Print 49 comment(s) - last by Regs.. on May 5 at 7:22 AM

The hits keep on coming for AMD

Last week, reports began to swirl around the internet that AMD slashed 5% of its workforce. AMD denied the reports and issued a statement saying, "We did not have a workforce reduction."

It appears that the reports of job cuts were true; however, the size and timing of the layoffs were wrong. According to Information Week, AMD plans to axe off 1,600 employees before the close of September -- this would represent a 10% reduction in AMD's current workforce of 16,000 employees.

The jobs are a necessary move to help lift AMD from the gutter in terms of financial performance. AMD did not disclose which locations or what positions within the company would see the bulk of the workforce reduction.

AMD had a rough 2007 and reported revenues of $1.77B and a $1.722B loss during the closing quarter of the year. 2007 yearly totals saw AMD with $6.012B in revenue and a net loss of $3.379B.

AMD expects that Q1 revenue will come in at roughly $1.5B or 15% lower than Q4 2007 -- the loss came from an unexpected decline in every market that AMD competes.

We will still have to wait a few days longer to hear the full damage report for AMD's Q1 earnings. Despite the already grim forecast, AMD is looking forward to the latter half of the year when it will push its 45nm processors to customers.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

So in hindsight...
By TerranMagistrate on 4/8/2008 3:39:16 AM , Rating: 1
Purchasing ATi probably wasn't the best decision for AMD now was it.

Microsoft ought to reach into its pockets from some change in order to buy AMD and package AMD CPUs with Vista for dirt cheap to all major vendors. Or maybe not.

RE: So in hindsight...
By ThisSpaceForRent on 4/8/2008 8:28:39 AM , Rating: 2
Hehe, can you imagine if Microsoft did that? They'd probably get sued over night for anti-trust violations.

I wouldn't be surprised if Intel pumps some cash into AMD, and starts increasing the prices of their processors. Intel needs AMD (so they have "competition") and by increasing their prices they can push some market share back to AMD.

RE: So in hindsight...
By darkpaw on 4/8/2008 9:43:22 AM , Rating: 2
Reminds me of MS bailing out Apple in the 90s just to save their "competition". I wish they hadn't, Apple woulda been dead and I wouldn't have to listen to the constant whining of the latte sipping computer fashionista crowd.

I'd really be surprised to see Intel bail out AMD though, I'm sure someone will be buying them up for peanuts within the year.

"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki