backtop


Print 94 comment(s) - last by Christopher1.. on Feb 2 at 12:51 AM

Stunning new filtering plan contradicts its “Your World” marketing campaign

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson confirmed that the telecom and internet giant is “very interested” in a “technology based solution” to monitor data passing through its networks for rogue peer-to-peer traffic.

“It’s like being in a store and watching someone steal a DVD,” said Stephenson. “Do you act?”

Such a move would affect more than just AT&T’s subscribers, as the company’s network investments represent a sizable chunk of the internet’s backbone – which results in almost all Internet data passing through its network at some point. Given that AT&T has, so far, been pensive about the scope of such a project, many are assuming the worst.

More importantly, AT&T may forfeit its end of the deal in what Slate’s Tim Wu calls “the grand bargain of common carriage:” legal immunity from whatever claims might arise from data its network transports, in exchange for offering network service to anyone in a nondiscriminatory fashion. “AT&T's new strategy reverses that position and exposes it to so much potential liability that adopting it would arguably violate AT&T's fiduciary duty to its shareholders,” writes Wu.

In an absence of any official word on why AT&T wants to implement such a project, many people think that the primary motivator is an alarmed response to the growing percentage of traffic attributable to P2P activity; various surveys claim that anywhere from 30 to 90 percent of all internet traffic is P2P related. Lately, ISPs both large and small have been testing the waters with a variety of traffic-shaping initiatives, including Comcast, which last year found itself in the middle of a scandal over how it handles BitTorrent traffic.

According to AT&T – as well as anecdotal reports and commentary from other ISP employees – Internet users should expect a more managed Internet experience in the near future, as technology is finally becoming sophisticated enough to allow for such large-scale projects.

“We recognize we are not there yet but there are a lot of promising technologies,” said AT&T executive James Cicconi, “but we are having an open discussion with a number of content companies … to try to explore various technologies that are out there.”

If anyone has the expertise to deploy such a large filtering project, it would be AT&T: the company was already caught red-handed with powerful data-mining hardware, which it used to gather information on the nation’s web traffic for the NSA.

“The volume of peer-to-peer traffic online, dominated by copyrighted materials, is overwhelming. That clearly should not be an acceptable, continuing status,” said NBC Universal’s general counsel, Rick Cotton. “The question is how we collectively collaborate to address this.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Wrong analogy, AT&T
By winterspan on 1/26/2008 7:55:04 PM , Rating: -1
Where in the hell did you get the idea that you can just arbitrarily assign the status of "public sphere" to P2P activity?
As an example, I currently use P2P technology to transfer files between a computer at my house and one which I leave at a friend's house. MY DATA is going through this communication method. How is that any different than sending email? How would that NOT be the same type of invasion of privacy as searching through my email?
You cannot just start filtering a whole technology because some use it for nefarious purposes. That is just crazy.

As a poster said above, this is all a load of bullshit. The only reason AT&T suddenly becomes Hollywood's favorite buddy is because THEY WOULD LOVE to cut out 50% of the total bandwidth they provide, especially on the upstream side.

Besides, piracy as a % of P2P traffic is probably at it's all time high. As soon as large scale PAID HD movie rental/download systems start to utilize the technology, along with all the video podcasts, game downloading, etc that currently use p2p technology, It will become much more important as a general service.

This type of behavior just continues to reinforce the absolute need for internet neutrality legislation to keep these fuckers eyes and hands off of our traffic. a packet is a packet is a packet.

Vote for Obama! He actually understands the need for comprehensive broadband legislation! :
http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060608-network_neu...


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki