backtop


Print 24 comment(s) - last by PandaBear.. on Jan 8 at 6:26 PM

Samsung doubles its SSD capacity

Two months ago, Samsung announced its new SATA II-based 64GB solid-state disk (SSD). The 64GB SSD promised read speeds of 120MB/sec and write speeds of 100MB/sec.

Today, Samsung is doubling the capacity of its latest SATA II SSD offering to 128GB. Instead of relying on single-level cell (SLC) NAND flash memory, the new 128GB offering makes use of multi-level cell (MLC) NAND flash.

Unfortunately, performance dropped with the new 128 SSD -- read speeds are down to 100MB/sec while write speeds hover at 70MB/sec.

“Our SSD can be used by the widest range of corporate notebooks, particularly where additional storage is needed beyond what is typical in most business applications,” said Jim Elliott, director of flash memory marketing for Samsung Semiconductor.

Samsung's new 128GB SSD pales in comparison to BiTMICRO's massive 832GB SSD which was recently announced. Samsung, however, has the advantage when it comes to availability and pricing. Samsung's 128GB SSD will be available in the first half of 2008 with pricing of at least a couple thousand dollars.

BiTMICRO's 832GB SSD, on the other hand, won't be mass produced until the latter half of 2008 and will likes cost tens of thousands of dollars.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Performance not capacity
By Ringold on 1/6/2008 8:09:04 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, if I take my Program Files (x86) folder and strip out the games, it includes ESET, a couple anti-spyware apps, MS Office 2007, a few DVD-related apps, K-Lite Codec pack .. several other goodies, and it's under 2GB.

Of course, it's 28GB if I include installed games, but I think the OP was speaking along the lines of a mobile laptop. Plus, I only play about 5gb worth of those anyway.. Got enough HD space I dont worry about removing them.

Another 400mb+ hanging out in Program Files.

No idea if I could go in an do liposuction on C:\Windows, but it eats 15.3gb. Windows + P.F. = 17.3gb on what I'd consider a fully-capable Windows environment; multiple web browsers, can view almost any media file under the sun, rip DVDs, secured with AV and firewall, full Office capability..

Add 5gb for games, and then round up to 32gb because it's a geek-approved number, and you've got a complete rig for most people that can game and still do a little of everything most people use a computer for, but would still need seperate external storage to do more then 1 or 2 large tasks at a time. For a laptop, that'd be peachy.


RE: Performance not capacity
By JoshuaBuss on 1/7/08, Rating: -1
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Related Articles
BiTMICRO Pumps SSD Capacities to 832GB
January 4, 2008, 1:55 PM
Samsung Launches Speedy SATA II SSDs
November 5, 2007, 11:29 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki