backtop


Print 88 comment(s) - last by jconan.. on Jan 30 at 1:14 AM

Ford makes big promises for small engines

Auto manufacturers are furiously working up ways to increase the fuel economy of their vehicles without compromising the consumer's current expectations of large, powerful vehicles thanks to new CAFE regulations.

General Motors recently unveiled the 2009 Saturn Vue Green Line with an improved two-mode hybrid system, and still hopes to push out the highly anticipated Chevrolet Volt by 2010. Toyota is merrily improving their popular Prius, while Honda is promising both a hot-hatch revival with the CR-Z concept and the "family diesel" in the 2009 Accord. Ford, on the other hand, is taking an entirely different approach, trying to make the adage "More From Less" apply to high-powered SUVs and sedans.

At the 2008 Detroit Auto Show, Ford was showcased a new family of four and six-cylinder engines, dubbed "EcoBoost" to highlight their improved fuel economy. While the words "new engine technology" were thrown around fairly often to describe the EcoBoost line, the cornerstone technologies behind the engines -- direct injection and turbocharging -- should be immediately familiar to anyone who's followed automotive powertrain development in recent years. As the name suggests, Ford is trying to give small, high-boost engines a market beyond the current demographic of performance junkies -- but they need to get their foot in the door somehow.

The first vehicle to receive an “EcoBoosting” will be the upcoming 2009 Lincoln MKS. Shown in 2007 as the "MKR Concept," the MKS will feature a 3.5L twin-turbo V6 said to produce approximately 340 horsepower, and 340 lb-ft of torque between 2,000 and 5,000 RPM. Those hoping for a four-door, rear-drive performance sedan will be disappointed to discover the transverse mounting of the engine, and the associated choices of FWD or AWD; however, the possibility of such a vehicle hasn't been entirely ruled out.

Returning to the economical side of the impeller, Ford also featured a 2.0L turbo four, claiming an impressive 275hp and 280lb-ft. While such an engine would seem a perfect fit for a sport compact, Ford had bigger ambitions for the "little engine that could" -- announcing that it would be the base engine for the Ford Explorer America concept.

Ford's VP of product development, Derrick Kuzak, had high hopes for the technology, praising its low initial cost in comparison to other engine designs. "Compared with the current cost of diesel and hybrid technologies, customers in North America can expect to recoup their initial investment in a 4-cylinder EcoBoost engine through fuel savings in approximately 30 months." That's not to say that hybrids and diesels will be abandoned -- some light-duty Fords will be receiving these options as well.

Strangely, no mention of an EcoBoost engine was made for the Mustang -- perhaps Ford still has some of the hundreds of thousands of letters they received the last time they suggested a replacement.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: About time...
By FITCamaro on 1/7/2008 3:05:23 PM , Rating: 3
American car manufacturers had turbo engines in some of their models before many of the import manufacturers even existed.

And I know plenty of people with 20+ year old American cars on original powertrains. It all depends on how you take care of it. I can beat an import into the ground in a year. Just as I can care for an American car and have it last 300,000 miles.


RE: About time...
By Boushh on 1/7/2008 5:09:30 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
American car manufacturers had turbo engines in some of their models before many of the import manufacturers even existed.

Let's see: Wikipedia says:

quote:
The first production turbocharged automobile engines came from General Motors in 1962

Import Brands founded:

Mercdes Benz: 1926 (1886 for Daimler & Benz)
BMW: 1913
Toyota: 1933
Honda: 1938
Saab: 1937
Renault: 1898

Do I need to go on ?

Surprisingly the first Turbo engine form General Motors was a V8 (for somebody saying that fitting Turbo's on a V8 would be difficult)...


RE: About time...
By djc208 on 1/7/2008 5:59:46 PM , Rating: 2
Ah, but you think too small. Try this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesenberg which debuted a supercharged model J (or SJ) in 1928. A company far ahead of their time.


RE: About time...
By Spuke on 1/8/2008 9:33:30 AM , Rating: 2
Why did you get rated down? You posted facts that support that imports cars existed BEFORE American cars companies started using turbocharging. That's a fact.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki