Print 83 comment(s) - last by oab.. on Feb 8 at 9:23 PM

Intel says competitors to Apple can use the CPU found in the MacBook Air; 45nm CPU refresh coming this Fall

When Apple unveiled the MacBook Air most every technophile stifled a lustful moan.  However, the paltry specifications included in the Air leave something to be desired -- even to the most ardent of Steve Jobs protégés.

PC manufacturers expect to fill the gap. InformationWeek reports that two PC makers will release similarly size Windows systems using the miniaturized Core 2 Duo processor found in the svelte MacBook Air. 

The low-voltage Core 2 Duo processor found in the MacBook Air is not present in any other computer to date.  Some would claim Intel designed the processor specifically for Apple, though Intel roadmaps designate the ultra-low voltage processor as "publicly available" to any system integrator. 

The low-voltage Core 2 Duo played a big part in the ability for Apple to make the Air so thin. The processor is built on the older Intel Merom processor family, though the "mini" version is 60% smaller that other Merom processors.

The 1.6 GHz Core 2 Duo certainly won't set any speed records.   In fact, the 65nm processor first got its debut at 1.8 GHz in 2006.  Similar performing 65nm Yonah processors at 1.8 GHz debuted almost a year before that. 

Intel announced its 45nm processor line last month, just a week before the MacBook Air announcement.  However, those interested in sacrificing performance for slim footprints won't have to wait long: Intel's corporate roadmap claims 45nm versions of Penryn, the current processor generation, will be available this fall.

Even if PC manufacturers incorporate the mini Merom processor in upcoming notebooks before this Fall,  Apple will certainly opt for the 45nm processor in the next-generation MacBook Air. 

Intel has not released the names of the PC manufacturers anticipating to release slim PCs based on the "mini" Merom processors.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why so slim?
By PandaBear on 2/1/2008 8:54:11 PM , Rating: 2
It helps if you need to bring it around in a back pack, but I think people that need to bring a laptop around in a back pack won't spend $1800 for a laptop.

RE: Why so slim?
By 9nails on 2/1/2008 9:00:14 PM , Rating: 5
For $1800, I think I'll just get 2 or 3 regular laptop's and leave them all over the places that I go!

RE: Why so slim?
By MADAOO7 on 2/2/2008 3:29:14 AM , Rating: 2
I think people that need to bring a laptop around in a back pack won't spend $1800 for a laptop.
change the word "back pack" in that last phrase to "briefcase" and you'll realize exactly who this laptop targets.

RE: Why so slim?
By mcnabney on 2/2/2008 1:38:03 PM , Rating: 2
Oh yes. The business market is definitely going to ditch everything and go with an Apple. Ultralightweights, and yes even thin and wide laptops like this, have been around for a long time. Nothing new here except Steve Jobs.

RE: Why so slim?
By oab on 2/8/2008 9:23:31 PM , Rating: 2
Not that thin.

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki