Print 39 comment(s) - last by slunkius.. on Apr 23 at 12:58 AM

Who would do such a grievous deed?

Most know that the internet teems with the high-tech equivalent of the petty crook; waiting to take advantage of the unwitting.  However, far more alarming than a malicious teenager coding malware, in many ways, is the growing amount of nationalistic attacks on the web.  Many of these attacks come from China, and, according to U.S. and British armed forces and intelligence, are government-sponsored.

The attacks have occurred in the public sector-- on the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, and on government contractors-- and now they're occurring in the private sector as well.  Last Thursday, was targeted by takedown attempts after it ran coverage of pro-independence protest events in Tibet.  CNN fought back deploying countermeasures, but this yielded "web attrition" in the form of its services being slow or unreachable to many in Asia.

While CNN states that the scale of problems due to its defensive measures were relatively small, it also acknowledges that the incident was significant.  Said the network, "CNN took preventative measures to filter traffic in response to attempts to disrupt our Web site. A small percentage of users in Asia are impacted.  We do not know who is responsible, nor can we confirm where it came from."

The site came under attack midday Thursday, when it began to experience unexpected problems.  The support staff found that by blocking visitors from certain geographic locations it could mostly silence the attack.  CNN has not released exactly what locations it blocked, but its comments indicate that they were in Asia.  The blocking caused loss of service to some legitimate Asian users, according to the news network.

CNN downplayed the loss-of-service, stating that it was almost "imperceptible" and that "at no time" did the site go down.  By mid-morning Friday, normal operations had resumed.

While CNN has not officially announced who it suspects committed the attacks, the Asian web community was reporting prior to the attacks that in China there were calls for denial-of-service attacks on the site.  The site's coverage of unrest in Tibet and Olympic protests riled many in the Chinese government and many Chinese nationalists.

Chinese bloggers have heavily criticized CNN's coverage of pro-independence movements in Tibet as being "unfair".  CNN says these claims are ridiculous and states, "CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story."

For those unfamiliar, a denial of service attack works by an attacker using large groups of computers which they control to send numerous service requests to a website.  Websites can only cope with a certain level of traffic, and at a certain point, the site will become slow and, often, inaccessible.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By NoMediaDistortion on 4/21/2008 11:59:26 PM , Rating: 2
When people are so 'high' about the Tibet issue, most of then actually know nothing about Tibet.

"CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story."
This is really a joke to me, especially for recent coverage on Tibet. Why?
When there are videos that shows how those so-called 'peaceful protester' kill innocent civilian people on street, burn the shops, fire trucks, and schools, CNN still hail the mobsters as 'hero'. The following is a video taken by an Australia tourist in Tibet.

For other incidents, videos like that would be treated like the 'precious' by CNN. In Virginia Tech massacre, a video taken by someone's cellphone was aired again, again and again. However, do you even see a glimpse of videos of the 'peaceful' mobster in Tibet riot? Is this how CNN call themselves "always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story"?

I am no good in English. For people who wants to know a little bit more about Tibet, you can start from the following post by M.A.Jones, who did a very good research on Tibet. The posts present a lot of "quantitative as well as qualitative evidence".

There are also videos on
1. Tibet, the truth
2. Riot in Tibet: True face of western media

There are so many videos on youtube. Some of them are pro-tibet. Some of them are pro-china. You can watch the video from both side. But please do judge them by facts, not just accusations from random people without solid proof.

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki