Print 25 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on May 4 at 11:42 AM

Ballmer says he won't pay a dime more than he thinks Yahoo is worth

In February 2008 Microsoft made an unsolicited offer to buy Yahoo for $44.6 billion in cash and stock options. Yahoo’s board of directors turned the offer down stating that the offer undervalued the company.

At the time the offer was tendered the $44.6 billion deal placed a 62% premium on what Yahoo stock was selling for. Since the initial offer was made and rejected much has transpired in the Microsoft/Yahoo saga with things taking a turn for the worst leaving Microsoft to consider a hostile takeover of Yahoo.

The Wall Street Journal reports that sources close to the deal say that as of yesterday Microsoft is leaning towards a hostile takeover attempt of Yahoo. According to the Wall Street Journal the announcement from Microsoft that it intends to pursue a hostile takeover could come as early as today.

Steve Ballmer offered no comment on when Microsoft would make its decision public and simply said, “With the right circumstances it'll happen. Without the right circumstances it won't happen.”

While Microsoft had said its initial offer was a fair valuation of Yahoo, and many agreed, it did indicate this week that it would consider upping the offer to $33 per share to avoid a hostile takeover bid. Major Yahoo stock holders say that an offer of $35 to $37 per share could make the deal happen.

A Microsoft spokesman released a statement made by Ballmer to employees after a meeting Thursday night. Ballmer said Microsoft wouldn’t pay a dime over what he thought Yahoo was worth. Ballmer said, “I will go to what I think it's worth if that gets a deal done.”

Ballmer maintains that Microsoft can get to where it wants without the Yahoo buy, but that it would just take longer. Microsoft maintains that it has the technology for a successful ad operation; it simply lacks the scale to go against Google.

Ballmer continued, “We like our strategy. We don't like our position. I’d like to have a better position relative to the guy who sells the most advertising.”

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The new Microsoft
By wordsworm on 5/2/2008 10:27:07 PM , Rating: 5
There are a number of good stories on cnet news about this whole saga. They've definitely been doing a good job in covering the drama. Anyways, I really liked this snippet showing the difference between Ballmer and Gates: "Up until now, Microsoft has been a company where science mattered more than sales. Specifically, Gates valued technology more than marketing and built Microsoft to reflect his priorities. Gates' tech vision was evident through the people Microsoft hired and promoted, the projects that got funding, and the amount of commitment the company put behind various initiatives."

I think that Ballmer would ruin Yahoo. Not that Bill Gates was perfect, but I liked him and consider him to be one of the great people of the last 20 years - not because he was so rich, but because of what he accomplished as a geek. He is a world class nerd in the best sense of the word.

Ballmer, on the other hand, is a big bully. I can't help but think if Ballmer and Gates had met in elementary school instead of college, Ballmer would've been the guy who pulled Gates' shorts over his head. is still the world's most visited webpage. The folks who downplay the value of Yahoo often find ways to overlook this fact. Faced with a takeover attempt by MS, Yahoo has decided to turn and fight for survival. They've done so by, essentially, hastening many of their objectives and innovations.

Perhaps some of you have seen some screenshots on their work in progress of integrating all of their services into one. I liked what I saw.

Anyways, I'm tired of so many people trying to put Yahoo down. They're still a powerhouse on the Internet. They're still much better than MS as an Internet presence. They're still competitive with Google. I find most things they do are as good or better than Google, with the exception of making money off of advertising.

RE: The new Microsoft
By PrinceGaz on 5/4/2008 10:11:25 AM , Rating: 2
RE: The new Microsoft
By encryptkeeper on 5/4/2008 11:28:15 AM , Rating: 2
This article doesn't matter now, Microsoft said hell with it. After all that bluster, just like some schoolyard bully...

RE: The new Microsoft
By wordsworm on 5/4/2008 11:42:22 AM , Rating: 2
This article doesn't matter now, Microsoft said hell with it. After all that bluster, just like some schoolyard bully...

I can only hope. Somehow, after all this big talk, I can't help but get this feeling it's a ploy to create dissension in Yahoo's ranks - who are the groups that are going to react negatively to Yahoo's latest refusal? These would be, I assume, the same groups that MS will be contacting in the hopes that enough of them will create the leverage that MS needs to win the company.

If I'm wrong, and this isn't a ploy, that MS is actually walking away from this attempt, then I cannot help but rejoice in the fact that the Internet has been spared the loss of Google's #1 competitor. Some might argue that it would be added to the #2 competitor to make an even stronger bid, however, it would have been a group that, despite its monstrous financial resources, has largely been unable to reach #2 let alone #1. So, I can't help but think putting people in charge who are not as good as the people at Yahoo right now would do anything but lengthen Google's power over the Internet.

However, I will celebrate this, albeit temporary victory, by listening to Steam's "Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye" followed by Queen's "We will Rock You" on Yahoo unlimited.

"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki