backtop


Print 92 comment(s) - last by kiwik.. on Feb 8 at 1:23 AM


The front image for The Pirate Bay was redecorated in celebration of the site's victory, which its administrators feel is inevitable.  (Source: The Pirate Bay)
Site’s admins denounce accusations as idiotic

Making good on a promise tendered last week, the country of Sweden pressed charges against four ThePirateBay.org administrators, accusing them of conspiring to break Swedish copyright law.

According to prosecutor Håkan Roswall, the BitTorrent supersite commercially exploits copyright-protected works through ad revenues, of which it nets over $3 million annually.  The four men charged include The Pirate Bay co-founder Peter “Brokep” Sunde, administrators Gottfrid Svartholm and Fredrik Neij, and businessman/entrepreneur Carl Lundström, whose company once provided hosting for the site. Authorities specifically named 33 different copyrighted works, comprising of 20 songs, nine films and four computer games for which The Pirate Bay made torrents available illegally.

Roswall says that the four should be made to pay at least $188,000, which the indictment says is the minimum profit that The Pirate Bay made from its activities. If convicted, they could face up to two years in prison.

IFPI chairman John Kennedy says The Pirate Bay is primarily interested in “making money, not music” and that the site turned Sweden, which is “normally the most law abiding of EU countries,” into a copyright charlatan, with “intellectual property laws on par with Russia.”

Despite the accusations, The Pirate Bay seems unfazed. “In case we lose the pending trial (yeah right) there will still not be any changes to the site. The Pirate Bay will keep operating just as always. We've been here for years and we will be here many more,” writes an unnamed administrator on the site’s official blog, before pointing out that Swedish police could have “saved a hell of a lot of trees” by posting the 4,620 pages of legal documents against Sunde and friends – available for approximately $1000 USD – in a PDF torrent on the site.

The Pirate Bay says that it hosts close to a million torrents, which point to files on users’ computers that are distributed across the BitTorrent network. The site maintains that it does not host nor trade in infringing material, an accusation that Sunde dismissed as “idiotic” in an interview with Reuters conducted earlier last January.

BBC’s dot.life blogger Darren Waters believes The Pirate Bay – as opposed to other torrent supersites – was targeted because of its openly defiant attitude and historic resilience to legal threats; the site keeps an online graveyard of sorts littered with takedown notices and administrators’ sarcastic responses. The Pirate Bay’s adversaries include almost every major copyright organization on the planet, as well as numerous artists, software developers, and filmmakers.

Thus far – with one exception, due to a police raid in May 2006 that knocked the site offline for a few days – The Pirate Bay continues to operate unrestricted.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Humane Laws
By xsilver on 2/2/2008 1:46:27 PM , Rating: 3
all valid points masher, but I think it fundamentally comes down to either
a) you view people as fundamentally good and willing to freely share
b) fundamentally bad, willing to profit from the suffering of others and in your example, spy.

In our hearts I think each of us would like to think we are option A but in our minds we know better and realize that some people are going to be option B
So does that mean we've become a society that tolerates the suffering of others based solely on economic status?

I mean, its not great when pharm companies are clamoring for loopholes to extend their patents in order to make some billionares, multibillionares.
Conversely I'm not naive enough to think that if everything was freely shared some of us wouldnt take advantage and progress would stagnate.

Do you think the patent office needs to take a harder stance on blatant cash grabs? I do.


RE: Humane Laws
By dever on 2/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Humane Laws
By jtemplin on 2/2/2008 3:00:04 PM , Rating: 2
On what basis are you making these wild assumptions about his inner motivations. I think he raises an interesting philosophical question.


RE: Humane Laws
By mindless1 on 2/2/2008 5:15:44 PM , Rating: 3
You are clearly deluded if you think those who make the most money do so becaues they produce superior goods and services.

It's usually the opposite, those with the most study their market, make cost concessions, advertise, and directly combat their competition in an effort to beat the competition to take more profit, not to produce superior goods.

Others voluntarily reward them? Nonsense, when you or I go to a store to buy something we are not thinking "reward", rather than choosing what best meets all our needs based on what is available. The availability factor is the problem, that there's more to what products and services are available and presented than simply what is superior. The idea you have of an economically free environment ignores practially all the things required to succeed in such an environment as it exists today.


RE: Humane Laws
By jconan on 2/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Humane Laws
By Keeir on 2/2/2008 9:54:48 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So does that mean we've become a society that tolerates the suffering of others based solely on economic status?


Since when are people entitled to share in every advancement or nearly free supplies of medicine? At most people are entitled to live with as little laws or constrictions on their personally choices as be made without the destruction of others' freedom of choices.

quote:
all valid points masher, but I think it fundamentally comes down to either
a) you view people as fundamentally good and willing to freely share
b) fundamentally bad, willing to profit from the suffering of others and in your example, spy.


You left out a bit
- Addition to a) - and will continue to innovate and perfect products, ideas, and methods with no tangible reward

c) fundamentally lazy, and will only work hard to better their own life or position relative to other humans


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki