Print 83 comment(s) - last by idconstruct.. on Mar 5 at 7:50 AM

Intel's "Silverthorn" processor was designed from scratch to deliver about the same processing power as the original Pentium M processor in a 2.5 Watt envelope

Intel's new Centrino and Atom branding
10 Watts, 4 Watts -- why stop there? Intel debuts 0.6 Watt x86 processor

A flurry of announcements and roadmaps from Intel this week shed light on the company's 5.5 Watt Penryn and the 4 Watt Diamondville processors.  The company went one step further today, claiming it can get a fairly powerful x86 processor down to 0.6W for ultra mobile devices.

Intel first brought us news of Intel's Silverthorne processor in April of last year. At the time, details were light on the processor and it was just known as a successor to the 90nm Stealey-based A100 and A110 that were introduced at the time.

As the months progressed, more details began to leak out regarding the Menlow platform and the Silverthorne processor. Today, Intel officially pulled the wraps off the Silverthorne processor and the Menlow platform.

Silverthorne, a two-issue processor designed from the ground up, is now known as the Intel Atom processor. Atom processors based on Silverthorne are aimed at Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs).

To confuse matters a bit, Intel’s Diamondville processors will also fall under the Intel Atom processor nomenclature. Diamondville-based Atom processors are derived from Silverthorne, feature SMT technology and will be available in both single core and dual core versions. Atom processors based on Diamondville will see duty in low-cost notebooks (known as "netbooks") and desktop computers (also called "nettops").

As previously reported by DailyTech, Diamondville-based Atom processor will fit within a 4W (single core) to 8W (dual core) TDP envelope. The single core, Diamondville-based Atom 230 will launch at 1.6GHz and will feature a 533MHz FSB and 512k of L2 cache. TDP for the Atom 230 is listed at 4W.

Silverthorne-based Atom processors heading for MIDs will have a TDP ranging from 0.6W to 2.5W and will top out at 1.8GHz.  Sources inside Intel hint that the 0.6W version of the processor reaches just over 500 MHz.

Anand Lal Shimpi conjectures on the difference between the two cores. "Intel lists the 1.6GHz Diamondville TDP as 4W, a bit higher than what you'll see in MIDs but I'm guessing it'll run at a higher voltage and thus be a higher yielding part that's cheaper to produce, resulting in the higher TDP."

Intel confirms Diamondville will be the first Intel processor to support simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) since the Pentium 4.  The entire Silverthorne architecture supports SMT, though Intel has only confirmed Diamondville processors as SMT-enabled at this time.

Intel says that a single Atom processor measures just 25mm2 and contains over 47 million transistors. According to Intel, 11 Atom processors would fit on a penny and it's built on Intel's high-k 45nm manufacturing process.

"This is our smallest processor built with the world's smallest transistors," said Intel's Executive Vice President and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer Sean Maloney. "This small wonder is a fundamental new shift in design, small yet powerful enough to enable a big Internet experience on these new devices. We believe it will unleash new innovation across the industry."

The overall Menlow platform is now known as Intel Centrino Atom. The Intel Centrino Atom platform will include an Intel Atom processor, Intel 945GSE chipset and a wireless radio.

Although Intel expects the bulk of its Atom processors to see duty in MIDs, netbooks and nettops, the company also sees the huge potential for sales in consumer electronic devices, embedded applications and thin clients.

Consumers can expect to see the next generation Eee PC with an Intel Atom processor onboard -- HP may be wise to include an Intel Atom on its 2133 sub-notebook, but rumor has it that the company already decided on a VIA platform.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The dual-core one...
By stmok on 3/2/2008 11:18:12 PM , Rating: 2
I'm definitely considering this for a 24/7 Linux-based fanless PC. (keep it lean and optimized for this processor).

Of course...It all depends on the cost.

Anybody want to buy a VIA Mini-ITX mobo I have here? 1 year of use. Has VIA 1Ghz "Nehemiah", with 1GB RAM. :)

RE: The dual-core one...
By Joz on 3/2/2008 11:56:36 PM , Rating: 2
can i drop in an Isaiah latter on?

RE: The dual-core one...
By Lonyo on 3/3/2008 7:34:12 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously, VIA have been doing this sort of stuff for years, but no one cared until now.
They were ahead of the game really, but no one wanted to buy the products they were making because they were for a niche market.
Now we see the Eee PC and both AMD and Intel racing to get products to fit into the market that aren't just underclocked versions of existing products.

Where's the love for VIA?
They really need to do some big press releases and stuff and show the world what they've already got.

RE: The dual-core one...
By Joz on 3/3/2008 1:38:56 PM , Rating: 2
yea...I been thinking (and saying) that for a few years.

Expecialy after the C7-M wooped on the Celeron M and Pentium M.

RE: The dual-core one...
By Oregonian2 on 3/3/2008 3:21:38 PM , Rating: 2
They may have just been too ahead of the market that they can be put into (in larger volumes). EEE's still aren't a huge market yet, so far it's only the forcasts that are good sized. Or maybe there are systemic issues with the circuitry and/or support issues with software/hardware/firmware support by their respective companies. These kind of parts are more than just the IC's themselves. Or even perhaps their hardware bug lists.

RE: The dual-core one...
By bupkus on 3/3/2008 11:31:56 AM , Rating: 2
Of course...It all depends on the cost.

I first bought a D201GLY "Little Valley" and then its successor, the D201GLY2. Both are now in service but if the 1.8GHz Diamondville comes in with a motherboard at a similar price point I'll be in for a few.

RE: The dual-core one...
By arazok on 3/3/2008 12:34:16 PM , Rating: 2
I'm wondering if this would up to the job in a windows home server. Sound's perfect for it.

RE: The dual-core one...
By imperator3733 on 3/4/2008 9:54:16 AM , Rating: 2
That's a good idea.

WHS needs a 1.0GHz PIII equivalent CPU (from Wikipedia). I don't know if that would work, since Atom is an in-order core. You would need the fastest core, at the very least.

RE: The dual-core one...
By marco916 on 3/3/2008 4:19:09 PM , Rating: 2
Thats what I was just thinking, this is a good thing for Linux users. You could build a nice small desktop to run all your favorite apps in a tiny box. I wouldn't mind having a desktop the same size or smaller then my Wii box. Would save me all sorts of room, space.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki