backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Mar 11 at 2:48 AM


Intel says that its upcoming SSDs will better Samsung's offerings in performance.  (Source: Samsung)
Intel to boost performance of its next generation SSDs

In late December, Intel launched its Z-P140 PATA solid-state disks (SSDs). The tiny drives measure just 12x18x1.8mm and power consumption is equally miniscule with readings of 1.1mW while idle and 300mW during read/write operations.

When it comes to performance and storage capacity, however, the Intel SSDs are a little behind the times. The Z-P140 can only be had in storage capacities of up to 16GB while read/write speeds come in at just 40MB/sec and 30MB/sec respectively.

Intel looks to leapfrog its current offering later this year with new multi-level cell (MLC) chips which will be used in 1.8" and 2.5" SSDs. According to Intel's NAND Products Group guru Troy Winslow, the drives will be available in capacities ranging from 80GB to 160GB.

Intel also plans to take on the best from Samsung and BiTMICRO in terms of performance. Samsung's current MLC-based 128GB SATA-II SSD achieves read speeds of 100MB/sec and write speeds of 70MB/sec. "What I can tell you is ours is much better than that," said Winslow in an interview with CNET.

"When Intel launches its...products, you'll see that not all SSDs are created equal," Winslow added. "The way the SSDs are architected, the way the controller and firmware operates makes a huge difference."

Intel's SSD, like the offerings from Samsung, will use the SATA-II interface.

As more manufacturers step up to produce NAND flash memory for SSDs, one of the few remaining drawbacks for the storage solution will being to subside: the high price of entry. Opting for a 64GB SSD on a MacBook Air will set you back a whopping $999. Adding a 64GB SSD to Dell's XPS M1330 will cost you $650.

Intel feels that pricing will continue to trend downward in the coming months. "Price declines are historically 40 percent per year," Winslow continued. "And in 2009, a 50 percent reduction, then again in 2010." Samsung flash marketing manager Michael Yang recently stated that SSD prices will fall 35 to 45 percent year-to-year.

Hopefully, the estimates on price reductions for SSDs will hold up as production ramps up. Most major manufacturers (Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc.) offer SSD options on their notebooks. ASUS has shown that it move a large quantity of SSD-equipped notebooks -- when the price is right -- and it looks to go for a knockout punch with its second generation Eee PC 900.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: All I want...
By mindless1 on 3/11/2008 2:30:42 AM , Rating: 2
Do you see that the storage capacity of a typical PC has gone up year after year? Which allows a smaller case, one 5.25" drive or two 3.5"? Consider before you answer that we have to have the 5.25" bay for an optical disc, with Blu-Ray coming optical discs were not just here but still bringing new tech to PCs in the future.

What is needed instead is not a reduction in width as a typical PC needs at least 5.25" width (make it 5.5" including side case walls) but rather a reduction in height and depth. Typical case has PSU above motherboard, meaning there is space for a deep optical drive but the adjacent bays either have to be further forward making a case deeper, OR the drives need to be shorter length. Once you get away from mechanical HDD you don't need a long rectangular shape anymore like you do with the head/arm assembly behind circular platters, rather it could be very short instead about like turning a 3.5" mechanical drive sideways, or even shorter!

Likewise with the height, if each is not as tall the remaining limit is the size of the motherboard and PSU, but the width constraint remains because of everyone using tall heatpipe based coolers.

Why do you think we need the reduction of a PC footprint so much though? Part of a desktop's virtue is anyone fairly mechanically inclined, even someone who isn't can deal with the size and complexity of assembly without having to use surgical tools (I'm not giving up my forceps for changing jumper settings though!).

Smaller is not always better, the world is not imploding and there is much to be said for having an expanse - including that modern systems create more heat and the physical size of a typical PC allows for use of a larger, lower RPM, quieter fans.

I don't understand this insatiable lust for more space at all costs either, but it is you that has the lust wanting PCs smaller so you have more remaining space!


"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki