backtop


Print 66 comment(s) - last by tastyratz.. on Apr 4 at 11:03 AM


A comparison of bitrates between FiOS and Comcast reveals signals compressed up to 38%.  (Source: AV Science Forum)

Red Hot Chili Peppers live: crisp and clean on one side, a blocky mess on the other.  (Source: DViCE/AV Science Forum)
Comcast tries to fit three HDTV channels in the space of two

HDTV aficionados with Comcast service might be in for a rude awakening: the nation’s largest cable provider seems to have ratcheted up the compression on its cable HDTV signals.

A thread at AV Science Forum updated last Monday details what appears to be compression of up to 38%, allowing Comcast to deliver more HDTV channels per line while using the same amount of bandwidth. A side effect of this, however, means that HDTV’s pristine video is now jagged and muddy for Comcast customers, full of MPEG-style compression artifacts and stuttered movement:

For the most part, fine detail remains very good on static (non-moving) images with Comcast's added compression, but you do see reduced contrast, with more dithering artifacts (banding) between colors and objects. With some channels, it looks a bit like Comcast is taking a 24-bit image and reducing it to 18-20 bit. This tends to reduce the 'pop' effect in some images. The difference in 'pop' was quite noticeable on Food HD, despite the relatively small bitrate reduction.

The greatest differences are seen with movement. With slow movement on Comcast, the first thing you notice is added noise and a softer image, as fine detail is filtered from the picture signal. The greater the rate of movement, the more detail you lose and the more noise you see. With intense movement, you see more blocking and skipped frames. In VideoRedo, I noticed that a number of frames in the FiOS signal simply did not exist in the Comcast signal during motion intensive scenes. This may be responsible for the stutter and excessive motion blur seen with some video sequences on Comcast.

Still images comparing Verizon’s FiOS HDTV service with Comcast’s HDTV service, taken at the exact same time in the exact same broadcast, show Comcast’s images losing much of the legendary detail that HDTV is so well known for – in a screenshot  of the Red Hot Chili Peppers playing live in Milan, the Comcast image was almost completely stripped of all fine-grained detail; lead singer Anthony Kiedis’ textured wristband becomes flat and blocky, and the tattoo on his left arm made pixellated and blurry.

A request for comment was received by Comcast, but not replied to.

The purpose of Comcast’s increase in compression is unclear; however it would appear that the company is attempting to fit three HDTV video streams inside of one QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation, Comcast’s DTV broadcast format) signal, as opposed to the previous two. In a bitrate comparison between each provider’s broadcast of the same show, the Verizon signal was recorded at 17.73 Mbps, while the Comcast signal recorded at 13.21 Mbps, a 34% reduction in size.

According to Ken Fowler, the A/V buff known as “bfdtv” at AV Science Forum, Comcast’s compression increase currently affects most customers that were not originally in Adelphia’s cable system, which Comcast purchased in 2005. Further, the increased compression only affects national networks like A&E or HBO; local TV signals are rebroadcast at whatever bitrate they were originally sent in.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Funny it looks fine on my set...
By callmeroy on 4/1/2008 3:58:53 PM , Rating: 2
I live in a Condo, with homeowner association rules that I can't get FIOS installed, so I have no choice but Comcast. However, unless this compression stuff just started like -- TODAY...HD channels still look good on my set, except for some odd reason my TBS HD doesn't look all that much better than its non-HD counterpart, but aside from that I was watching Discovery HD and ESPN HD as recent as 11:30 PM last night and they both had *amazing* picture quality.

And btw, as a Comcast customer you only pay extra for the HD service if you aren't on a certain package or higher. I believe its something like the "Plus" or the "Silver" package or higher they waive the HD charges, you are just paying for the premium stations not the HD of them. Otherwise you pay extra for the HD as well.

Now that all said -- I'd leave comcast in a heartbeat if I was able to get FIOS service -- faster Internet and cheaper.

I only have Comcast for the cable Internet - I watch less than 6 hours of cable television per WEEK. Mostly I'm watching DVDs if I'm watching anything.

But I use my computer just about every day and no way I'm going back to dial up.




RE: Funny it looks fine on my set...
By fic2 on 4/1/2008 9:38:57 PM , Rating: 2
In this article:
http://www.dailytech.com/FCC+Says+No+To+Exclusive+...

it says,
quote:
Just last year, the FCC voted for banning contracts between cable operators and residential, multi-tenant buildings, claiming the same argument.

I tried to follow the link to the FCC website, but it is stale. I would bet Verizon could help you if you want to get FIOS.


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki