Print 134 comment(s) - last by kayronjm.. on Apr 17 at 5:26 PM

The truth comes out about User Account Control

Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system has been lambasted ever since it was launched for consumers in January 2007. Diehard Windows users balked at the steep system requirements, sometimes sluggish performance, inadequate driver support, and varying products SKUs at multiple price points.

One feature that has caused quite a bit of controversy with consumers has been the User Account Control (UAC) that is included in Windows Vista. UAC prompts nag users for simple operations such as going to device manager, emptying the recycle bin, or installing/uninstalling an application.

David Cross, a product manager responsible for designing UAC, gave the real reason for UAC at the RSA 2008 conference in San Francisco yesterday. "The reason we put UAC into the platform was to annoy users. I'm serious," remarked Cross.

Cross added that Microsoft's unorthodox method to stop users from wreaking havoc with their systems and to stop software makers from making applications that delved too far into the Windows subsystem was a necessary move.

"We needed to change the ecosystem, and we needed a heavy hammer to do it," Cross added. Cross went on to say that although UAC may be seen as an annoyance to some, but its lasting implications are far more beneficial to Vista users. "Most users, on a daily basis, actually have zero UAC prompts."

Many would say that many users have zero UAC prompts on a daily basis because they have already disabled UAC -- not so says Microsoft. According to Cross, 88% of Vista users have UAC enabled and 66% of Windows sessions do not encounter UAC prompts.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Huh?
By UNCjigga on 4/11/2008 11:39:27 AM , Rating: 0
So in other words, UAC was meant to discourage use of non-MS software. Way to build support for your OS platform guys (golf clap)

RE: Huh?
By darkpaw on 4/11/2008 12:21:08 PM , Rating: 3
Non-MS software wouldn't trigger it either if it was coded properly. Software apps should not need admin/power user rights just to execute. It's not MS's fault that some software dev's (hiya Intuit, I'm looking at you) take the easy road and code in a way that requires admin privileges.

RE: Huh?
By darkpaw on 4/11/2008 12:23:45 PM , Rating: 2
*Should be "most" software apps should not need admin/power user rights.

Stuff that interacts directly with hardware or the kernal is a different story.

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki