AMD Responds to Intel Pressure With New Tri-cores
April 23, 2008 5:36 PM
comment(s) - last by
AMD today launches three new Phenom tri-cores as well as two new Athlon chips and a low-power Phenom quad-core
AMD today launched three new Phenom X3 "50" Series triple-core processors. In addition, AMD also announced a low-power quad-core Phenom X4 processor. The new chips released by AMD are launched just days after Intel's flurry of price cuts that took place earlier this week. The price cuts considerably upped the pressure on AMD and have forced AMD to rethink its strategy, especially because the company has mainly been attempting to stay competitive with Intel offerings through price.
All three of the new chips sport AMD's X3 moniker, which signifies that they are triple-core chips. The AMD Phenom X3 8750, the fastest of the new tri-core chips, runs at 2.4 GHz and is priced at $195. The Phenom X3 8650 runs at 2.3 GHz and is priced at $165. Bottom on the list is the Phenom X3 8450, which runs at 2.1 GHz and is priced at $145.
These new Phenom X3 processors are based on AMD's B3 stepping. The Phenom X3 processors that were delivered to OEM partners earlier were based on AMD's B2 revision,which sufferred from a nasty bug in the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) in the L3 cache.
AMD is attempting to make its new Phenom chips more attractive by combining them with the company's 780 series chipset. According to the company, the duo will offer consumers "a full HD experience."
AMD says the new processors will give consumers a more balanced option compared to NVIDIA and Intel. "On one side, we have Nvidia saying that the only thing that matters is graphics. On the other side, Intel is saying that the only thing that matters is the processor. AMD offers a balanced platform that doesn't overemphasize one really expensive component over another really expensive component," said Brent Berry, AMD product marketing manager.
AMD's low-power quad-core Phenom X4 was also launched today. Dubbed the Phenom X4 9100e, the new chip has a total Thermal Design Power of 65 watts. Comparatively, AMD's standard Phenom X4 chips have a 95 watt thermal envelope.
In addition to the three new tri-core chips and low-power quad-core processor, AMD also updated its low-end offerings with two new 45-watt processors; the Athlon X2 4450e and X2 4050e. As the name indicates, the new chips are based on AMD's Athlon architecture. Both chips are dual-core and respectively run at 2.3 GHz and 2.1 GHz.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: AMD is right
4/24/2008 9:51:10 PM
I actually thinking about picking up a tri core... but I'm certainly not doing it this month. Sure... they may be $197 for the fastest X3 now, but in about 3 months I bet that the price will drop to about $159 or less to start clearing that old stock, with further price cuts on the lower clocked models. Early adopters are going to pay the early adopter price. But to pay something like $150 for something I can get workable performance out of and maybe goose another 200mhz from overclocking, then that's not too bad. The only thing keeping me from pulling the trigger is the estimated shelf life of AM2+. If they're just going to roll out AM3 in 2 quarters, I'd rather sit around, save my money, and wait for the results from that. That's the main reason I won't commit to buying a 775 socket mobo; knowing full well that's going to go away when the new Intel chips hit later this year.
And I will agree with you, the 8800GT edges out the 3870 overall. But I actually went with purchasing a 3870 because of the Hybrid Crossfire. Because if I do wait and buy a cheap Q6600, I'm not going to bother with a nForce chipset. I'm going to buy a better performing Intel chipset to go with it. But if you want to do multiple GPUs on that kind of platform, the only sensible choice is the AMD/ATI route. Also, if I want to utilize my 3870 with a 3870X2 later (which does scale very well as a combo) I have that option. Or (and I'm hoping that AMD does this) will allow the 3870 to work along with the next generation of GPUs they offer, so that I can still get a longer usage from that card. From what I understand about Hybrid Crossfire, it's bottleneck is the slowest memory bandwidth. If they don't really change those RAM specs (doubt it... but hey), then I should be able to milk this setup for all it's worth.
I don't want to sound like an AMD/ATI fanboy or anything, because I'm not. But I do like those features and see a value there. Especially when prices drop. But... the prices have to drop for me to bite.
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information