U.S. Air Force Censors Blogs
February 28, 2008 5:10 PM
comment(s) - last by
The newly created "Cyber Command" Now controls the Air Force Network Operations Center and bans blog content.
(Source: Air Force)
China, Turkey, Pakistan ... the U.S. Air Force? The Air Force adopts strict new anti-blog computer policy
U.S. Air Force
has adopted an alarming new censorship policy that effectively
bans blogs and blogging by troops using Air Force computers and networks
. The U.S. Army has required that bloggers register with their chain of command, but has encouraged them to write appropriate postings. The Air Force, which did not adopt such a policy, now has turned to a much more restrictive policy that bans any site using the word "blog" in its URL.
The Army reviews its soldiers blogs to be redacted for sensitive information before soldiers can publish them. This is meant to protect
U.S. secrets from accidentally being exposed
. However, soldiers are welcome to speak freely in their blogs and visit blog sites.
The Air Force feels differently, and states that blogs and various other news entities are "not legitimate new sources."
The new policy is partly due to new leadership. Before the Air Force's internet issues were handled individually by each major command. These separate units had the right to control their users' access as they saw fit, according
The Air Force Times
. Now the internet policy has been placed under Cyber Command, which now regulates the Air Force Network Operations Center (AFNOC) in its entirety.
The new ban by the AFNOC's new leadership eliminates access to all sites hosted by popular provider
. Other blogs and news sites, not containing "blog" in their URL are
based on "content reviews performed on the base, command, and AFNOC level" according to
The Air Force Times
. AFNOC utilizes the Blue Coat Software to categorize sites by content and speed the blocking process. Says Tech. Sgt. Christopher DeWitt, a Cyber Command spokesman, "Often, we block first, and then review exceptions."
Maj. Henry Schott, A5 for Air Force Network Operations, tried to clarify the stance, stating, "The idea isn't to keep airmen in the dark -- they can still access news sources that are primary, official-use sources. Basically ... if it's a place like
The New York Times
, an established, reputable media outlet, then it's fairly cut and dry that that's a good source, an authorized source."
Many, though feel that such decisions are highly subjective and that some blogs can provide as good or better news coverage, in some cases, than that of major news outlets. These people will likely point to the recent court rulings that have granted bloggers journalistic protection, legitimizing their profession, at least from a legal standpoint. Others take offense with the new policy as it blocks materials that could be valuable for training and preparedness.
One Air Force officer, who wished to remain unnamed,
the following story
: "A couple of years back, I fought this issue concerning the
. An [Air Force] professional education course website recommended it as a great source for daily worldwide [counterterrorism] news. However it had been banned, because it called itself a blog. And as we all know, all blogs are bad!"
Content filtering is relatively widespread in the military, though not on this scale. Previously YouTube and MySpace were banned by the armed forces for taking up too much bandwidth. The Army has also been concerned with the large amount of leaked pictures, video, and information appearing online. Still many including Gen. David Petraeus, who commands U.S. forces in Iraq, have commended military bloggers and state that they're performing a vital function.
Many in the Air Force are furious at the new policy. Writes one senior officer, "When I hear stuff this utterly stupid, it makes me want to scream ... Piles of torn out hair are accumulating around my desk as we speak. I'm certain that by blocking blogs for official use, our airmen will never, ever be able to read them on their own home computers, so we have indeed saved them from a contaminating influence. Sorry, didn't mean to drip sarcasm on your rug."
While the Air Force spends $81M USD to publicize its new advances, an Air Force officer states that the regulation of blogs has undermined "some of their most credible advocates." He points to such sites as
In From the Cold
, a right-leaning military, intelligence and political affairs blog written by "Nathan Hale," the pseudonym for a former journalist and Air Force intelligence officer, who served for over two decades in the armed forces.
He states, "The Air Force
isn't getting the planes that they want
because they are incapable of communicating their usefulness and applicability in this new war. Because Air Force officers talk more like corporate bureaucrats than cocky war fighters, no one is inspired or convinced of their pressing (and quite legitimate) need to modernize the force. Air Force bloggers spoke the lingo of someone heavily invested in the fight, because they operate outside the survival-minded careerist world of public affairs, with many of them penning blog posts from theater."
U.S. has been highly critical of other nations
, such as
China's internet censorship efforts
attempts to silence bloggers
. The new policies by the United States Air Force are certain to strike many as a bit hypocritical in this regard.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
This is NOT censorship!
2/28/2008 8:16:18 PM
The word "censorship" has lost all its legitimate meaning. An organization (including a government branch like the air force) that places restrictions upon use of its resources by its employees etc. is NOT engaging in "censorship" -- censorship is NOT any act by any party that frustrates the aspirations of another. Censorship is government force applied to private parties trying to express their views exercising their rights to property, association, and trade. If an ISP offers to publish my blog, that is fine. If they do not agree to publish my blog that is fine. (Both are private parties exercising their free rights.) If the government threatens me or the ISP with force for publishing (or not publishing) the blog, THAT is censorship.
I can see any number of reasons why the armed services would not want their resources used for blogging etc. The purpose of the army is to defend our country, not satisfy the journalistic aspirations of servicemen. If armed forces personnel want to blog, they should do it on their own time and not using the government resources.
Sheesh. Sensational journalism at its worst.
RE: This is NOT censorship!
2/28/2008 8:33:47 PM
Here is one definition of censorship. Does it fit the bill? Block websites anybody?
The control or regulation of speech and other forms of human expression, usually imposed by the government or some other powerful group of people. The purported purpose of censorship is to protect people from being exposed to thoughts or ideas that would be hurtful, disturbing or damaging for them to experience.
RE: This is NOT censorship!
2/28/2008 10:20:08 PM
except you know, they're only blocking it on THEIR computers and THEIR network, which is supposed to be used for work anyway. And like what others have said, I've yet to see a base where you can't get internet access yourself for personal use, especially in CONUS.
This is essentially like complaining about not being able to watch and download porn on your computer at work.
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
U.S. Air Force B-2 Stealth Bomber Crashes in Guam
February 23, 2008, 8:24 PM
Pentagon Reportedly Wants Additional F-22 Fighters
December 3, 2007, 9:52 AM
Former Pilots, Officials Want UFO Probe Investigation
November 19, 2007, 11:52 PM
"Internet Dissent" Key Issue in U.S.-China Commission Results
November 16, 2007, 10:06 AM
UC Davis Discovers Inner Workings of China Firewall
September 17, 2007, 1:07 PM
Commercial Drones to Get Privacy Guidelines Via Executive Order
July 25, 2014, 5:34 PM
Pentagon's Priciest Project, F-35, Misses International Debut
July 25, 2014, 10:18 AM
Temple University Researchers Hit the Delete Button on HIV, Remove it from Human Cells
July 22, 2014, 7:39 AM
Airbus Shows Off All-Electric E-Fan 2.0 Airplane, Plans Production in 2017
July 21, 2014, 9:29 AM
Buzz Aldrin Says First Astronauts to Set Foot on Mars Should Never Return Home
July 9, 2014, 9:46 AM
Women May Soon Be Able to Control Their Fertility via Remote Control
July 7, 2014, 10:14 AM
Most Popular Articles
JJ Abrams Unveils X-Wing Starfighter for New "Star Wars" Movie
July 21, 2014, 12:24 PM
Ford Details ’15 F-150’s 325hp, 2.7L EcoBoost V6; Demonstrates 732-lb Weight Loss
July 22, 2014, 6:55 PM
Comcast Memo: Harassing Customers During Retention Calls Actually IS Our Policy
July 22, 2014, 5:19 PM
Kindle Fire Phone Review Roundup -- A Solid "Meh"
July 23, 2014, 2:09 PM
Motorola Moto G Successor Reportedly Uncovered, Moto X Discounted by up to $75
July 21, 2014, 1:11 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information