Print 71 comment(s) - last by Belard.. on Mar 13 at 12:01 AM

The reference rendering for how the Acid3 test should look.  (Source: Web Standards Project/DailyTech)

Current versions of both Internet Explorer 7 (top) and Firefox 2 (bottom) fail the Acid3 test catastrophically.  (Source: Tom Corelis/DailyTech)
Putting browser makers on notice, again

Just a few months after the announcement that Internet Explorer 8 successfully passed the Acid2 standards compliance test, the Web Standards Project (WaSP) announced last Monday that it unleashed Acid2’s successor, Acid3.

Created to identify flaws in the way a browser renders its web pages, WaSP’s Acid tests throw down the gauntlet with difficult-to-display graphics written to accentuate browsers’ quirks. When the original Acid test was released in 1998, it helped reign in browser inconsistencies and insured that Internet Explorer, Netscape, and others handled HTML code according to specification – making web designers’ lives easier and ensuring the web rendered consistently in the future.

Acid2, with its focus on Cascading Style Sheets, seems quaint in comparison to Acid3’s objectives, which target major web standards expected to see use today and in the future. Tests are derived from many of the last few years’ development in the web’s control languages, including rendering graphics embedded in HTML code, CSS3 compliance, DOM compliance, CSS2 downloadable fonts, as well as handling new graphics formats and Unicode support.

Currently, no known browser is able to correctly render the Acid3 test, which displays an animated, incrementing score counter and a series of colored boxes with some description text. Bloggers have already assembled galleries of browsers’ failing test results, with most of today’s browsers scoring between 40 and 60 on the test’s 100-point scale. The results shouldn’t be too alarming as the Acid tests have always been forward-looking in nature, and are designed to measure standards to aspire to, as opposed to what’s current. Also note that more than six months lapsed between Acid2’s release and Safari 2.02’s announcement that it was the first to pass Acid2.

Anecdotal reports around the web seem to indicate that nightly builds of the next versions of Firefox and Safari are reportedly achieving Acid3 scores in the 80-90 range.

Given the state of the web today – where web designers will often write two versions of a web site: one for Internet Explorer and one for everyone else – Microsoft’s announcement that Internet Explorer 8 passed Acid2 is all the more important. Currently, each new version of Internet Explorer keeps older versions’ flaws for compatibility, resulting in a confusing state of affairs for web developers.

The release of IE7 complicated matters further, as it shipped with both an IE6-compatibility mode and a somewhat-standards-compliant IE7 rendering mode, with an easily overlooked method for switching between the two.  As a result, Internet Explorer earned a nasty reputation among web design circles, with developers writing safe, proven websites that worked universally instead of rich websites that exercised their languages’ full features.

In time, it is hoped that Internet Explorer 8 will see the end of this rift, as it will ship with the new Acid2-passing standards-compliant mode switched on and used by default. For those that want to test Internet Explorer 8 out on your own, Microsoft already released the Beta 1 version of the browser.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By BladeVenom on 3/6/2008 12:22:40 AM , Rating: 2
Looks like:
1. Firefox 3
2. Firefox 2
3. Camino 1.51
4. Opera 9.24
5. Safari
6. Internet Explorer 7
7. Internet Explorer 6

RE: Ranking
By piroroadkill on 3/6/2008 2:23:18 AM , Rating: 2
I thought latest builds of webkit were way in front

RE: Ranking
By Zurtex on 3/6/2008 5:54:01 AM , Rating: 2
Yep, way way in front. And Opera 9.5 Beta is about the same as Firefox 3 Beta / Nightly.

Here's the Firefox tracking bug:

Here's the webkit tracking bug:

I don't know about webkit, but Firefox has no plans to finish the Acid test for version 3, will probably try and make it for Firefox

RE: Ranking
By killerroach on 3/6/2008 10:16:40 AM , Rating: 2
That being said, the most recent Firefox 3 nightly does score better than the Beta 3 of Firefox 3... (66 versus 58, and looks halfway resembling intelligent output, albeit still in black and white).

RE: Ranking
RE: Ranking
By smitty3268 on 3/6/2008 2:50:34 PM , Rating: 2
WebKit (Nightly - rev. 30790) 90
Firefox 3b4 67
Opera 9.50 65
Konqueror 4 63
Firefox 3b3 59
Firefox 2 50
Konqueror 3.5.8 ~50
Opera 9.26 46
Safari 3.0.4 39
IE 8b1 17
IE 7 6-12 depending on installed plugins

RE: Ranking
By neunon on 3/7/2008 2:25:34 AM , Rating: 2
Internet Explorer 5.5 manages to pull a 14 out of its hat. It beats both IE7 and IE6 (which both get 12s).

"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki