Vista and the Quest for More Memory
March 19, 2006 8:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Peak growths for DRAM memory have occured with major Windows launches - Courtesy SEC Marketing
How Vista will affect your next memory purchase...
With Windows Vista’s anticipated launch later this year, a concern on everyone’s mind is how Vista will tax existing PC platforms. Although the new graphical user interface will require DirectX 9 support, and Intel G965 (or better) graphic accelerators, the real question mark in everyone’s minds is where DRAM requirements will head for Windows Vista. Baseline Vista offerings will require 512MB of DRAM just to install, with a 1GB recommendation -- but is there more to this story?
Integrated graphics from ATI, Intel, and NVIDIA all use shared memory architectures. This means that even though the graphics core is on the motherboard Northbridge, the graphics controller accesses memory from the system main memory. Low end, PCIe 3D accelerations from ATI, and NVIDIA also use shared memory support, using in excess of 256MB of system DRAM in exchange for a dirt cheap graphics accelerator. On these systems the Vista recommendation for 512MB is not acceptable as a significant amount of main memory is consumed by the graphics accelerators.
Furthermore, Windows Vista will come with a new feature called Superfetch. With Windows XP, Microsoft included a feature called Prefetch: a dynamic service that preemptively loads files into the pagefile in order to speed up application load time. Superfetch advances further in two steps. Step one is to build profiles of frequently used applications and store those profiles into the pagefile, and system memory. Step two is to pool NAND and all other available memory to move as much of the pagefile as possible off the hard drive and onto the solid state memory. As a result, anyone with a heavy usage profile will have a significant portion of their system memory dedicated to application data.
At IDF we recently had the opportunity to talk to Tom Trill, Samsung Semiconductor's Director of DRAM Marketing. An interesting point Trill mentioned to us is that system integrators generally spend 6-8% of the system cost on memory. Retail DDR2-667 crossed over into the $80 USD per gigabyte range a few months ago with the price for system integrators hovering around $60. AMD and Intel both have new processors expected to utilize DDR2-800 before the Q4 launch of Windows Vista. By conservative estimates, we can expect to see the average system integrator bundle new computers with 1GB of DDR2-667 by the end of this year.
Samsung’s internal research recently published a figure claiming that the average PC system (including SI, OEM and home built computers) averages 871MB of DRAM in 2005, up from 620MB the year before. The DRAM industry has traditionally seen large growth around the launches of Windows operating system such as Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows XP. With large growth come large economies of scale, and ultimately lower prices for DRAM are on the horizon. Furthermore, with cheaper DRAM prices, system integrators are free to integrate more memory into the magic 6-8% budget. With such favorable trends, seeing 2GB of memory as a standard in every PC by the end of this year would be of no surprise to us at all.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
No one here has actually posted what vista actually uses...could someone do the obvious
3/21/2006 8:37:21 PM
I the whole point of the article is that due to vista people would be sucking up more ram and whatnot. But I haven't read ANYWHERE how much ram a clean install of the lastest beta sucks up. For instance a clean install of XP PRO SP2 with everything on (firewall ecet) is 127 for me. Of course open Internet explorer and it goes up. But you can really make due with 192 (128+64) with XP if you were upgrading and are cheap. What is Vista on boot not counting those widgets as they aren't ESSENTIAL like a firewall or windows restore (restore is the best part about XP!). Also those widgets are a huge memory hog if konfabulator is any indication. I know windows vista caches frequently used programs but can anyone tell me what Vista OS itself needs to load everything into ram????
On a side note I am always using msconfig to clear out Quicktime, Nero, and Acrobat startup file. I think I am going to be in my own personal hell if I see them cached into my precious memory. Those stupid programs take 2 seconds to load up without their memory hogging things they drive me nuts.
"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh
12/20/2013 Daily Hardware Reviews
December 20, 2013, 9:09 AM
Gigabyte Z87X-UD7 TH Motherboard Gets Thunderbolt 2 Certification
December 16, 2013, 11:01 AM
Report: Google May Design its Own ARM-Based Server Processors
December 13, 2013, 12:25 PM
Qualcomm Unveils First 64-Bit "Snapdragon 410" Mobile Processor
December 10, 2013, 12:20 PM
12/9/2013 Daily Hardware Reviews
December 9, 2013, 5:34 PM
Samsung Unveils "Industry First" 1TB mSATA SSD
December 9, 2013, 10:21 AM
Most Popular Articles
China's Moon Rover Lands Safe and Sound, Starts Snapping Pics
December 16, 2013, 1:22 PM
Top Microsoft Graphics Genius Defects to Google
December 17, 2013, 4:27 PM
Dogecoins and Its IBM Developer Ride Meme to $130M+ Fortune
December 18, 2013, 4:21 PM
Harvard Undergrad Busted by Wi-Fi after Making Bomb Threat to Avoid Finals
December 18, 2013, 10:37 AM
NSA Debates Granting Snowden Amnesty if He Keeps His Mouth Shut
December 16, 2013, 1:17 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
AT&T Explores $100B+ USD Deal to Acquire Vodafone's European Operations
Nov 4, 2013, 7:34 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information