backtop


Print 53 comment(s) - last by noirsoft.. on Jan 15 at 12:22 PM


NEC CRVD-42DWX+ curved display  (Source: NEC)
NEC and Alienware seem to be pulling form the same playbook

At CES 2008 last week Alienware announced a curved computer display geared for gamers and making people more productive through more screen space while working on a computer.

NEC must feel that the market for long, curved displays is a up and coming category as it announced its own curved display called the NEC CRVD-42DWX+. The NEC display has a screen resolution of 2880 x 900 with a response time of under 0.02 milliseconds. The NTSC color gamut the display is capable of is 170% and the dynamic range is 12-bit. In all the display can reproduce 68.7 billion colors.

NEC spokeswomen emphasized that the Alienware prototype and the NEC CRVD-42DWX+ "have nothing to do with each other."

While NEC claims the two displays share no common manufacturer, both displays are built with the same bezel and housing. Both displays use two LED-backlit DLP images to "stitch" the 2880 pixel-wide image across the curved display as well.  The likelihood that these two displays are not made in the same place would be an unusually odd coincidence.

The display has a typical brightness of 350 nits with a contrast ratio greater than 10,000:1. The screen has an aspect ratio of 3.2:1 and weighs 25 pounds without a stand. The overall dimensions of the screen are 40.4-inches wide x 12.6-inches high.

NEC declined to comment on pricing or availability of the display at this time.  However, given the high-markup nature of Alienware proprietary technology, NEC could be sitting on a goldmine if it markets the CRVD-42DWX+ just right. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Comes down to Cost
By masher2 (blog) on 1/14/2008 2:19:31 PM , Rating: 2
> "It will be interesting to see how this monitor would handle multiple maximized windows."

I would hope that the software driver for the monitor would allow you choice-- maximize to the full screen, or to a half-sized "virtual" monitor.

However, the 900-pixel vertical resolution is the real killer for me. I don't see me trading in my two 24" monitors for this.


RE: Comes down to Cost
By LeviBeckerson (blog) on 1/14/2008 2:30:48 PM , Rating: 2
I can understand that. Once you are accustomed to a certain amount of space, it's hard to give it up. But I use a 17" 1280x1024 for my work space and a 20" 1680x1050 for my research slash what's-it-going-to-look-like-in-Firefox space, so 900 doesn't seem like it would be much of a drop for me.

Then again, my laptop is the standard 1280x800 and I can't imagine trying to do much work on it as it's so "short."

I also off-handedly wonder if it's going to be a single or dual connections to drive the screen. If it's a native dual-screen type connection, problems solved. It's the single input that'll cause problems, I'd think.


RE: Comes down to Cost
By jjabrams on 1/15/2008 7:20:20 AM , Rating: 2
is there any software that enhances what can be viewed on a webpage or other because not all pages/programs are designed with a high or wide resolution in mind - you just get white bars on the side.


“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki