Print 55 comment(s) - last by Adonlude.. on May 28 at 5:18 PM

Critics fear that citizens sleepwalk into the arms of Big Brother

The UK government wants a massive database to store the web, e-mail, and phone histories of every person in the country – and is unveiling new telecommunications legislation to implement it.

Technology is changing too fast, said a spokeswoman for the UK Home Office, and current progress is undermining law enforcement’s ability to obtain data and “use it to protect the public.”

Such legislation would update the country’s laws, giving the government and law enforcement officials an expanded ability to obtain communications records essential for counter-terrorism and fighting crime. Under the new legislation, law enforcement would receive a brand new, centralized database of communications records, giving officers a one-stop shop for comprehensive reports on a person’s communications activities.

Ross Anderson, chairman of think-tank Foundation for Information Policy Research, thinks that such a database would require network providers to undergo substantial redesigns of their networks. As a result, service providers “would simply move abroad” rather than play ball with the government.

“It's an enormous power grab by the Home Office, and to think it will become a reality is wishful thinking,” said Anderson.

Such a database would add a considerable amount of information to the country’s already large surveillance program, complementing controversial plans for a national Identity Register and corresponding ID card that were delayed to 2012.Together, with new face-recognition technology in surveillance cameras, and comprehensive national ID and communications databases, government officials would have the ability to take a seemingly intimate view into ordinary citizens’ lives, documenting previously anonymous data with startling efficiency.

Naturally, civil rights groups, IT experts, activists, and security professionals are concerned about the initiative – particularly given previous programs’ lack of effectiveness and the government’s spotty security record.

“This would give us serious concerns and may well be a step too far. We are not aware of any justification for the State to hold every UK citizen’s phone and internet records,” said assistant Information Commissioner Jonathan Bamford. “We have warned before that we are sleepwalking into a surveillance society.”

A communications database created per the proposal would be forced to record the almost 57 billion text messages and 3 billion e-mails sent annually in the UK, a security prospect that industry officials are concerned about attracting abuse.

“Given [ministers’] appalling record at maintaining the integrity of databases holding people’s sensitive data, this could well be more of a threat to [national] security, than a support,” said Shadow Home Secretary David Davis.

“Holding large collections of data is always risky - the more data that is collected and stored, the bigger the problem when the data is lost, traded or stolen,” said Bamford.

Government police and security forces would be able to access the database only for records authorized by court warrant.

Jamie Cowper, director of European marketing at security company PGP Corp., panned the idea.

“You've got to admire the government's gall in attempting to bring in yet another 'super-database' with public confidence still in tatters over recent lapses in data protection,” said Cowper.

PC World reports that the Internet Service Providers’ Association is taking a “wait-and-see” approach before it weighs in, but it expressed concern about modifications that ISPs would have to make to their businesses and infrastructure.

Home Office officials note that much of the information desired is already available, albeit spread across different companies. This creates an unnecessary time sink and hampers investigations, it said, and a new, central database would allow law enforcement and security officials to work more efficiently.

Full details will be released as part of a data communications bill set to be announced this November. Ministers have yet to see or approve the plans for inclusion in upcoming drafts.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Rediculous invasion of privacy
By Aloonatic on 5/22/2008 4:24:36 AM , Rating: 4
The only saving grace for UK citizens is the gross incompetence of our government and civil service.

There argument for these measures is because of this Al Quida bloke?

In 5 years (in the UK) Al has managed 1 successful attack on 7/7. Apart from that some muppets setting fire to them selves in Scotland and got the kicking they deserved from the natives and other tried to copy the 7/7 bombers in the underground and only ended up making bread.

I know I'm going to sound like one of the "tin-foil hat brigade" but does anyone take this Al-Quida thing seriously?

I know that you will if you lost someone in their few and far between attacks, and I feel for you, but they really haven't been that great a terror group.

The IRA managed to do things much better and more frequently.

If you were a terrorist and wanted to bring a country to a halt wouldn't you go about sabotaging the railways and motorways with the strategic use of concrete blocks and explosions on bridges and signalling gear?

And even if you want to go the old school blowing up buildings route, 15 year old girls are out doing you Al-Quida, over here in the UK.

Boy must Osama's face be red when he looks at the score board of terror as we near the half way point of 2008:

Teenage girls 1
The uber international terror group Al-Quida 0

And then my final point (this has turned into a longer rant than I expected, sorry)

What happens when all electronic coms are monitored completely?

"Terrorists" are going to stop using them, and the lack of information being found using this surveillance stream will be seen this way, not that they were never there, but that they have stopped using e-mail.

So they will have to assume that terrorists are meeting in public places, bars, cafes and such, so these places will have to be monitored, every public place wired for video and sound.

Then when this doesn't show up anything they must be meeting up in private and therefore every home will have to have video cameras and microphones installed.

I'm not going to hang around too much longer to find out what the next civil liberty that is going to be taken away from me in the name of the fight against terror but this is by no means the only reason to leave this once great now rather sad and pathetic cowering little country.

RE: Rediculous invasion of privacy
By jabber on 5/22/2008 7:52:41 AM , Rating: 4
I agree. I dont beleive in this Al-Q crap either. Its the big excuse the UK Govt has been looking for for taking away our rights.

Did we worry when the IRA was bombing us every other week? NO. We just ignored it and carried on as if nothing happened as best we could. A couple of days outrage in the papers and then back to normal. I dont give a stuff what Al-Q are up to. I dont care. Someone always has an axe to grind. If it wasnt them it would be someone else.

Has Al-Q taken away any of my rights? NO. Only the Govt has. We had the 7/7 attack and for a day or two the Govt was all about "they will never change our way of life and they will never take our freedom. About two weeks later a whole raft of restrictive and invasive legislation is drafted in. Would it stop terrorism? No. Would any of it stop a bomb? No. Would it give them far more powers and ability to delve into our private lives? Yes.

I personally dont know anyone in the UK that wakes up worried every morning about Al-Q. I worry more about getting stabbed by a ill-educated teenager in the street but nothing gets done about stopping that.

Its all a sham. Trouble is I dont think any of the political parties in the UK would want to dissolve all those powers if they managed to take over govt in the next election. Its too intoxicating.

It will start to happen elsewhere eventually. Guns wont stop it this time either.

"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki