Yahoo Rejects Microsoft, Wants More Money
February 11, 2008 11:49 AM
comment(s) - last by
Yahoo's rejection is sure to hurt for Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, who had previously expressed great enthusiasm for the potential deal.
Microsoft loses bid for Yahoo and must choose between a fully hostile bid, a higher offer, or waiting for Yahoo to fall further on hard times
The Microsoft-Yahoo saga, which played out over the last couple weeks, began with
Microsoft making an unsolicited offer
for internet giant Yahoo. The plot thickened with the
resignation of Chairman Terry Semel
from Yahoo's board, and a
Google threat of legal action
to block the move. While many analysts considered the deal a shoe-in, initial analysis of Yahoo's willingness to accept the deal in the first place was apparently off the mark.
Inside sources had warned that CEO Jerry Yang, who held considerable sway over the final decision had been very wary of Yahoo getting digested into the Microsoft empire. These sources had called
such a development "Jerry's worst nightmare."
Perhaps they should have been heeded sooner.
In a move which had been forecast since late last week, Yahoo's board on Monday
formally rejected Microsoft's $45B bid
. The rejection made it clear that the board felt that anything less than double its stock price would be too little. Yahoo would accept an offer of $40 per share or higher, significantly more than Microsoft's offer, which equated to about $31 per share.
The statement from Yahoo's board, attacked Microsoft's offer as cheap, stating, "The board believes that Microsoft's proposal substantially undervalues Yahoo, including our global brand, large worldwide audience, significant recent investments in advertising platforms and future growth prospects, free cash flow and earnings potential, as well as our substantial unconsolidated investments."
This contrasts Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer's valuation of the Yahoo, in which he called his company's bid "generous."
The board made it clear that its ears would be open to a higher bid from Microsoft or other investors, stating that Yahoo "is continually evaluating all of its strategic options in the context of the rapidly evolving industry environment."
Yahoo struggles are evidenced by
and a 2008 forecast that many in the investment community considered disappointing. Some see Yahoo's move and simply a gutsy attempt to try to get Microsoft to up its offer. One thing that may stand in the way of this, though, is lack of competitive interest. After Google's criticism, it is unlikely
would field a bid, and it might not be able to even do so, due to possible violations of antitrust laws stemming from a Yahoo-Google merger. Fox owner Rupert Murdoch, known for buying up properties, has also stated that he has no interest in Yahoo.
As no one else has showed much interest in struggling Yahoo, Microsoft may feel little need to rush, and may alternatively choose to sit back and wait like a vulture circling a tired beast, ready to strike when Yahoo's circumstances make it more willing to deal.
Another possibility that remains is that Microsoft could make a fully hostile bid and bring its offer directly to Yahoo's shareholders, attempting to outmaneuver the board. Such a move might work, but would risk seriously damaging its future prospects, if it was rebuffed.
rejected a Microsoft bid in 2006 and 2007 in private talks
, but this offer was Microsoft's first public bid; and also its first public rejection. Microsoft refused to comment, so its next move is anyone's guess. Microsoft, though, had previously made it clear that it considered the move an essential step for both companies, stating, "Today, the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers and publishers."
With the prospect of such an alliance evaporating almost as quickly as it was born, the news is surely a disappointment to Microsoft's leadership.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Much Ado About Nothing
2/11/2008 5:08:31 PM
I don't know. It seems strange to me that you think offering the stock price would be good value. Effectively, the stock price is the average of what people on any given day are willing to pay for the stock that is available. It is really only an estimate at best, because it only looks at active sales. If I own stock worth $30/share, it doesn't mean I'm willing to sell the stock for that price.
Another aspect to look at is potential value. Let's say the stock is sitting at $30, but analysts have suggested that it could grow to $50 within 18 months. Would you then accept $30 for something you believe is worth $50 in a short period of time?
RE: Much Ado About Nothing
2/11/2008 5:31:29 PM
On the other hand, if someone offers you $31 for a stock that was priced at about $20 days earlier, and that stock has a good potential to keep falling going forward (due to lackluster financial performance of the company), the smart thing is to take the $31.
Clearly Yahoo's board feels they are in a position to negiotiate - good for them. But based on their recent track record, as well as the strength of their main competitor Google, I think they're being foolish. I doubt they're going to get a better offer.
RE: Much Ado About Nothing
2/11/2008 10:05:51 PM
Internet services will inevitably grow in the future, it's not as though there are only 4 aces in a deck and Google wins for having them all. Yahoo's future has everything to do with whether they can accurately project the public's needs online and advertise their services effectively. If they feel the bid from MS was too low, they must have a reason to believe it. They'd certainly have a better understanding of their business than we do, as they're not jonny come lately.
"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton
Google Reinvents the Boring Old Search
February 7, 2008, 1:20 PM
Microsoft May Borrow For Yahoo Deal, Talks Still Heating Up
February 6, 2008, 10:51 AM
Google Plans To Fight Microsoft-Yahoo "Monopoly"
February 4, 2008, 10:37 AM
Yahoo Chairman Resigns, Microsoft Bid Offering Heats Up
February 1, 2008, 11:51 AM
Microsoft Offers to Buy Yahoo for $44.6 Billion
February 1, 2008, 10:00 AM
Facebook CEO Called President Barack Obama to Complain About NSA Spying
March 14, 2014, 1:40 PM
Quick Note: Google Drive 100GB, 1TB Plans See Major Price Cuts
March 13, 2014, 2:45 PM
Target Missed Early Warning Signs of Holiday Data Breach
March 13, 2014, 1:45 PM
Amazon Increases Prime Subscription to $99/year Starting March 19
March 13, 2014, 8:23 AM
Bitcoin King's American Accounts Get Frozen
March 13, 2014, 3:00 AM
Time Warner Cable CEO Says Merger with Comcast is a "Dream Combination", Will Increase Innovation
March 12, 2014, 2:37 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information