backtop


Print 133 comment(s) - last by Kyanzes.. on Dec 27 at 2:40 PM

Chinese mainlanders will have to turn to piracy to watch the latest American blockbusters

China is blocking the import of American films, said MPAA CEO and Chairman Dan Glickman in an official statement released last week.

“Although we have not received official confirmation of such a ban from the Chinese Government or China Film, the indicators are strong that our information is correct,” read the statement. “If such action has been taken … it would represent an enormous step backwards in terms of China’s efforts to develop a strong … and legitimate film exhibition and distribution market.”

In a move that some suspect is retaliation for a recent U.S.-filed WTO complaint over China’s alarmingly high piracy rate, the Chinese government appears to have stopped granting import requests to American filmmakers -- of which it normally allows for about 20 movies per year. According to one anonymous Hollywood executive speaking to The New York Times, the Chinese government became suddenly uncooperative; filmmakers’ movie import requests for early next year have thus far been ignored, delayed, or come back denied.

“We are working with top officials in the US government, including the Treasury Secretary, as well as the Trade Representative and Secretary of Commerce, both of whom are in China at the moment,” said Glickman. “If these reports are true, it is unacceptable that China has taken this action and we will bring all our resources and leverage to bear to address this situation.”

A spokeswoman from the Chinese State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television, declined to comment on the so-called ban, noting that if such a ban was in place it would have been officially announced on the Administration’s web site.

American filmmakers, many of whom are betting heavily on the growing the Chinese market, say China’s restrictive stance on American movies is a direct contributor to the country’s high piracy rate. The previous 20-movie limit is “a very low number to begin with,” said U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab, “and we believe the low number contributes to the problems [we] have in intellectual property rights protection.”

A Chinese ban on American movies “would be very serious indeed,” said Schwab, who at the time was at a Strategic Economic Dialogue meeting outside Beijing. “We have spoken forcefully to our Chinese hosts.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By bigpow on 12/19/2007 5:27:46 PM , Rating: 5
Text above says it all.

We're NOT that all-mighty anymore today.
At the end of the day, they have large enough market to be self-sufficient, while we don't. Plus, they own a lot of US soils (read: mortgage), businesses, etc.

We all know, even when they were importing Movies and Music officially, there were a lot of piracy going on.

I think we pissed them off by impossing more tarrif (textile, etc) and this is how they try to show us that they can hurt us back. Simple as that.

Try to bully them, and they'll bite our fat asses even more.

I believe The key is through diplomatic negotiations. Once we present ourselves properly and politely (on the same level, not like before), they wouldn't have any reason to act Hostile. They will have to comply in return (even if they're only pretending).

I would hate to be the one who has to play this game of Chess.




By 195 on 12/19/2007 5:39:50 PM , Rating: 3
sorry man China isn't self sufficient. China rely's on the US for the majority of their income. And we rely on China for the majority of our goods. It's like each country is on each end of a chinese finger trap (no pun intended).

As much as I would like to see the MPAA and RIAA get pwned, China is much more shady in their business practices than the MPAA. I would like to see China get pwned with restrictions on China's exports worldwide until they stop pegging currency, ripping off innovative pantented products, and bootlegging. The entire reason for their substantial growth stems from their cheating. Their growth should have been much slower if they had an open market.


By Strunf on 12/20/2007 5:07:33 AM , Rating: 2
"I would like to see China get pwned with restrictions on China's exports worldwide"

The WTO has no enforcement power whatsoever... the US got pawned by the WTO more than once and nothing was/is done in US to comply with the WTO.


By FITCamaro on 12/19/2007 5:47:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I believe The key is through diplomatic negotiations. Once we present ourselves properly and politely (on the same level, not like before), they wouldn't have any reason to act Hostile. They will have to comply in return (even if they're only pretending).


Yeah that's worked really well.......never.


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 12/19/2007 6:28:35 PM , Rating: 4
It worked pretty well for Nixon. It's regarded as one of the few things he got right actually.


By Sahrin on 12/19/2007 7:33:16 PM , Rating: 2
It worked pretty well for Nixon. It's regarded as one of the few things he got right actually.

Only by the incomparably ignorant. Nixon was one of the finest Presidents of this century in every sense of the word - the difference between Nixon and everyone else is that Nixon got caught, and publicly admitted his mistake. No other president to my knowledge has done so. (Consider his predecessors, Johnson and Kennedy who are considered moderate to great - Kennedy almost certainly was elected by massive fraud the ilk of which Nixon admitted to, and Johnson was guilty of fraud of another kind from the start).

Paranoid to the level of psychologically imbalanced? Probably. Mishandled most domestic issues? Clearly. The President who more than any other in the last fifty years solidifed American Hegemony? Without doubt.

People (especially those in the media) are so oft to decry him for reasons that escape me - the crimes of which he was guilty are very similar to those being committed by Bush, and Clinton; Reagan and Bush; Carter and Kennedy. The difference, of course, is that none of them tried to take the dastardly step of taking responsibility for the mistakes of his administration.

Decry Nixon for his crimes if you wish, but at least grant that he was one of the finest Diplomats America has had sitting in the Round Room.


"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki