Print 45 comment(s) - last by djc208.. on Mar 16 at 10:00 AM

Toshiba Corp. President and CEO Atsutoshi Nishida was a strong supporter of his company's new U.S. nuclear initiatives  (Source: REUTERS/Toshiyuki Aizawa)

The new company will market Toshiba's advanced 4S reactor design. This small reactor design is made to power a small town with a minimal footprint, as pictured here.  (Source: Toshiba and Westinghouse)
Toshiba looks to help satisfy the growing demand for nuclear power in the U.S.

Nuclear power may have its critics, which argue that it isn't a viable large-scale replacement to fossil fuels, but enthusiasm for nuclear power continues to mount in the U.S. and abroad.

Also, nuclear is being embraced not just for alternative energy, but also for medical and research purposes.  Worldwide need for medical isotopes was brought into sharp focus when a reactor in Canada was forced to close, and then due to the medical crisis that ensued, swiftly reopen.  The end results is growing public support for nuclear-driven technology.

In the U.S. alone, electric utilities have announce plans to construct 30 new plants in coming years.  Among these is NRG Energy's application, which was the first application for an entirely new plant in 30 years.  Many of the new construction projects will implement sophisticated technologies such as advanced boiling water reactors (ABWR) and pressurized water reactors (AP-1000).  These designs will offer additional improvements in efficiency, safety, and output over current designs.

Toshiba is looking to jump onboard the burgeoning nuclear market.  It announced today that it has created Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation, a new company that started this month.  The company, based just outside Washington D.C., will enhance the existing nuclear lines of business which Toshiba held.  Its primary initial focus will be on promoting and marketing the advanced boiling water (ABWR) nuclear power plant design.  It will also provide support for related services.

As the new company grows, Toshiba wants to expand its capabilities to include licensing and engineeering support for technologies to go into new nuclear plants in the future.  Toshiba and Westinghouse, a Toshiba Group company have both been working to promote the ABWR and AP-1000 reactor designs.  The new company will add more market and support resources to these efforts.

Toshiba's new company has a workforce of 30 employees.  This number is expected to greatly expand, once construction on the various plant proposals in the U.S. begins in full, which is projected to occur around 2011.  At this point, Toshiba explains, it will also add engineering support staff at liason offices near the sites of construction. 

Toshiba and Westinghouse focus on the development, implementation and marketing of operation and maintenance (OP&M) technologies, technologies to keep plants running in peak shape. Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation will rely chiefly on Westinghouse for these OP&M capabilities in America.  The new company will also help network Westinghouse's construction management talent, which has been cultivated during construction projects in Japan.  The company will also support older PWR and BWR designs.

Perhaps most exciting the new company will help to promote the 4S reactor design.  This design is a small, and extremely simple and safe system, which offers great promise for distributed nuclear power generation.  Toshiba also announced that it may use the new company to help participate in the Next-Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) project. 

Toshiba calls nuclear power, "a cost-efficient long-term energy source, a powerful tool in the fight against global warming, and an integral part of a future hydrogen economy." 

Its new line of business will also market nuclear power in Europe, Asia and North America.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By spluurfg on 3/6/2008 5:41:31 PM , Rating: 1
I still haven't figured out how this is relevant to the article. Toshiba wants to build nuclear power plants, but you want the fuel stored in highly centralized locations. Is this supposed to mean that you don't want Toshiba to build nuclera plants?

You are aware that there are other nuclear power plants scattered throughout the country? And one reason they aren't all in one place is because the further you transmit alternating current the more power you lose along the way? And at any rate, the nuclear fuel is imported from other countries?

D for effort.

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By deeznuts on 3/6/2008 5:59:14 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think he's talking about plants being scattered around the country, as they already are. But he's talking about numerous smaller plants being scattered around every region. So instead of one Plant (like San Onofre, or TITS) that supplies all of Southern California, the region would be served by multiple, smaller plants.

Perhaps most exciting the new company will help to promote the 4S reactor design. This design is a small, and extremely simple and safe system, which offers great promise for distributed nuclear power generation.

You gave him a D for effort. What should we give you? Also grades for reading comprehension and assumption skills. ;)

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By spluurfg on 3/6/2008 6:30:30 PM , Rating: 2
Hehe, fair enough, I was skimming too quickly -- I take it all back and give myself an F =)

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By spluurfg on 3/6/2008 6:36:04 PM , Rating: 2
However, to address his (very reasonable) point, apparently the 4s design of nuclear reactor has the actual reactor core deep underground and does not need to be refueled for decades, so it's unlikely that it will need to maintain unused fissionable material on site in general -- only the hot material should be on site when not refueling.

It's also liquid sodium cooled, which might alleviate the worries about water consumption, but of course has its own issues (is sodium self regulating?)

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By djc208 on 3/16/2008 10:00:32 AM , Rating: 2
Nuclear plants don't really "consume" any water after initial fill. The system is a closed design so new water is added as other water is removed (for sampling, volume changes due to temp fluctuations, etc.)

The water removed is highly filtered and usually re-used, though even if not re-used it is usually about as clean as you can get water without making it in a lab.

The advantage of sodium is that you can run at higher temperatures without having to design for the higher pressures of a pressurized water reactor. The tradeoff is you have to desing and work with liquid sodium.

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By deeznuts on 3/7/2008 12:40:55 AM , Rating: 2
I can appreciate a man who admits his mistakes. Cheers!

RE: Not a good idea IMO
By spluurfg on 3/7/2008 9:49:31 AM , Rating: 2
Heh well not only that but I was being kinda mean too, so only fair that I get to eat some humble pie =P

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki