backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by emmet.. on May 19 at 6:27 AM

Offering doesn't equal distribution, says Judge

Arizona District Court Judge Neil V. Wake dealt a heady blow to the RIAA last Monday, striking down its popular “making available” theory as insufficient grounds for accusations of copyright infringement.

Wake’s ruling (PDF) set a higher burden of proof for the RIAA’s campaign of litigation: RIAA investigators – not third party agents, like those at MediaSentry – must download files from a defendant’s hard drive in order to accuse them of unlawful distributing copyrighted materials.

The decision comes from the ongoing case of Atlantic v. Howell, in which the RIAA alleges that Jeffrey Howell and his wife pirated music by making it available for download via KaZaA’s Shared Folders feature. Its claims were supported by screenshots of Howell’s shared folder, as visible to other KaZaA users.

Howell claims that he never intended to place his music within KaZaA’s shared folder, “because that’s not where it belongs.” KaZaA shared the folder without his permission, he said.

In his ruling, Wake wrote that infringement of copyright owners’ rights “requires an actual dissemination of either copies or phonorecords.” Making the music available, which Wake referred to as “an offer to distribute,” does not necessarily constitute actual distribution and therefore inapplicable to the RIAA’s claims. Further, wrote Wake, the court disagreed with the RIAA’s claim that the terms “distribution” and “publication” are alike, as the “publication” of a good is merely the “offering” to distribute copies of a copyrighted work “for purposes of further distribution.”

MediaSentry investigators were able to download 12 of Howell’s files, however, but the court could not conclusively decide that Howell was responsible for making those files available. Wake cited Howell’s own testimony: Howell denied authorizing any of the songs in question for download to other KaZaA users, either by placing them into his shared folder or by using KaZaA’s interface to add them to his shared files list. Adding insult to injury, the EFF filed an amicus curiae brief that claimed that copyright owners cannot infringe their own copyrights, as was the case with MediaSentry acting on the RIAA’s behalf.

It’s important to note that the “making available” theory, as applied in Atlantic v. Howell, is only insufficient for claims regarding the infringement of a copyright owner’s distribution rights; it is sufficient, however, for proving infringement of a copyright owner’s right to reproduce their work – Wake compares this to “a business rents customers video cassettes and a room for viewing the cassette.”

Last December, the RIAA claimed that Howell’s personally ripped music collection was an “unauthorized copy” of its copyrighted works – however the exact meaning of this statement was unclear and it did not directly answer Judge Wake’s original question.





Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

so
By walk2k on 5/4/2008 8:15:20 PM , Rating: 2
did he steal the music in the first place or was it all ripped from CDs he owned?

otherwise it makes NO sense. "it's okay to steal music from other people as long as you don't let other people steal music from you" ???

in either case he's still making it available for other people to steal. obviously if it was a "mistake" that's one thing but 99% of the time that's not the case, people know full well what folder they are sharing or at least they SHOULD. it's not like these programs automatically share everything on your pc.

the latter bit about "not infringing on yourself" is just splitting hairs. point is they downloaded it, therefore millions of people on the internet could download it.

I'm not a fan of the heavy handed methods of the RIAA but come on, stealing music is stealing music. Just because "everyone does it" doesn't make it OK.




"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Related Articles
RIAA: CD Ripping is "Unauthorized Use"
December 17, 2007, 6:31 PM













botimage
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki