Print 39 comment(s) - last by HighWing.. on Jan 22 at 2:31 PM

An example of an EPC RFID tag in use at Wal-Mart  (Source: Wal-Mart)
Wal-Mart plans to strong-arm suppliers into using its RFID tagging system

RFID already has a bad rap largely due to the unsavory prospects of human implantation, possibly by employer coercion.  There is a significant public wariness to the technology, which largely stems from these issues, which unfortunately causes people to often overlook its practical business uses.

By using RFID tags during shipping, pallets of goods can easily be located, identified and tracked as they move across the country.  This can lead to great cost savings while enhancing the supply chain.  Such devices operate in either the 433 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency, and thus pose no more electromagnetic radiation concern to users than the myriad of other wireless signals that surround us in our daily lives.

Wal-Mart adopted RFID early and has since pushed its suppliers to adopt the system, which it feels is revolutionizing its shipping processes.  For three years now the company insisted its suppliers RFID tag shipping pallets for its Wal-Mart retail and Sam's Club warehouse stores.

Now Wal-Mart is using Sam's Club as a proving ground for the new technology, by economically forcing its suppliers to adopt the system.  The new, more forceful, push will begin with Walmart's DeSoto, Texas distribution center that distributes pallets to Sam's Club stores across the southwest.  Starting January 30, all pallets entering the center must be RFID tagged or suppliers will face fines of $2 per untagged pallet.

An RFID tag costs about 20 cents to manufacturer.  Wal-Mart explains that the significantly larger fee is not designed to be punitive, but covers the costs of labor for Wal-Mart having to reprocess and tag the pallets themselves.  The fee allows companies without existing RFID infrastructure to temporarily pay Wal-Mart to deal with this issue, giving the supplier time to adopt RFID logistics.

Sam's Clubs 700-stores accounted for $41.5 billion of Wal-Mart's $344.9 billion in revenues in 2007.  The stores use fewer suppliers than the Wal-Mart retail chain, so the company sees them as an ideal proving ground for the technology.

The system and accompanying fines for non-comformers will be phased in at all 22 Wal-Mart distribution centers over the next three years.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By GhandiInstinct on 1/18/2008 3:22:33 PM , Rating: -1
A new breed of criminals.

They'll cut you open searching for your RFID to use just like stealing a credit card.

"Where's the chip man! Give it up sucka!"

You know it's true.

RE: Fatalities
By SandmanWN on 1/18/2008 3:29:01 PM , Rating: 5
One small tiny insignificant problem...

You just stole a wireless location device. ;)
T-minus how long before you are tracked down by the boys in blue?

RE: Fatalities
By GhandiInstinct on 1/18/2008 4:16:19 PM , Rating: 2
You've got at least a few days to do your buying before family members(if you have any) request a search on you. By the time FBI comes in and things start really kicking the device is in a ditch or disabled and the bad guys have a bunch of free stuff they just bought and you're dead.


RE: Fatalities
By SandmanWN on 1/18/2008 5:00:01 PM , Rating: 2
There are a number of unique structures in the body that could solve this problem.

You could code the RFID chip to only be active for a specific users DNA pattern. It would make the chip useless outside of its intended body.

In conjunction you could set it to a specific brainwave pattern. I was watching a show the other day where a paraplegic learned how to move a mouse on a computer with his thoughts. You could have the chip only be active if a certain brainwave pattern matched a set password.

So, the chip would have to be in the host body. The host would have to be alive for the brainwave to match. And the host would have to be cognitive in order to think of the correct password.

RE: Fatalities
By rfidguy on 1/19/2008 12:24:58 PM , Rating: 1
I seems science fiction, but ideas like this sometimes get steam behind it...

Two issue, the obvious is cutting into someone to get their RFID chip. If someone were able to do that, then the offender must have: an RFID reader to read the chip, software with the ability to decipher the bit array that is on the tag and then have some use for it.

It is easier today to steal someone's wallet and get the same information. An RFID chip may include items like allergies, medications, etc. Unless someone is really savvy, I'm not sure how far you get with that type of personal information.

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki