Print 61 comment(s) - last by strmbkr.. on Apr 7 at 12:44 PM

The little logo that has Apple in a tiff.  (Source: NYC)
Apple and Steve Jobs are unhappy with New York's new logo for its green campaign

Looking at NYC's GreeNYC campaign logo -- a little green apple with curve bisecting it -- it certain looks harmless.  The GreeNYC campaign was launched by Mayor Bloomberg as part of a vision for sustainability over the next twenty-five years.  It aims to cut the city's carbon emissions by 30 percent and to conserve natural resources.

The innocent looking logo has been popping up of late on bus shelters, hybrid taxis and shopping bags from Whole Foods.  The city filed for trademark for the logo in May 2007.  Soon after filing Apple began a fierce legal campaign against the symbol, which it has continued to escalate to the present.  Apple claims that the earth friendly logo will, "seriously injure the reputation with which [Apple] has established for its goods and services."

Perhaps Apple bears a bit of ill will against environmentalist movements due to its rough treatment at their hands in the past.  Environmental activists Greenpeace blasted the MacBook Air, which it gave a B-, and the iPhone, which it denounced as "toxic".  Still, Apple has promised reform and has tried to revamp its products to be environmentally.  CEO Steve Jobs even claims to be a big environmentalist and supporter of Nobel Prize-winning activist Al Gore.

Regardless Apple, for some reason, has chosen to wage legal war against NYC over a trademark that looks at casual glance little if anything like the Apple logo, other than its a logo with an apple in it.  NYC officials state. "The city believes that Apple's claims have no merit and that no consumer is likely to be confused."

Lawyers specializing in trademarks stated that Apple will be hard pressed to prove a case of trademark dilution.  For such a case to work, Apple would have to virtually argue than any logo with an apple in it violates Apple's trademarks. In other words Apple has to basically prove that it has exclusive trademark of the world's most popular produce.

Apple has waged lengthy legal campaigns over its name and device names in the past.  Apple finally ended its long battle with the Beatles' Apple Corps not long ago, opening the way for a possible arrival of the Beatles catalog on iTunesApple also fought Cisco Systems, who tried to use the name iPhone for its products to Apple's chagrin.

The final decision will be made by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the patent office.  Currently surveys are being commissioned which will question people at malls across the country to determine if Apple has any right to challenge NYC over the logo.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Fvck you $teve Jobs
By 325hhee on 4/4/2008 2:41:44 PM , Rating: 3
Man this guy makes me sicker and sicker everyday. Does he think he owns the word apple or anything and everything to do with it? Why not sue every single fruit company that picks apples, or anyone that markets apple juice.

I hate $teve Jobs and his brainwashed apple fanboys/girls. Somebody stop them already, NYC has been an apple way before he was even born. NYC should sue the crap out of him, we're the Big Apple, he's nothing but a seed.

RE: Fvck you $teve Jobs
By Imazalil on 4/4/08, Rating: 0
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 4/4/2008 3:38:09 PM , Rating: 5
other than commenting on the trademark application, which is a normal part of said application. It's just a random blog full of hot air.

They are challenging the application, which is clearly stated in the article. That is not suing, nor just merely commenting either.

The "Dvorak method" of gaining page views would be (oh I don't know) Crain's or Engadget getting the story wrong.

RE: Fvck you $teve Jobs
By omnicronx on 4/4/2008 4:31:20 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, good thing you are not brainwashed and realize that this article doesn't link to a single real story about apple doing anything, other than commenting on the trademark application, which is a normal part of said application . It's just a random blog full of hot air.
The article states exactly what happened, and I find Apples intentions here interesting, regardless if commenting on an application is part of the process. If you think DT just wants page views, and neglects content, then why are you here anyways?

RE: Fvck you $teve Jobs
By pugster on 4/4/2008 3:32:02 PM , Rating: 1
Next thing that Steve Jobs wants to do is to go after the Apple Industry for name infringementment, sue the writers of Merriam Webster dictionary to change the definition of apple to a company from a fruit, and make sue the candy maker for making sour apple candy for defaming the apple name.

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki