backtop


Print 17 comment(s) - last by Jedi2155.. on Jan 29 at 1:13 AM


An artist's conception of BepiColumbo in orbit around Mercury

A test of NASA's NSTAR ion engine
Probe to use advanced "Star-Trek" type engine

Few space propulsion technologies have generated as much recent interest as the ion engine. This weekend, the ESA announced it will it an advanced ion thruster to propel an upcoming probe to study the planet Mercury.

The mission is named BepiColumbo after Giuseppe Columbo, a pioneering scientist in the study of Mercury. It will launch in 2013 and arrive six years later. BepiColumbo will be the ESA's first mission to the hot regions of the solar system well inside the Earth's orbit. While approaching Mercury, the spacecraft will have to endure extremely hot temperatures on its sun-facing side, and extremely cold temperatures on the side facing away from the sun.

One of the primary goals of the mission is to discover whether pockets of water ice exist on Mercury's cold, shadowed side.

The ion engine will be built by Astrium, a subsidiary of the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS). It uses an electric field to propel ions, or electrically-charged atoms of xenon gas to extremely high velocities, giving it an efficiency far above that of chemical-based engines. Its performance, if converted into earthly units, would equate to 17.8 million miles per gallon.

Electro-propulsion specialist Howard Gray says, "Ion propulsion will be a key technology for a series of future long-distance exploration missions. Today's agreement puts British scientists and engineers in a strong position in Europe to take a lead role in adopting these systems for future spacecraft."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Good performance, but is it fast enough?
By InternetGeek on 1/21/2008 9:14:04 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Its performance, if converted into earthly units, would equate to 17.8 million miles per gallon.


Anyone knows how much faster is the impulse compared to traditional propulsion methods?




By masher2 (blog) on 1/21/2008 10:31:29 PM , Rating: 2
You really can't rate space propulsion by speed. There really isn't a top speed; you can accelerate until you run out of fuel. Since the limiting factor is fuel, fuel efficiency (technically, "specific impulse") is what's important.

NASA's achieved specific impulses of up to 8000 seconds on ion engines. For comparison, the space shuttle main engines generate about 400 seconds. That means, given the same amount of reaction mass, the ion engine would wind up going 20 times as fast.

That ignores differences in engine weight between the two...and also the fact the space shuttle has about 100,000,000 times the thrust.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki