Print 80 comment(s) - last by rcc.. on Feb 29 at 4:24 PM

332 MPH fly-by at 28 feet in a Boeing 777-300ER  (Source: Liem Bahneman)

First comes the champagne, then comes the axe.  (Source: Telegraph)
Cathay Pacific pilot fired for 28 foot fly-by in a brand new Boeing 777-300ER

When it comes to American commercial airliners, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner has received the majority of the press for the past two years. The 787 uses advanced engines and composite materials to achieve remarkable fuel economy for an aircraft its size.

However, the older Boeing 777-300ER is making news due to the actions of one daring pilot. Captain Ian Wilkinson decided to make the most of the maiden voyage of the Cathay Pacific 777-300ER by showing off the capabilities of the aircraft.

Captain Wilkinson made a 332 MPH pass of the airport control tower at a height of just 28 feet. Onboard the aircraft were Cathay Pacific airline executives who were "stunned into silence", while on the ground stood cheering ground crew.

"We heard afterwards he was asked to do a fly-by of the factory and decided to give them a flight they would never forget," said one Cathay Pacific inside. "But why he chose to do it with the chairman on board is anyone's guess."

Passengers and the flight crew of the brand new 777-300ER toasted Captain Wilkinson with champagne after the fly-by. That might have been the end of the event if it weren’t for the Internet -- a video of the low fly-by found its way to YouTube and Wilkinson soon was suspended, and then later fired for his actions.

"If no one else had found out about it, the incident would probably have gone no further, but once it began circulating on the internet and Hong Kong's Civil Aviation Authority got hold of it, that was the end of him," said a senior pilot for Cathay Pacific.

Captain Wilkinson, who has lived in Hong Kong for the past 15 years, is said to be considering an appeal of his termination -- considering that Wilkinson was pulling down nearly $500,000 USD a year as a pilot, it a near certainty that he will go through with the appeal.

"Wilkinson was showing off, and most of the pilots might be sympathetic, but they feel that he got what he deserved when he was sacked," added Cathay Pacific senior pilot who wished to remain nameless.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Good show.
By 306maxi on 2/27/2008 5:10:35 PM , Rating: 1
You clearly don't have an idea what he's doing...... have you ever flown an aircraft? Probably not! Why don't you leave the discussion to people who understand the issues at work here. IMHO he wasn't behaving that irresponsibly but that's just me.

RE: Good show.
By Veedee on 2/28/2008 8:09:49 PM , Rating: 2
Why don't you leave the discussion to people who understand the issues at work here

Ok why don't you. Here's something for you that you probaby didn't consider. For this numbnuts to do the flyby, gear up at 300 knots, no flap with all the GPWS warning systems he has on board as well as his ECAM and EFIS restrictions, he had to turn off critical warning systems and fly the plane by hand. Now I don't know if you have any idea what those acronyms stand for and frankly I don't give a rat's %@#. This idiot not only violated a large number of FARs but put himself, his passengers and even those cheering fools on the ground at great risk. Another point, since he most probably turned off his GPWS system, he had no idea how far his tail was off the ground. Figure it out dude. How far is he from the tail, what is the angle of attack of the aircraft as well as the deck angle and how long is the jet. He had no clue and was just a lucky SOB. As for leaving the discussion to those that know what they are talking about, I think you better make like a tree and GTFO.

RE: Good show.
By ikkeman on 2/29/2008 11:39:58 AM , Rating: 2
You clearly don't have an idea what he's doing

I have flown and do fly - smaller aircraft to be sure, but still.
I'm an aeronautical engineer. I constantly read about mishaps, incidents and accidents caused by pilot bravado or ignorance.
What's your claim to knowledge???

IMHO he wasn't behaving that irresponsibly but that's just me.

He either was or was not behaving irresponsibly. If he was behavining irresponsibly he was behaving unprofessionally. When you stop beeing a professional when piloting a potential weapon of mass murder - you deserve whatever you get (within the law)

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki