backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by scosiae.. on Mar 3 at 6:56 AM


New Australian legislation would put copyright infringers under a "three strikes" policy. The third strike would result in ISP account termination.  (Source: Sony Pictures)
The Aussies look to follow a British proposal to force ISPs to terminate filesharers

In what could be described as a filesharer's worst nightmare and the RIAA's sweetest dream, Great Britain and now Australia are debating legislation that seeks to force internet service providers (ISPs) to drop customers whom are found to be downloading copyrighted material.

The International Federation for the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), a media watchdog and parent of the RIAA, championed the efforts.  It says that over one billion songs in Australia alone were downloaded illegally, yearly, costing the music industry an untold fortune in revenue.

The new Aussie and British legislation calls for a three strikes policy.  A first offense, which the government categorizes as accessing music, TV shows and movies illegally, would result in a warning letter from your ISP.  A second offense would result in a temporary suspension of your ISP account.  A third strike and you're out -- the ISP would terminate your account.

Australian Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said the Government was aware of the music industry's stance that ISPs should be legally forced to adopt a music industry sanctioned code of conduct.  It also is aware of the similar pending British legislation.  Conroy states, "We will also examine any UK legislation on this issue [including any three-strikes policy] with particular interest."

Music Industry Piracy Investigations general manager Sabiene Heindl put in over a year of lobbying to try to get the effort through.  She says 2.8 million Australians downloaded music illegally last year, and not enough is being done to stop them.  She argues, "Because P2P file sharing involves these music files sitting on individual people's computers, there is very little that MIPI can do to remove those files or stop them being shared.  That's why we have been pushing a proposal to internet service providers for a commonsense system of warning notices which, if unheeded, would ultimately result in a user having their account suspended or disconnected."

ISPs are unhappy with the move.  National Internet Industry Association chief executive Peter Corones plans on airing his constituents’ complaints to Mr. Conroy later this week.  Mr. Corones argues that current penalties are "stiff enough".  In Australia downloading music can land you injunctions, damages and costs, fines of up to $60,500 for individuals and up to $302,500 for corporations per infringement and up to five years' jail -- nothing to sneeze at.  Corones argues, "Internet service providers are not the enforcers of copyright."

The statement is a sharp juxtaposition to ISP policies in the U.S. and abroad.  In recent months, it has been revealed that Comcast and other ISPs indeed "police their connections" by throttling P2P traffic, a policy which may be illegal.

The new legislation will likely anger Australia's youth.  In a survey of Australians between the ages of 10 and 17, 63 percent felt there was no point paying for music and it should be freely available, mirroring the music industry's worst fears.  Unfortunately for these young people, the days of carefree downloading may soon be at an end.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I see the future ...
By stmok on 2/19/2008 5:44:20 AM , Rating: 2
As an Australian, I've already stopped with music, movies and TV shows. I've decided to seek out classical works, literature, looked at other cultures, meet the people that create such works, etc. (Its actually far better than the crap that's been generated out today).

This Govt (Labor) wants to push mandatory content filtering for all ISPs. Their excuse is porno. ie: "Think of your children!"

What's wrong with the approach is that to opt out, you need to contact your ISP, so you're put on a whitelist. (Such a list can be used by authorities).

The previous Govt (Liberal) provided content filtering software for free to all Aussie families, letting them choose whether they want filtering or not. They knew it would be realistically unworkable to enforce mandatory content filtering at the ISP level.

Now, this Govt (Labor) brings up this "3-strikes you're out" nonsense? Realistically, its not gonna work. Which Aussie ISP is gonna suspend the very people that are their source of income? (Aussie ISPs have it tough as it is, why make it worse?)

On a side note: the Australian version of the RIAA is the ARIA.
...Notice how its the same 4 letters? :)

What I find problematic about this Govt, is that they have little knowledge about technology and the consequences of implementing such measures. I find this unfortunate.


RE: I see the future ...
By SavagePotato on 2/19/2008 8:58:31 AM , Rating: 2
The ARIA, thats aweseome, all you have to do is put N on the end of it and they become the music nazis.


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki