Google Fights Domain Name Tasting
January 28, 2008 4:32 PM
comment(s) - last by
Domain name tasting left a bitter flavor in Google's mouth, and it vows to take serious action against offenders
Internet giant Google continues
its battle against evil
by taking a
hard stand against so-called "domain name tasting."
Domain name tasting is a practice in which people purchase attractive domain names, and then take advantage of the grace period, returning them a few days later only to rebuy them again. This may continue many times as they both make advertiser revenue, and examine interest in the domains. The process has become largely automated, and millions of domain names lie in the hands of a small group of entrepreneurs at any given time.
Critics complain that the grace period, once used to safeguard legitimate users from mistakes such as domain name misspellings, is now put to use for gross abuse of the online system. The domain name hoarding that occurs, comes at virtually no cost to the buyer, but hurts businesses and individuals who have legitimate interest in the domain names. Many claim that this abusive practice eats up all the good domain names, so honest users are left with few options.
In the past one lure to domain name taste was the potential advertising revenue. Google has now vowed to put this to an end. It has said it will begin examining domain names that are repeatedly dropped and then repurchased and within a few weeks its AdSense program will ban these domains from receiving advertising dollars.
Google spokesman Brandon McCormick lauded the move saying, "We believe that this policy will have a positive impact for users and domain purchasers across the Web."
Warnings of the new policy were sent out to AdSense customers last Thursday.
Jay Westerdal of
blog says the move will prove a serious obstacle to would-be domain name tasters. He says, "If Google and Yahoo are not monetizing these types of sites, I think domain tasting as we know it will come to a screeching halt. The alternative advertising is just not as effective."
already led the charge against tasters, suing several domain name registration companies and trying to block advertising to tasters.
The key oversight agency of the Internet, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, has been examining the issue and closes its public comment phase today. The operators in control of the ".org" suffix have already changed its rules so that companies are charged for multiple returns. This has led to a sharp decrease in returns. In only a month the number of deletions went from 2.4 million in May of last year to 152,000 in June, once the policy was enacted.
These new rules along with the
extension of the Internet tax ban
in U.S. should help to make the Internet more free and accessible to the legitimate users and businesses.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Multiple return fees should be implemented
1/29/2008 8:25:59 AM
I think the example of the .org domain changes by charging for multiple returns is great. Why that does not apply across all domains is beyond me. That would lead to a much cleaner healthier web of content and help get rid of the junk nobody wants to see.
I personally would like to see ICANN maintain a blacklist of sorts which is then sent to all registering companies.
Domains tasters and front runners could be monitored at a ratio. Anyone with more than 3 domain returns, 30% or larger return ratio of domains purchased (whichever is greater) per calender year should be red flagged. The % could be sized up and down depending on results.
That way small businesses can have a couple returns for legitimate mistakes, and larger companies are allowed the elbow room. Anything over that amount would be considered abuse.
I'm glad Google is making a step in the positive direction for the online community. They still make a % on clicks even on tasters dont they?
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
Google: Wiping out Evil, One Negative Political Campaign at a Time
January 25, 2008, 3:04 PM
Yahoo Trades Pink Slips for Greenbacks
January 22, 2008, 4:24 PM
Let the Good Times Roll: 7 More Years of No Internet Tax
October 26, 2007, 1:59 PM
"Bitcoin COO" Explains Bitcoin to Conan O'Brien in Layman's Terms
March 11, 2014, 9:53 AM
Comcast Paying Millions to Congress to Solidify Time Warner Cable Acquisition
March 10, 2014, 8:25 PM
AT&T Cuts Price of 2GB Shared Data Plan, T-Mobile Ups Cost of Unlimited Option
March 10, 2014, 2:51 PM
Sprint Chairman Says Carrier Still Interested in T-Mobile Purchase
March 10, 2014, 2:11 PM
Vine Users No Longer Allowed to Post Pornographic Videos
March 7, 2014, 1:47 PM
Facebook Launches Slightly Tweaked News Feed
March 7, 2014, 9:03 AM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Bitcoin King: Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès' History of Arrests, Firings
March 5, 2014, 9:05 AM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Apple Won't Let UK Sons Unlock Their Deceased Mother's iPad
March 6, 2014, 12:44 PM
Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014, 9:45 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information