Print 34 comment(s) - last by zsdersw.. on Apr 25 at 2:08 PM

AMD today launches three new Phenom tri-cores as well as two new Athlon chips and a low-power Phenom quad-core

AMD today launched three new Phenom X3 "50" Series triple-core processors. In addition, AMD also announced a low-power quad-core Phenom X4 processor. The new chips released by AMD are launched just days after Intel's flurry of price cuts that took place earlier this week. The price cuts considerably upped the pressure on AMD and have forced AMD to rethink its strategy, especially because the company has mainly been attempting to stay competitive with Intel offerings through price.

All three of the new chips sport AMD's X3 moniker, which signifies that they are triple-core chips. The AMD Phenom X3 8750, the fastest of the new tri-core chips, runs at 2.4  GHz and is priced at $195. The Phenom X3 8650 runs at 2.3 GHz and is priced at $165. Bottom on the list is the Phenom X3 8450, which runs at 2.1 GHz and is priced at $145.  

These new Phenom X3 processors are based on AMD's B3 stepping. The Phenom X3 processors that were delivered to OEM partners earlier were based on AMD's B2 revision,which sufferred from a nasty bug in the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) in the L3 cache.  

AMD is attempting to make its new Phenom chips more attractive by combining them with the company's 780 series chipset. According to the company, the duo will offer consumers "a full HD experience."

AMD says the new processors will give consumers a more balanced option compared to NVIDIA and Intel. "On one side, we have Nvidia saying that the only thing that matters is graphics. On the other side, Intel is saying that the only thing that matters is the processor. AMD offers a balanced platform that doesn't overemphasize one really expensive component over another really expensive component," said Brent Berry, AMD product marketing manager.

AMD's low-power quad-core Phenom X4 was also launched today. Dubbed the Phenom X4 9100e, the new chip has a total Thermal Design Power of 65 watts. Comparatively, AMD's standard Phenom X4 chips have a 95 watt thermal envelope.   

In addition to the three new tri-core chips and low-power quad-core processor, AMD also updated its low-end offerings with two new 45-watt processors; the Athlon X2 4450e and X2 4050e. As the name indicates, the new chips are based on AMD's Athlon architecture. Both chips are dual-core and respectively run at 2.3 GHz and 2.1 GHz.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Low-end reviews?
By CaioKK on 4/24/2008 1:32:03 AM , Rating: 2
It's been quite a while since I've seen the low-end chips getting reviewed. I see AMD lauching a bunch of low TDP and low-chips, and everyone says that AMD is the main supplier to this market, but how does the X2 4450e and X2 4050e stack up against say, the Celeron E1200 or the 430?

RE: Low-end reviews?
By nosfe on 4/24/2008 4:25:08 AM , Rating: 2
don't forget that at that price point its not just the processors, its also the chipset that counts and 780G is miles ahead of G35

RE: Low-end reviews?
By zsdersw on 4/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: Low-end reviews?
By misuspita on 4/24/2008 6:51:55 AM , Rating: 5
No but they are interested in flawless HD content playback without eating the battery or having to buy a graphic card. For example, on my shitty Laptop, actually shitty integated Intel GPU even some multiple flash animation on some sites don't work seamlessly and stutter.

So I'd think even if people won't want a graphic workstation, a little more power on the graphics side wouldn't hurt. Wich AMD has for the moment and intel hasn't... for the time being

RE: Low-end reviews?
By zsdersw on 4/25/2008 2:04:00 PM , Rating: 2
I've had nothing like that with the 945 chipset at work.

RE: Low-end reviews?
By Calin on 4/24/2008 6:56:22 AM , Rating: 4

They certainly won't care if their visual experience is the one or the other. There is just a small difference of 3 to 23 frames per second, and a bit of graphical quality difference which you could easily spot

RE: Low-end reviews?
By zsdersw on 4/25/2008 2:08:04 PM , Rating: 2
[sarcasm] The people who buy the $350 Dell special are certainly going to make as much of a mountain out of a mole hill as you are. [/sarcasm]

RE: Low-end reviews?
By bryanW1995 on 4/24/2008 12:19:56 PM , Rating: 2
the celerons are so low on cache that even x2's outperform them clock/clock. the pentium E dual cores are slightly better clock/clock than an x2. Go look at tom's cpu comparison guide for more details.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki