a punishing one on past satellites -- of the 11 objects which various nations have tried to land on Mars, only 5 survived.

Safely landing requires aeroshell breaking, using a heat resistant shield to create friction with the atmosphere slowing its descent from catastrophic speeds.  The side effect is the shield heats to thousands of degrees, increasing the chance of failures.  After sufficiently reducing the speed, a parachute is deployed.  This is yet another phase prone to past failures.  Finally, the probe must use its retrorockets to gently touch down the surface, to prevent impact damage.

Unfortunately there's no possibility for an Earth-driven landing sequence -- Mars is 15 minutes away from the Earth in radio signal time.  So the craft had to land autonomously.  Shortly before 5:00 pm PDT on Sunday, NASA scientists breathed a collective sigh of relief when they received thumbs up signals from the satellite.

Barry Goldstein, Phoenix project manager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a statement Sunday that while the most difficult part perhaps -- landing -- had been conquered, challenges lay ahead.  Said Goldstein, "We've passed the hardest part and we're breathing again, but we still need to see that Phoenix has opened its solar arrays and begun generating power."

Then late on Sunday, after two hours of silence, the lander started sending back its first pictures, which confirmed that its solar arrays needed for the mission's energy supply had unfolded properly, and masts for the stereo camera and weather station had swung into vertical position.

Ed Sedivy, Phoenix program manager at Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company enthusiastically stated, "Phoenix is an amazing machine, and it was built and flown by an amazing team. Through the entire entry, descent and landing phase, it performed flawlessly.  The spacecraft stayed in contact with Earth during that critical period, and we received a lot of data about its health and performance. I'm happy to report it's in great shape."

The spacecraft landed in a crater in the polar region, which is expected to hold permafrost.  The probe carries instruments to "taste and sniff" the polar ice.  Peter Smith of the University of Arizona, Tucson, principal investigator for the Phoenix mission commented on the initial pictures stating, "We see the lack of rocks that we expected, we see the polygons that we saw from space, we don't see ice on the surface, but we think we will see it beneath the surface. It looks great to me."

The next major milestone will be the use of the lander's 7.7 foot robotic arm, which will occur on Tuesday.  The arm contains instruments to dig into the soil and test the permafrost to see if it ever melts and also to see if it has certain chemicals necessary for life as we know it.

The Phoenix lander's hardware, true to its name rose from the ashes of a discarded program.  In 1999 a lander built using most of the same hardware was lost during landing.  This caused a second launch, scheduled for 2001, to be cancelled and the additional hardware built for it to be put in storage.  NASA put the hardware to new use in 2002 for the Phoenix lander, following increased interest in the possibility of life on Mars and human mars exploration.

The mission is truly an international effort.  Outside the U.S. many partners including Canadian Space Agency; the University of Neuchatel, Switzerland; the universities of Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark; Max Planck Institute, Germany; the European Space Agency; and the Finnish Meteorological Institute, have contributed to the project.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

truly international..riiigght.
By GlassHouse69 on 5/26/2008 1:24:46 PM , Rating: 4
Hopefully, this will end the geek war of water on mars for DT forum posters.

nice to see that this is an international event. I imagine it is just like the international events like Iraq/Afghanistan. Europeans $5 dollars, US citizens, 20% of their combined income.




RE: truly international..riiigght.
By V3ctorPT on 5/26/08, Rating: -1
RE: truly international..riiigght.
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 5/26/2008 1:43:07 PM , Rating: 5
Look no further than the International Space Station to see that whenever there is a "multi-national" effort the U.S. makes up the majority and then some.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By V3ctorPT on 5/26/08, Rating: -1
RE: truly international..riiigght.
By freaqie on 5/26/08, Rating: -1
RE: truly international..riiigght.
By Carter642 on 5/26/2008 2:58:41 PM , Rating: 5
Err we spend way more on famine, drought, disease etc than we do on the space program.

That 'hotel' in space up there is just slightly important should we ever decide to do anything halfway ambitious in space. It's not like they're just sitting up there in a tin can saying 'gee this is fun'. The whole ISS project has been worth it if just for the experience of learning to build big things in space.

You have a sad lack of vision if you think that we're going to stick to spaceships that are small enough to stick on top of a rocket and land on earth when they come home.

It's rather sad that we spend so much on the military and so little on space. I mean really, you can buy four mars landers for the cost of a stealth bomber. With even 10% of the military budget NASA would be building subdivisions on the moon by now.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By desertvet on 5/26/2008 4:59:54 PM , Rating: 4
I agree, it’s a shame we have to spend so much on our military. But who else would save Europe’s ass every time they got invaded?


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By spuddyt on 5/26/2008 6:26:37 PM , Rating: 1
don't you mean, "stop them from invading each other" since we have spent a loooooooonnnnnnnnggggggg time doing just that (WW2 was.... oh yes, Germany against pretty much rest of europe to start with...)


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By V3ctorPT on 5/27/08, Rating: -1
By TheHarvester on 5/27/2008 5:37:24 AM , Rating: 5
Most of those loans were actually forgiven in the decade after WWII. And while American businesses did make inroads in the aftermath of WWII, the Marshall Plan and the billions of (1940's) dollars funneled into European democratic states to promote reconstruction (and of course contribute to the policy of containment in the earliest stages of the Cold War) were given with relatively few strings attached. Some of that money was used to purchase U.S. exports, but the majority was spent domestically.

In any case, I think it's great that the international community has supported the majority of the latest space programs, no matter what the percentages of funding are. Even if the States have to shoulder the burden of the majority of the funding, the important part is at least that we keep up the space research until we find something useful (new power sources, etc.) that can help subsidize the ballooning costs of space exploration.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 5/26/2008 1:52:02 PM , Rating: 2
After the NASA/Lockheed metric-to-imperial f**kup that was the Mars Polar Lander and Mars Climate Orbiter, JPL did as much it could to reduce cost. This included reusing the Lockheed frame for the second Mars Polar Lander.

However after watching the televised cast last night, it really seemed like NASA got a lot of foreign universities and work groups a chance to put stuff onboard in exchange for absorbing some of the cost. From what I've heard from my friends at NASA, Getty Lee's group, is that a lot of this mission was sort of a vindication that the JPL group could still do a low budget lander. It's a good thing they pulled it off, because the likelihood they'd get a third chance was almost non-existent.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By noirsoft on 5/26/2008 2:28:12 PM , Rating: 2
I didn't think Geddy Lee's probe landed until 2112.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By Clauzii on 5/26/2008 2:33:28 PM , Rating: 2
Probably got some new juicy fuel, invented 2089.


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 5/26/2008 2:33:54 PM , Rating: 2
Haha, when he's not writing books he flies spaceships. No joke :)


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By MC17 on 5/26/2008 3:07:25 PM , Rating: 2
And even then it'll be a Rush job.


By kyleb2112 on 5/26/2008 8:55:54 PM , Rating: 2
But there was that Rocinante launch to Cygus-X1. Could've dropped the probe then.
And if you get that one you are a true Rush geek.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By Gyres01 on 5/27/2008 12:00:34 PM , Rating: 2
Nice.......It's the Syrinx probe.


RE: truly international..riiigght.
By Kim Leo on 6/20/2008 6:45:10 AM , Rating: 2
"nice to see that this is an international event. I imagine it is just like the international events like Iraq/Afghanistan. Europeans $5 dollars, US citizens, 20% of their combined income. "

That is really stupid, first of all you can't compare these two things. US started it's own war against some country that didn't stand a chance, and FN didn't approve, so becuase the us says so you expect everyone to follow? As i said you can't compare it.

I'm from denmark and this case has been very interesting for us because the phoenix contains danish inventions wich where produced in denmark.

it's just so stupid to start saying such crap, EU have the LHC why dosn't US have one just as big if not bigger? they only have a 3km in diameter collider where the european is 27km in diameter.. I guess the US is more stuck on creationism while the real world is finding science. that is the kind of dumb conclusion I would make if i thought like you.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki