backtop


Print 33 comment(s) - last by SandmanWN.. on Apr 29 at 9:16 AM


“I never got money for reprogramming Echostar cards. Someone is trying to set me up,” said Christopher Tarnovsky with regards to the allegations leveled against him.
News Corp claims hackers only assisted in internal network security

The world’s “second best hacker” says he was hired under the table by media conglomerate News Corp, which owns the Wall Street Journal, MySpace, Fox News, and DirecTV.

Christopher Tarnovsky, testifying in Echostar v. NDS, says he was paid $20,000 -- mailed inside electronics sent from Canada -- to break into DISH Network’s satellite system and steal security codes necessary for pirating DISH Network’s satellite signals. EchoStar communications, which owned the DISH Network before a split in December of 2007, alleges that hackers from NDS Group, owned by News Corporation, employed hackers to flood the market with smart cards for satellite receivers designed specifically to steal paid DISH content. Both EchoStar and DISH, as separate entities, are plaintiffs in the case.

The suit alleges that the smart cards cost DISH $900M in lost sales and network repairs.

Tarnovsky says that while he was employed to develop “pirating software,” it was not used against DISH or any other rival – instead, it was designed to secure DirecTV’s network.

DISH attorneys said Tarnovsky constructed a device called “The Stinger” – which Tarnovsky admitted to doing – that was able to interface with any smart card, regardless of which company it was designed to work with. Tarnovsky says his actions with The Stinger were aboveboard, but DISH attorneys claimed that hackers and/or NDS employees used it to reprogram at least 50 DISH Network smart cards.

“I never got money for reprogramming Echostar cards,” Tarnovsky testified. “Someone is trying to set me up.”

Patent records reveal Tarnovsky received patent protection on a “system for testing, verifying legitimacy of smart card in-situ and for storing data therein” in 2005.

Earlier, fellow hacker and associate Tony Dionisi testified that he recalled Tarnovsky bragging to him about The Stinger, and told the court that he knew of “another hacker and NDS employee” who used the machine to reprogram DISH’s smart cards.

Tarnovsky says he was paid on a regular basis for 10 years, and received paychecks from Harper Collins, News Corp’s publishing company.

DISH lead attorney Wade Welch, speaking earlier this month, said NDS’ plan was to take hackers “off the streets” and “turn them on the competitors.”

“They called it the Black Hat Team,” said Welch.

NDS says it’s done nothing wrong. “Because this is a competitive business, NDS also monitors competitors,” said NDS attorney Richard Stone. “NDS has done nothing to illegally harm or damage EchoStar. All NDS has done is compete hard and fair in the marketplace.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why News Corp?
By nah on 4/25/2008 9:14:34 AM , Rating: 1
By that definition the people at Thyssen Corp who produced Zyklon B gas were also legal--as they were legally licenced by the Nazi Govt of Germany to make those--not to mention the V2s and other really nice stuff--
This argument won't work unless you define which governments are so-called 'rogue' ones and which ones aren't---in those days Germany and Italy weren't called rogue govts--until the war actually started---yet before that Italy poison-gassed Ethiopia and Germany Spain--yet they bombed and killed more people than the 'rogue' ones of today


RE: Why News Corp?
By littlebitstrouds on 4/25/2008 11:56:58 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Are they accomplices for people that use their products to make bombs.

Welllll of course that all depends on who won the war, and got to write the history books.


RE: Why News Corp?
By JonnyDough on 4/28/2008 2:16:40 PM , Rating: 2
The reply to my post about becoming an accomplice was silly. We weren't talking about backing governments, we were talking about backing a corporation in an illegal motion against another. This isn't World War II, and nobody is dying from this hacking. It's illegal according to U.S. law. Whether or not you agree with the laws of the U.S. is irrelevant. I was simply stating that, per our government system - this is illegal and he could be charged as an accomplice. He is to blame as well, just as IBM was back when they were helping Hitler. The question of guilt lies within the hacker's knowledge. If it can be proven that he was aware of the intended use, then he cannot plead the fifth.


RE: Why News Corp?
By SandmanWN on 4/29/2008 9:16:29 AM , Rating: 2
Which law is that btw? Must be the one about presumption of guilt I suppose. You are assuming he is guilty because he created a tool to read smart cards. He actually has to use it for financial gain or wrong doing before its illegal.


"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki