backtop


Print 127 comment(s) - last by Fly1ngSqu1rr3l.. on Mar 29 at 2:31 PM


A defaced image of the website promoting the film, which was removed by ISP Network Solutions.  (Source: Klein Verzet)

The current notice appears when visiting fitnathemovie.com.  (Source: DailyTech)

The video and the site sparked a large protest Saturday in Amsterdam.  (Source: Fred Ernst / AP)
Dutch filmmaker Geert Wilders faced with possible removal by his ISP may seek possible alternate distribution means for his radical film

The Netherlands is becoming the surprising center of conflict over the extent of free speech, religion and allegations of racism.  The debate centers around an upcoming film by a local politician, which expresses strong criticism against Islam faith. 

Several Islamic government have sought to ban materials criticizing Islam.  The most recent example of this was when Pakistan blocked the website YouTube for promoting non-Islamic or anti-Islamic materials, inadvertently crippled the country's internet traffic.

Nearby Denmark found itself in the center of a similar controversy when a Danish newspaper aired cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, the most important Islamic historic religious figure, in an embarrassing light.  The cartoon led to protests worldwide outside Dutch embassies, death threats and at least one murder.

Now Holland is back in the limelight.  Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders, head of a reactionary party which controls 9 seats in the 150-seat Dutch Parliament, promoted his new film which portrays Islam in an extremely critical light, only to find his website taken down amid a storm of criticism.  The film was promoted on the site which formerly had a simple title image, the words "Fitna" ("Coming Soon"), and an image of a gilded Qu'ran. 

The website has since been taken down, and a note is posted stating that Network Solutions, the U.S. based service provider, is investigating whether the site violates its terms of service.  The note about Wilder's site states, "Network Solutions has received a number of complaints regarding this site that are under investigation."

Network Solutions hosts the website of Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based organization labeled by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization. 

While the company could not be reached for comment, its terms of service do include a broad provision banning, "objectionable material of any kind or nature."  While the former website gave scant details about the upcoming 15-minute film, to be released on March 31st, it is certain to be found objectionable by some.  Filmmaker Wilders says the film will underscore his belief that the Islamic holy book is "fascist."

Wilders prepared to distribute the video over the internet after being met with refusal from television stations unwilling to grant it airtime.  Wilders, who lives under police protection due to death threats, refuses to be deterred, and was quoted Dutch news agency ANP on Saturday stating, "How many ways are there left for me to be worked against?  If necessary, I'll go hand out DVDs personally on the Dam." The Dam is a colloquial name for Amsterdam's central square.

On Saturday protesters crowded the Dam to voice their distaste for Wilders.  Amid sleet and heavy wind, between 2,000 and 3,000 protesters of mixed ethnicities assembled "Netherlands Shows Its Colors" in an advanced reaction against the film.  Protesters carried signs such as "Standing Together Against the Right-Wing Populist Witch-Hunt." 

One protester, Elisa Trepp, said, "I'm very much against Geert Wilders and racism in general.  I think it's really important to show not only Holland but the rest of the world that there's a lot of people who do not agree with his ideas."

Hassan Iaeti, another demonstrator, traveled for hours to make it.  He states, "The government could really do something. That's in the interest of the country - stop him, just stop him."

Dutch officials fear that the film may spark violent protests worldwide.  Free speech in the U.S. is currently solely limited against making statements that would incite imminent lawless action (riots) as defined by the case Brandeburg v. Ohio.  Similar limits to free speech exist throughout much of Europe, much to the chagrin of free speech advocates.  As the video may spark worldwide lawlessness, the government may see it fit to block the video. 

However the government remains relatively apathetic to the situation by all indications.  No prominent politicians showed up at the protest.  Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende has said previously that he did not agree with Wilders views, but supported his right to free speech.  Balkenende did add that the video could threaten Dutch interests worldwide.

In Afghanistan protesters burned effigies of Wilders and demanded the withdraw of NATO-deployed Dutch troops from the country.  A Dutch court will hear complaints against the film lodged by Muslim groups, on March 28th, however Wilders can elect to release the film before then. 


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Truth or Consequences
By twnorows on 3/25/2008 12:37:58 PM , Rating: 2
"... objectionable material of any kind or nature."

To arbitrarily lump "objectionable material" and "TRUTH" together is an abomination. TRUTH should ALWAYS trump OBJECTIONABLE, otherwise we allow ourselves to be victims of censorship.

And what, exactly, is 'objectionable'? Does it mean that the 'wholier-than-thou' ragheads can't take the heat of others who truthfully and honestly identify their hypocracy so these grovelers resort to whining and complaining about the truth of the situation being broadcast to a wide audience -- and all they can say is that they find "objectionable"??

(notice that nowhere did they say it was untrue, just "objectionable").

Well HOO-RAH! live with it you sand fleas. When you start acting like real human beings, instead of suppressing women, and trying to kill everyone else who doesn't share your myopic, cranial-rectal ideology,... then - just maybe, you'll start getting some respect from the rest of us who are clear thinkers.

But until that happens, I have no compassion or tolerance for religious zealots who strap bombs on children to wage a RACIST holy war with everyone else on the planet. You're all just a bunch of racist, bigoted pieces of camel dung, and frankly -- I find you all ... (what's the word?), oh yes:

OBJECTIONABLE.

As Shakespeare said in one of this works, "me thinks that thou protests too much". Maybe because it's true? And their doctrine/ideology HARDLY qualifies as a true religion. Their deity is in his grave as a collection of rotting bones. However, the grave of Jesus Christ is empty. Nobody else's "god" has EVER come back from the grave. Not only are they hypocrates, they also have been swindled with lies and falsehoods about their so-called "god".

And to put "objectionable" into perspective, I consider Al G(wh)ore's fictional movie to be "objectionable material" because opinion - rather than truth - has been used to manipulate people. This guy [(wh)ore] is the ultimate hypocrate who has a wooden castle for a house and uses more electricity in a month than most readers use in two years. Further, he flies on a polluting private jet (instead of regular air) to promote his visual lies. Pretty Objectionable to me. How about you??




"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard

Related Articles
Pakistan Unblocks YouTube
February 27, 2008, 10:01 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki