backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by JustTom.. on Apr 30 at 1:19 AM

OLPC's legacy could be the technology developed to make the XO Notebook possible, not the XO Notebook itself

Walter Bender was the president of software and content for the One Laptop Per Child Foundation (OLPC). One of his main tasks with the OLPC was to design the interface for the notebook called Sugar. Last week Bender resigned from his position with OLPC.

Xconomy says that the decision to leave was in part because of a split Bender had with founder Nicholas Negroponte over how the foundation should continue its role in the computing world. Bender told Xconomy that he disagreed with Negroponte’s move to de-emphasize projects like Sugar and become more closely associated with established firms in the software business like Microsoft.

Microsoft has previously stated that a version of Windows XP would be running on the XO notebook eventually. Bender says, “If you read between the lines, the idea is to stop trying to be disruptive and to start trying to make things comfortable for decision-makers. Personally, I think that…a role that a non-profit can play is to try to demonstrate better ways of doing things and let the market follow them. But that is a minority opinion [within OLPC], so I left to do my own thing.”

Xconomy says that the legacy of the OLPC may end up not being the XO Notebook itself, but rather the technologies that were developed in order to make the XO Laptop viable. Bender and his Sugar interface aren’t the only technology spin-offs that have come out of the OLPC.

Former CTO Mary Lou Jepsen left the OLPC to form her own company called Pixel Qi to build and market energy-saving screens and other technology originally developed for the OLPC XO Notebook. The technology that both Bender and Jepsen develop could eventually turn up in consumer devices and competing low cost notebooks like the Intel Classmate in the future.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: uh huh
By Justin Case on 4/25/2008 10:10:59 PM , Rating: 2
So you think the only user interface a computer can possibly have is that of MS Windows XP? Ever heard of KDE? Windows Vista? OS X?

Or maybe you're so confused that you think the Windows XP window manager runs on Linux?

Also, last time I checked, there were lots of different kinds of wheels, some better suited to some jobs than others. Maybe you need to tell Boeing and Airbus to use spoked wooden wheels on their planes, because they wouldn't want to spend time and money "reinventing the wheel"...

Have you ever looked at (let alone used) an XO laptop? Didn't think so.


RE: uh huh
By mindless1 on 4/28/2008 4:29:57 AM , Rating: 2
Careful now, you're making too much sense and that really upsets certain types of people. It's not that they disagree with your logic, it's that they will automatically find a reason to disagree with anything that doesn't promote (in this case) windows.

Makes you wonder sometimes, if guerrilla marketing is alive and well. It also makes you wonder if these folks would have said the same thing about there being no need to develop windows whist they were typing away in VI at a terminal 20 years ago. Thank goodness some people still have some vision and a desire to innovate, even if 9 out of 10 of them produce flops.


"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki