Print 26 comment(s) - last by xiv.. on Feb 26 at 10:33 PM

Microsoft opens the floodgates for XP SP3 RC2

While Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) has received the bulk of the attention for the past few months, there's another service pack eagerly awaited for Windows users: Windows XP SP3.

Microsoft released SP3 to testers last week, but the general public can now download the service pack via Windows Update. Users have to first download a small registry file from Microsoft which gives them special access to Windows Update to download SP3.

"The script sets a registry key on your system. The registry key is required for Windows Update to recognize your machine as a valid target for Windows XP Service Pack 3 RC2," states Microsoft. "It is recommended that you apply the resulting update package to an activated, genuine copy of Windows XP, in a test environment."

Users are also asked to remove any previous beta or release candidate versions of SP3 before proceeding with the latest update.

Some of the new functionality included with SP3 include Black hole router detection, Network Access Protection, Credentials security service provider and the Microsoft Kernel Mode Cryptographic Module.

Microsoft says that the RTM version of Service Pack 3 will be available during the first half of 2008. If all goes well with RC2 testing, we should see the final code shortly.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: i'm just waiting for it to be slipstreamable
By NinjaJedi on 2/20/2008 12:45:21 PM , Rating: 2
I just reinstalled XP with SP2 2 days ago (I do a fresh reinstall about once a year.) and I had 90 patches on the first update. I had about 4 or 5 after the restart. It took about 10-15 minutes to download and install the 90+ patches. WOW that took so long. So even if you don't install SP3 you will still sit through 90+ patches. Is the extra 20+ (With SP3) minutes of updates really suffering? It took me longer to reinstall the drivers/software for everything else then it did the updates. Even if/when XP CDs come out with SP3 on them you still sit through the install of it. So you are only eliminating the download part. WOW 10 minutes extra is a real drag.

By ThePooBurner on 2/20/2008 3:15:10 PM , Rating: 2
You are forgetting those that don't want to use IE7, which is forced onto you if you use windows update to patch. Or those who might not have a computer that would do the updates in that little time. I know when i had to update this box after 2 years on the shelf it took more than an hour.

By NinjaJedi on 2/20/2008 4:23:24 PM , Rating: 2
I did not forget IE7 because I installed IE7 and it only took an extra minute or two. Cant you just uncheck an item before you start the download or use the *custom* instead of *express*? Also Since the guy I was responding to says he is upgrading I would assume that he will be doing it with up to date hardware. A dual/quad core CPU and more RAM does really help though. Having a raptor probably didn't hurt me any either. I still don't think an extra 10 or so minutes of downloading SP2 patches and SP3 is "suffering"

By callmeroy on 2/20/2008 4:24:19 PM , Rating: 2
You are forgetting those that don't want to use IE7, which is forced onto you if you use windows update to patch.

Since when? Just do the custom option and remove IE7 from the update. Unless they changed this VERY recently (just did a custom Windows Update last week and didn't install IE7).

By kzrssk on 2/20/2008 6:34:52 PM , Rating: 2
There's the regkey that blocks IE7 from Windows Update. And, in a pinch, even if you accidentally download it, it will prompt you before you install it if you really don't want to.

RE: i'm just waiting for it to be slipstreamable
By RamarC on 2/20/2008 9:20:36 PM , Rating: 2
if you only had 4-5 patches after the first update then you're not installing everything. wmp10 must be installed seperately. ditto with ie7. (why would anyone stick with ie6 and it's incompabilities?) both require reboots. there are multiple patches for msxml which upgrades itself sequentially. same with the .net framework.

i need a slipstream because installing sp2 on top of wmp10 and ie7 breaks those apps. and it screws up .net 3.0 assemblies, visual studio 2008, and a few other development tools because it literally pulls the rug out from under them.

By NinjaJedi on 2/20/2008 10:21:04 PM , Rating: 2
Nope I only had 4 or 5. I ran the express to check for high priority and there were none after that. I did not install wmp11 or .net or msxml I only did express. There are 16 patches under custom that I did not install. 12 software and 4 hardware. I really don't feel the need to do anything that is not high priority. Maybe that's good maybe that's bad but its worked for me.

"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki