Print 115 comment(s) - last by nofranchise.. on Apr 4 at 7:58 AM

  (Source: Reuters)

A Chinese worker demonstrates how he will fire a barrage against errant clouds during the Olympics in August.   (Source: Reuters)
China will bring out the BFGs to try to make sure weather doesn't rain on its Olympics

China may have to worry about clouds of smog and black soot due to its lax environmental policies and large scale adoption of inefficient partial-combustion obsolete technologies, but one thing it won't have to worry about at the 2008 Beijing Olympics this August is rain – that is if everything goes according to plan.

China is leveraging its significant military resources to wage a war against Mother Nature.  China plans to deploy 20 anti-aircraft (AA) guns around the city, firing a steady barrage of special payloads containing silver iodide and dry ice into cloud cover, whenever it should appear.  The Chinese hope that this novel strategy will help make the Olympics rain free and perhaps give it a chance to show off its military prowess.

The country is so confident in its rain fighting powers that the 91,000-seat Olympic stadium, nicknamed the "Bird's Nest," has no roof.  The efforts are being led by the city's Weather Modification Office, a sub-branch of the China Meteorological Administration.  The AA/rocket launcher assault is only one phase of a three-pronged assault the Office plans to deploy against inconvenient weather.

The first phase is detection.  China will use satellites, planes, and radar to track incoming weather.  It will also leverage the power of an IBM p575 supercomputer, which the city purchased last year.  The computer is capable of doing a modest 9.8 trillion floating point operations per second and has enough power to accurately model by the kilometer hourly reports for the entire 44,000 square kilometer (17,000 square mile) Beijing area.

Upon detection, the second phase will commence, starting with a barrage from 20 ground-based sites encircling the stadium.  Two aircraft will also be scrambled to spray dry ice and silver iodide into the clouds in an attempt to stop them from reaching the stadium.

If rain manages to break through these barriers, China will deploy its weapon of last resort:  liquid nitrogen.  Aircraft will pummel the clouds with liquid nitrogen.  This, according to officials, will increase the number of droplets in the cloud, but reduce their size, making them less likely to fall.  Officials hope this last ditch effort might hold off the clouds long enough for them to pass safely over the stadium before releasing rain.

There is a 50 percent chance of precipitation during any day that month, according to past trends.  The games will occur during Northeast Asia's rainy season.  Zhang Qian, head of Beijing's Weather Modification Office, warns that past results for weather modification during heavy rain haven't always been successful.  However, he optimistically mentions, "the results with light rain have been satisfactory."

The Chinese government is working very hard to try to make the games a demonstration in the countries newfound power and prosperity.  The government spent $40B USD bringing 120,000 migrant workers (at $130 per month) into Beijing for the massive construction projects planned, starting in 2001. In all, 1.5 million people will be displaced by the new construction projects. 

China, with a population of 1.32 billion, has a penchant for excess; featuring the world's largest dam, the world's highest railroad, and in 2009, the world's largest Ferris wheel.  China's weather modification program will also be the largest in the world, when fully deployed.  It will feature over 1,500 weather modification professionals who will coordinate 30 aircraft and their crews, and a ground force of 37,000 part-time workers, mostly peasant farmers.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hello.. Gravity?
By Darkskypoet on 3/28/2008 3:43:24 AM , Rating: -1
Yep. Sounds tremendously like an industrial revolution to me. Except that there is far more dangerous things around today that can be abused, then when we all grew up. If we'd have had it, we'd have used it. Especially competing against other major powers to do it.

You also realize that a lot of this shit happens at the ignorance or behest of Multinationals right? Why do you think they move jobs, production and mfg overseas? Cause the poor countries have to offer something... they do their environment, workers, etc. Every state has to have a job.

We've decided to start them in the shit jobs, as we firmly believe in earning it. Their goal is industrialization. Their goal is to bring 1/4 of the worlds population into the modern world in 100 years. 1950's ish to 2050... It took us 150 years to do so with 17 or 18% of the worlds population...

Don't think for a second our system was built upon labour laws, human rights, etc. We employed kids, had slaves, were slaves, were piss poor wage earners, were factory owners, were old money. We did as much damage to our workforce, population, children, and indigenous populations as they are. We just did it in our past.

This is the largest industrial revolution EVER, their eventual skilled, trained, and disciplined work force will out number both the EU and US's workforces, and a domestic 'able to consume' market larger the 2 NAFTA's will exist...

The bee's suck... So did some of our mistakes. Our chemicals mess with us too, we stop using them, because we can afford the alternative, and really only because eventually enough lawsuits are filed that it becomes more expensive for the private firm to use them, then to adapt an alternative.

Shareholders then, and now don't often vote with their environmental convictions. They tend to want to maximize ROI...

Long story short, no other state on the panet has had to deal with what China is carrying out, no one. So get off the high horse, and realize that China has existed as a state far longer then any Western nation, and was once easily the strongest world power (1400's).

Its about pride and saving face, as much as anything else. Why is Putin having such a love in in Russia? He led them out of the Lost Decade. They are again a power, and not broken and battered.

Chinese people by and large want the good life, they also have a far longer history to exist within, and a scope that chronologically is practically unrivaled. 100 years is a worthy price to pay to get to a good stable economic, modern life. Especially if it brings pride back to her. Event he Chinese know that in this world you have to earn it. And so they get the jobs they can, and keep movin on up.

RE: Hello.. Gravity?
By Darkskypoet on 3/28/2008 3:44:39 AM , Rating: 2
Crap, myne replied to the wrong comment, even. Busy night.

RE: Hello.. Gravity?
By Fireshade on 3/31/08, Rating: 0
RE: Hello.. Gravity?
By seekerofknowledge on 4/2/2008 11:33:59 AM , Rating: 5
The bee's suck... So did some of our mistakes. Our chemicals mess with us too, we stop using them, because we can afford the alternative, and really only because eventually enough lawsuits are filed that it becomes more expensive for the private firm to use them, then to adapt an alternative

There’s one thing you’re leaving out: The First Amendment; along with freedom in general. People in China don’t have it. So there will never be any lawsuits on behalf of “labor laws, human rights, slaves, piss poor wage earners”, much less the environment. That said, I wouldn’t be defending China’s industrial revolution, or at least comparing it to that of the West.

Shareholders then, and now don't often vote with their environmental convictions. They tend to want to maximize ROI.

The purpose of any public company is maximization of shareholder wealth; don’t ever think that its purpose is anything other. While some may hold the belief that a few public companies have other, nobler causes that drive their desire to compete, it is nothing more than a marketing and public relations fallacy. Companies from all industries use marketing and public relations to build positive public images. In the end, companies from BP to Whole Foods Markets utilize the strategies necessary to maximize their shareholders wealth.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki