Microsoft Wins Document Format Standards Battle
April 2, 2008 4:15 PM
comment(s) - last by
Microsoft takes important step in crushing its rival's format
Microsoft has long profited from proprietary formats, occasionally at its competitors' expense. However, with open standards coming into vogue, Microsoft adopted an "if you can't beat them, join them" approach, creating its own
open document format
However, its new format was not warmly received. Microsoft hoped its Office Open XML (OOXML) format would become the office file format of choice for the industry. The OpenDoc Society, a long term opponent of Microsoft, did not believe in Microsoft's sudden change of heart. It sought to
outcompete OOXML, with its existing format, Open Document Format (ODF)
The ODF format is already ratified as a standard by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), solidifying its place in the academic and business communities as a viable option. When Microsoft sought ISO ratification, the OpenDoc Society lobbied against it. It argued that having multiple open document standards defeats the purpose of having standards and that the standard would allow Microsoft to tighten its grip on computer systems.
In the end the OpenDoc Society's campaign was an exercise in futility as Microsoft's OOXML has
finally been ISO certified
. The decision was leaked Tuesday ahead of the official ISO announcement, which came today. Microsoft lauded the move, saying that it created a "level playing field" for OOXML to competed with ODF and other formats.
Tom Robertson, Microsoft's head of interoperability and standards, stated, "Open XML joins the
ranks of PDF
, HTML and ODF among the ranks of document formats. I think it makes it easier for governments to offer users choice. The control over the specification now moves into the hands of the global community. This is going to be one of the most, if not the most important document format around the world for years to come."
James Love, director of Knowledge Economy International, an organization campaigning for more open access to knowledge critical of OOXML, stated, "We are disappointed. Microsoft's control over document formats has destroyed competition on the desktop, and the fight over OOXML is really a fight over the future of competition and innovation."
Microsoft lost an initial first vote, putting the format's future in jeopardy. The format was allowed a second balloting, though, and this time it passed. Of those voting, 86 percent of voting national bodies and 75 percent of the voting members -- known as P-members -- moved to approve the format. A two-thirds approval among P-members was sufficient to ratify the format. Voting for Microsoft's OOXML were the United States, Britain, Germany and Japan. Voting against it were China, India and Russia.
The committee had a tough job just reaching the vote, having to deal with the 6,000 pages of code that define OOXML and with over 1,000 points of order, topics to be discussed before the vote. Critics of OOXML point out that ODF is only 860 pages of code, making it difficult to guarantee true interoperability between the formats. Microsoft continues to insist that
OOXML will be fully interoperable with ODF
Michiel Leenaars, OpenDoc Society boardmember and ISO voting member, stated that the standard should not have been ratified and the ratification process was too hasty. He states, "It was mission impossible. The process wasn't meant for this type of thing."
Nonetheless, Microsoft has secured ratification and fulfilled its critics worse fears by moving one step closer to domination of the next generation industry standard for office documents.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: No Biggie
4/3/2008 9:52:13 AM
No one is complaining about users. Most projects supporting ODF don't need to fight for users because they don't have a revenue stream to maintain and investors to keep happy.
What I, as a developer and IT consultant care about, is the ability to parse documents in a well defined manner, now and into the future, with or without the support of any single corporation. I don't believe OOXML does that and I don't believe OOXML will be correctly implemented by Microsoft (they refuse to commit to it, their own standard!).
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot
Microsoft Announces Release of Open XML, ODF Translator
February 5, 2007, 7:49 AM
Adobe PDF Gears Up for ISO Standardization
January 29, 2007, 6:11 PM
Microsoft Welcomes Open Document Format to Office 2007
July 6, 2006, 12:27 PM
Microsoft Says OpenDocument Format Isn't Satisfactory
May 26, 2006, 12:02 PM
Windows 9 Will Merge Windows, Windows Phone, Windows RT in 2015
July 23, 2014, 3:33 PM
First Public Beta of OS X Yosemite Coming July 24
July 23, 2014, 11:08 AM
Google Promises to Fix 4-year-old Chrome Browser Battery Draining Bug
July 18, 2014, 9:16 AM
Microsoft to Cut 18,000 Employees, Phase Out Nokia X Android Smartphones
July 17, 2014, 9:03 AM
Quick Note: Nokia Devices Now Receiving Windows Phone 8.1 Update
July 15, 2014, 10:42 AM
Windows 9's Metro Start Menu Nears, Images Leak of Newest Build
July 14, 2014, 12:02 PM
Most Popular Articles
Microsoft Kills Entertainment Unit, May Shelve Flagship Lumia "McLaren"
July 18, 2014, 7:40 PM
Boeing 777 Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 Crashes in Ukraine
July 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
Google Signs Controversial Deal With Pharmaceutical Giant Novartis
July 16, 2014, 7:32 PM
Toyota Scientist: Autonomous Vehicles May Lead to Increased Fuel Consumption, Pollution
July 18, 2014, 2:42 PM
JJ Abrams Unveils X-Wing Starfighter for New "Star Wars" Movie
July 21, 2014, 12:24 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information