Print 82 comment(s) - last by michael67.. on Mar 14 at 11:45 PM

Intel CEO Paul Otellini arrives at the EC hearing building in Brussels to argue Intel's case.   (Source: REUTERS/Francois Lenoir)
Chipmaker continues to plead its innocence before the EU

The European Commission (EC), the executive arm of the European Union (EU), has already brought one mighty opponent to its knees.  It fined Microsoft almost $2.6B USD overall for antitrust violations, including fines of $690M USD and $1.4B USD.  Microsoft tried to refuse to comply with EC's verdict, but ended up paying for it even more in the end.

Now the EU is pursuing chipmaker Intel for allegedly employing anticompetitive practices such as a price slashing and illegal rebates to drive smaller chipmakers out of business.  The EU issued formal charges against Intel in July.  Intel responded quickly that the charges were nonsense and that AMD was the one complaining, not the customers.  AMD claimed that Intel reaped $60B USD in monopoly profits.

Intel fought back demanding a hearing before the EC where it could argue its viewpoint.  Meanwhile, Intel suffered another loss when its German offices were raided last month by EU agents, who seized documents applicable in the antitrust case.  Germany was one of the countries in which Intel is allegedly to have employed price manipulation and illegal rebates.

Now Intel has finally gotten its way, in effect, as it had a chance to plead its case before an EC hearing.  Intel's chief executive Paul Otellini travelled to Brussels to represent his company at the hearing.  Intel, whose chips are in four out of every five of the world's servers and PCs, has also been accused by the EC of paying off computer manufacturers to pick Intel chips over AMD chips.  Intel has denied these claims saying it competes fiercely and legally.

Mr. Otellini addressed Hearing Officer Karen Williams, arguing that Intel's financial practices were well within the law and that its success was from having a better product, not illegal maneuvers.  Ms. Williams will report to Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes on the case at the end of the hearing. 

Commissioner Kroes, who recently championed the $1.4B USD fine against Microsoft, will make a final suggestion to the full European Commission about Intel's fate and the amount of a possible fine.  Fines can be up to 10% of a company's global revenue, under EU business law.  Commissioner Kroes previously stated that Intel may be a larger threat to E.U. business then Microsoft.  Following Commissioner Kroes statement, the EC will put the issue to a vote and come to a judgment.

Intel had most of the day yesterday to plead its case.   It discussed proprietary information during the hearing, requiring several participants to have to leave for extended periods.  The U.S. Federal Trade Commission and New York attorney general's office, who are investigating possible Intel antitrust violations within the U.S, were both represented.  It is expected that they may launch similar antitrust campaigns following in the EU's footsteps.

Today several consumer groups will have their chance to speak.  BEUC, a European umbrella group for consumer groups, and individual groups from the Netherlands, Spain and France will all be represented.  The groups so far have not come out with a firm stance on the allegations, but Monique Goyens, BEUC director general assured, "We may do so later."

She further stated that BEUC wants to ensure that consumer issues about pricing and innovation are properly examined and addressed.  AMD and Hewlett Packard are also both going to speak today.  Their accounts and testimony will be critical as their relationships with Intel figures heavily with the charges leveled against the chipmaker.

The EU, in addition to the Intel office raids, raided multiple retailers that sold only Intel chips and not AMD chips.  The materials gathered in these raids cannot be used in the hearing.  However the EC could elect to issue new charges against Intel at any point.  It did so three times during the Microsoft case, so such a result is not unexpected.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: More European = Communist Comments
By pauluskc on 3/12/2008 12:01:45 PM , Rating: 0
I think it's great that they fine "criminals".

As long as I've been alive, the GBP has been worth 1.6x (or more) as much as the USD. This has nothing to do with them needing the money or not. Never a thought in my mind.

So where does the money go, that's my question. Innocent. Honest. To fight criminals sounds like it greases a select few people's pockets and that's about it. Show me the good these fines are doing, and I won't ask the question.

To prosecute the criminals? Sounds like my favorite local police practice of stopping people 2 MPH over the limit to issue fines at the end of the month. Helluva fundraising technique. And they wonder why people don't wanna just pay more taxes.

RE: More European = Communist Comments
By nofranchise on 3/12/2008 12:06:40 PM , Rating: 3
You people crack me up again and again.

"Show me the money!" - The money is being spent the same way tax is being spent. On government - or in this case - Union expenses...

You actually believe the fines "grease" a select number of people??? Yeah - that's believable - wouldn't it be easier to ACCEPT bribes from Intel in the shadows than host an open trial with huge press???

Oh I forgot, the EU WANTED bribes but the cute and cuddly Intel from butterscotch mountain wouldn't do it, so now the eeeevil EU has to steal it away! Stand and deliver!

By hathost on 3/14/2008 4:42:40 PM , Rating: 2
Except that there is no such thing as government having enough money. If the government taxed everyone 100% they still wouldn't have enough it the nature of gov't.

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki