Print 31 comment(s) - last by emmet.. on May 19 at 5:13 AM

Florida judge not amused, already told them once

A Florida judge denied an RIAA attempt to dismiss counterclaims filed against it in Atlantic v. Boyer yesterday, allowing all six of the complaints to proceed.

Last month, defendant Eva Boyer filed six counterclaims in response to a standard RIAA copyright-infringement suit filed against her by Atlantic, Warner Bros., UMG, and Sony BMG. She accused the RIAA of civil conspiracy, computer fraud, trespass, deception, extortion, and abuse of process – and each claim was upheld by United States District Judge Richard A. Lazzara.

Recording Industry vs. The People notes that Boyer’s claims are nearly identical to the five out of six surviving claims filed against the RIAA in UMG v. Del Cid, which settled in October of last year. Coincidentally, Atlantic v. Boyer and UMG v. Del Cid share the same presiding judge, in addition to the same counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendant.

Writing on Slashdot, Vandenberg & Feliu, LLP attorney Ray Beckerman, who coauthors Recording Industry vs. The People, says he underestimated the RIAA’s “chutzpah” for filing the same motion to dismiss a second time:

“I opined that ‘it is highly unlikely that the RIAA will make a motion to dismiss counterclaims,’ since I knew they'd be risking sanctions if they did,” wrote Beckerman under his alias, NewYorkCountryLawyer. “In essence [they] thumbed their nose at the judge, making the dismissal motion anyway.”

In its motion to dismiss, one of the RIAA’s claims (PDF) argued that Lazzara’s prior ruling in UMG v. Del Cid was “wrongly decided,” accusing the court of failing to heed proper burdens of proof, citing revised standards in Twombly v. Bell Atlantic. Lazzara disagreed, noting that a review of the case, and its resulting order, “reflects otherwise.”

Seemingly annoyed with the RIAA’s repeat claims, Lazzara denied the RIAA’s motion to dismiss the morning after it was filed – going so far as to tell Boyer to not worry about filing a response:

“Because the Court has previously resolved all of the issues raised in Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss,” wrote Lazzara, “and because the Court is not convinced that its prior decision was wrong, the Court needs no response from Defendant and the motion is due to be denied.”

The RIAA has ten days to answer Boyer’s counterclaims.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Our Hero
By MrBlastman on 5/7/2008 9:20:42 AM , Rating: 5
That judge is our Hero. Finally a voice of reason in the courtroom to stand against the RIAA.

Oh, and the picture is perfect :)

RE: Our Hero
By DASQ on 5/7/2008 10:47:08 AM , Rating: 3
He was an hero!

Nevar forget!

RE: Our Hero
By Mitch101 on 5/7/2008 10:52:47 AM , Rating: 5
I agree but I think this is more of a Florida Judge who who is paying attention and listening to details that does his job very well by seeing through the BS and understanding the root issues of the case. This one obviously does.

This Florida Judge obviously has a brain behind him and makes a lot of his peers look like there must be a lot of stupid/biased/careless in the field of Judging. I guess IT isn't the only field that receives dead weight and its good to see a Qualified Judge in the field handling such an important case.

RE: Our Hero
By Denigrate on 5/7/2008 1:21:11 PM , Rating: 4
Who appointed this guy? I mean come on, a Judge with common sense? We need to get the person who appointed him to do a review of the rest of our judges and clean house.

RE: Our Hero
By Mitch101 on 5/7/2008 1:33:48 PM , Rating: 3
I agree maybe video taping/broadcasting to local TV in court rooms should be mandatory this way we can crack down on bad Judges who let personal influence get in the way of upholding the laws.

RE: Our Hero
By Johnniewalker on 5/7/2008 2:34:18 PM , Rating: 5
In 1997 he was appointed by President Bill Clinton to serve as a United States District Judge.


RE: Our Hero
By Omega215D on 5/7/2008 5:18:19 PM , Rating: 1
Who ironically signed into law the DMCA. ;P

Still a good call compared to the judges appointed by our own curious george.

RE: Our Hero
By chrispyski on 5/7/2008 4:38:13 PM , Rating: 2
I gotta hand it to you DT, you have the best thumbnail images ever...

I mean, Statler and Waldorf, perfect picture!

(And yes, I am slightly ashamed that I remember their names)

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki