backtop


Print 58 comment(s) - last by zsdersw.. on Mar 11 at 7:10 AM

BIOS issues and other concerns are addressed

Anandtech was able to score a second session with Intel's Conroe and an overclocked AMD FX-60. Some concerns and issues were raised concerning the first test, so Anand addresses them with this update.

The performance picture with regards to Conroe hasn’t really changed all that much - on average we’re still seeing a bit over a 20% increase in performance over an overclocked Athlon 64 FX-60.  While it’s worth noting that these results should be taken with a grain of salt, we really were not able to determine any cause for suspicion based on Intel’s setups.  The machines were as clean as they could get, with the BIOS oversight having no tangible impact on most performance.

After this second round of tests, there doesn't appear to be anything malicious or underhanded going on Intel's part. The BIOS had little to no effect on performance and the Conroe still comes out on top. Now all we have to do is wait for AM2 Athlons.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

It's about time.
By exdeath on 3/9/2006 1:36:04 PM , Rating: 2
Wow this may be my first Intel CPU since the original Athlon Slot A 700 Mhz.

AMD has held the performance crown since then, loosing it briefly to Intel when the P4 crossed 3 Ghz, until the K7s arrived.




"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il

Related Articles
Conroe Benchmark Criticisms
March 8, 2006, 4:45 PM













botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki