Print 90 comment(s) - last by MicahK.. on Apr 28 at 2:42 AM

Friendly, detailed, and expedient, Sungevity offers a compelling and painless argument for private solar installation.  (Source: Sungevity)
New solar sales site is part internet maps, part environmental advocate, and part business planner

While big solar plants and high tech solar cells using high-efficiency or exotic materials steal all the spotlight, it is shameful to overlook the very real financial and ecological benefits of private consumer solar cell adoption.  Private adoption lets users cut their power costs drastically, and cut down on the burning of fossil fuels, which releases greenhouse gases, sulfates, nitrates, and toxic phenyl compounds.

It seems hard to argue the logic of such benefits, but there are the inevitable detractions.  First, even with government rebates which are available in most states, the process needs an upfront investment of anywhere from $7,000 to as much as $40,000 for very large homes.  Further, some areas get less sunlight then others, so not all of these investments are created equal.  Worse still, the planning process can involve weeks of quotes and uncertainty.

This is where Sungevity, a new company founded by enterprising entrepreneur Danny Kennedy, comes in.  Sungevity looks to take the pain out of purchasing private solar power.  Users simply log onto the site, submit their address and electrical bill information and within 24 hours they have a detailed individualized analysis that beats many private quotes taking 10 times as long to receive or more.

The quote starts with the basic price of installation after local rebates.  It continues with the prospective savings over 25 years (most cells have a life of around 25-30 years or more) and how much the system will increase the value of their home (green is considered a selling point, even in today's troubled economy).  The analysis even includes images of how your house would look with solar panels.  Traditional analysis would require physical examination of the roof and days of inspection, processing, and numbers crunching.

His new system takes a complicated system and makes it simple says Kennedy.  He states, "We do all that (the calculations for preparing the estimate) in about 10 to 15 minutes."

Pleased customers can put down a deposit after their quote and schedule an installation appointment.  It's hard to get much more pain free than that.  While the system currently only operates out of its home state, California, it plans to soon expand to additional states.

A CNET writer, Michael Kanellos, did an analysis on his grandmother's house as a test of the new system.  He found that the system would provide 25 percent of the home's power on average and cost $7,511 after government rebates.  The total savings over 25 years would be an incredible $27,360.  The quote easily beat the 24-hour guarantee, coming back in a mere 2 hours.  A deposit could be placed conveniently using Visa, MasterCard, and American Express, the writer noted.

The new Sungevity system not only helps the customer, but saves money for the seller as well.  The software eliminates the need to pay an inspector to come out and visit the house to develop an estimate.  According to Kennedy, only 10 percent of such visits end in the sale.  The result is the installation cost, typically half the cost of the panels themselves, is unnecessarily high.

The system cuts installation costs by around 10 percent, and reduces estimating costs by as much as 80 percent.  The system also includes software that coordinates installation and delivery, helping to further cut down on labor costs.

The "magic smoke" driving the whole engine is a complex amalgamation of the Internet's most advanced resources.  Sungevity uses Microsoft Virtual Earth's satellite data to derive its information on the house.  The company gave Microsoft a one up over rival Google, as Microsoft offers views from different angles, where as Google only offers a top-down view. 

From the satellite information Sungevity calculates the pitch of the roof (its angle), the azimuth (what compass direction it faces), and the amount of free space for the system.  The system also takes into account the user's electrical use and geographically based average levels of solar radiation.

The company will be showcasing its hard work, mailing free fliers to addresses in Albany, Calif., with free analysis, showcasing its prowess.  While the estimates need a bit of fine-tuning based on the owner's power bills, the fliers should contain reasonable estimates and help to show the customer what their home would look like in images that combine actual pictures of their house with computer generated images.

To cut costs, Sungevity offers 5 different size systems, rather than going for custom sizes.  These mass produced systems range from 1.4 kilowatts to 5.6 kilowatts and typically cost $7,500 to $38,500 after rebates.

Sungevity is currently working to secure solar installers as subcontractors in other states or to offer its estimating services to solar contractors in other states.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Cost and Savings
By masher2 on 4/24/2008 3:58:19 PM , Rating: 3
> "The total savings over 25 years would be an incredible $27,360..."

As Mozee points out, this just barely outstrips what one would make in interest over the same period. (And doesn't even come close to your average return in stock investments). But it's worse than that-- such savings estimates are usually *extremely* optimistic (this is eseentially a sales tool, after all). If you notice, the site doesn't guarantee their cost savings figures are accurate. And the figures also don't take into account maintenance over that 25-year period.

Furthermore, these savings are entirely dependent on government rebates...which means if everyone engages in this, you wind up paying the full cost of the system (government money comes from us all in the end, after all).

RE: Cost and Savings
By myocardia on 4/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: Cost and Savings
By masher2 on 4/24/2008 9:51:22 PM , Rating: 2
> "there's zero maintenance on any home solar system"

Flatly untrue. All systems need repairs and maintenance, especially over periods which span decades. I have a passive solar system for my swimming pool myself, and though the system is barely over five years old, I've already had one hefty repair paying someone $100 once a year to go up on the roof and clean the panels.

> "what kind of moron would be complaining about something that helps lesson the damage you do to the planet "

That assumes that a) you're "doing damage" to the planet, and b) that these cells lessen it...two things you'll have a very hard time proving.

> "that makes slightly more than the most common type of no-risk investment"

Again, in practice, you'll find such systems rarely do as well as these overly optimistic estimates claim.

RE: Cost and Savings
By MadMaster on 4/24/2008 11:28:50 PM , Rating: 2
That assumes that a) you're "doing damage" to the planet, and b) that these cells lessen it...two things you'll have a very hard time proving.

...Or disproving.

RE: Cost and Savings
By masher2 on 4/25/2008 12:16:23 AM , Rating: 2
By basic logical reasoning, the burden of proof is on a person making a claim, not the person disputing it. This is for the simple reason that negative proofs don't exist.

I can't DIS prove that 600 cloned baby Hitlers aren't alive on the far side of the moon. All I can do is ask you to prove such an assertion.

RE: Cost and Savings
By MadMaster on 4/25/2008 9:18:58 AM , Rating: 2
Good thing you're not a scientist. You'd write a lot of bad papers.

Nothing is ever proven or disproven in science. There are hypothesis, theory, and law...

RE: Cost and Savings
By masher2 on 4/25/2008 1:50:15 PM , Rating: 2
You miss the point. Negative proofs don't exist. If you want to suggest something is true, you need to supply proof, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.

RE: Cost and Savings
By MadMaster on 4/25/2008 7:45:09 PM , Rating: 2
Neither exist! Especially in the context you are using.

It is VERY subjective...

But that's why you use that argument, you have to be right... but it show's your ignorance.

Hypothesize then back with evidence/data. That's the objective process.

"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki