Print 64 comment(s) - last by afkrotch.. on Mar 31 at 1:26 PM

Microsoft data shows NVIDIA caused bulk of Vista crashes

When Windows Vista first hit market, some driver issues were to be expected as hardware manufacturers moved existing components to the new OS from Windows XP. As is natural for new items, the enthusiast community was among the first to embrace the new operating system.

The incompatibilities were part due to Vista incorporating Microsoft’s DirectX 10 promising better graphics and physics in PC games. At the time, the high-end G80 graphics cards were some of the most popular graphics cards on the market including the NVIDIA 8800 GTS, GTX, and Ultra.

NVIDIA had driver problems with of Vista and DirectX 10 from the get go and delayed their first driver from a December 2006 release to a January 2007 release. Even once the driver hit market, there were wide spread reports of crashes because of NVIDIA drivers.

The problem with reports of buggy drivers is that no one can really tell if the drivers are actually at fault, or if the computer experiencing the driver crash has some other underlying problem contributing to the crash.

As part of the ongoing Vista Capable class action lawsuit, Microsoft released data on exactly what drivers caused the bulk of logged Windows Vista crashes. The number one culprit of Vista crashes related to driver failure was NVIDIA at 28.8%. Microsoft only broke logged crashes out for a few companies including NVIDIA, Intel (8.8%) and ATI (9.3%). Microsoft’s data shows that it was responsible for 17.9% of logged crashes.

The main early adopters of Vista were PC enthusiasts; the hardware of choice for PC enthusiasts at the time was NVIDIA G80 GPUs so it would be natural that more crashes would be logged as caused by a NVIDIA driver. Ars Technica also points out that the Microsoft data doesn’t specify if the crashes logged are from multiple machines or a group of particularly error prone computers experiencing multiple crashes.

DailyTech reported on the original suit being filed in April 2007. The suit alleged that Microsoft knowingly deceived customers with Windows Vista. The suit was given class action status in February 2008.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

ok, so what about
By senbassador on 3/26/2008 7:06:10 PM , Rating: 1
the 71.2% of other crashes. Man, if I had a dollar for every time Word 07 crashed on me. And you can't attribute that one to 3rd party vendors.

The number one cause of crashes, at least to me anyway, seems to be the fact that Vista is a huge resource hog. Apparently running 8 firebox browsers, one Word 7, one eclipse, and a few other trivial programs is too much for my 1 gig of RAM to handle. Funny thing is, doing that with XP on a 768 MB of RAM ran just fine. Well, most of the time.

RE: ok, so what about
By ChronoReverse on 3/26/2008 7:13:21 PM , Rating: 2
Vista does have a higher overhead than XP. This should be plainly obvious. The extra Vista needs is about 512MB.

RE: ok, so what about
By BikeDude on 3/26/2008 7:35:47 PM , Rating: 2
Man, if I had a dollar for every time Word 07 crashed on me.

Kind of irrelevant, is it not?

This news blurb was about BSODs, not application crashes. If an application crashes, it is usually of little consequence. Other apps continue just fine and never misses a beat. If however a device driver throws a fit, then your system is completely fubar.

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki