Print 28 comment(s) - last by littlebitstrou.. on Dec 19 at 10:27 AM

Whoops! They did it again -- Britain's government looses millions of more people's personal records.

The UK government is making a run at the record books, but not a very positive one.  Britain's government, plagued by bureaucratic fumblings, is setting new records in how many citizens' personal data one country can manage to lose.  Last month there was news of a record setting loss of 25 million citizen's records, which were sent in the mail by CD and mysteriously vanished.  "Catch Me If You Can" criminal legend Frank Abagnale publicly suggested that someone had purposefully plotted to steal the data, which included bank records, and succeeded -- due to Britain's lax security.

Now the UK officials are twiddling their thumbs and awkwardly trying to put a positive spin on the latest shocking development; they have managed to lose another 3 million citizens' data.

Britain's bureaucratic system electronically stores records for learner drivers, including information on their vehicle, name, address, and other personal information.  Much of this information was privately contracted for storage to a facility in Iowa, in the United States.  This facility revealed to government officials in May that it had lost a single hard disk, which contained over 3 million records.  The UK's Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly, in turn, sat on this information and did not reveal it to Britain's Parliament until this week.

She issued a short public apology, referencing fears of possible identity theft that the victims of this latest bumble may endure, saying, "I apologize for any uncertainty or concern that these individuals may experience."

Fortunately no banking or credit card info is included in the records, however, a malicious party could use the information to apply for credit cards and commit identity theft on a massive scale.

The loss is seen in Britain as another major embarrassment to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, and the Labor Party (LP), who are struggling with public antipathy.  The Conservative party is seizing the issue as a further means to attack the struggling LP and build a lead into coming elections.

Security remains an increasingly hot topic, as everyone from nuclear plant officials to everyday citizens continue to show a lack of savvy for protecting themselves online.  Between lax data and network management procedures at government and business facilities, to users giving up personal information for an abstract sense of "trust", the greatest threat to public and government security is not some malicious hacker, but the users and officials themselves. 

Britain is seeing the catastrophic consequences of this ignorance, but it is unlikely to be alone as users struggle to separate real threats from fiction and safeguard themselves in the 21st century digital world.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Something New
By Mitch101 on 12/18/2007 11:08:45 AM , Rating: 2
Anyone else feel that certain items like social security numbers, drivers licence, etc should move toward something new. Or some sort of monitoring system that tells you when your personal data is being queried or used like the credit system. Maybe add a PIN to social security or a keyword. Maybe all of the above?

I'm not sure what the solution is but its obvious that the designs are severely flawed.

In some respects I think credit card companies want fraud as for the last 10 years I wanted the ability to say I will never purchase anything more than $200.00 on this credit card unless I log into the credit card account and pre-submit I am going to make a large purchase.

RE: Something New
By Grast on 12/18/2007 11:17:03 AM , Rating: 2
I agree this type of information need to be handled in a more secure manor. I believe all personal data should be handled the same way all other clasified information is handled in the military and security agencies.

If a database does exist, security has to be based on a need to know. A department must exist which is their sole job to determine if someone really needs to know. Additionally, all access to this databased should be strictly controlled via similar processes.

I once followed the package carrier across 8 states due to the carrier shipping a production server full of customer data from one datacenter to another. The amount and type of data was considered so important. That once it left the protection of the datacenter. A employee had to keep it in sight or under lock and key until delifered to its final destination.

Losing data in the mail is stupid. The entire IT department for the British government should be layed off and told to find new professions. They obviously do not value their jobs.


RE: Something New
By Misty Dingos on 12/18/2007 11:50:15 AM , Rating: 2
Good luck with reforming the way any government handles the personal data of tax paying citizens!

I don't care who you vote for on this one. The bureaucracy will not change no matter who is in office. You want to strangle change? Get ten thousand bureaucrats to dig in their heels and slow up work. Granted as slow as most governmental agencies are that slow down might be hard to notice.

Getting the bureaucracy to responsibly handle your ID info will be harder than getting the government to set up privatized retirement plans or an honest and fair income tax system or a health care plan that actually works to the benefit of the citizen and not the government or an insurance company.

The only way to ensure that your personal data is always yours is to never let the government have it at all. No I am not saying to live in a cave in the woods. But that you have your data with you continuously. The only time the government looks at your data is when interface with the government in some way. There would of course have to be exceptions to this, namely criminals. They would have to be tracked in some way by the government.

Oh I don’t know if this idea would work at all but it does put the person in charge of their own life again.

RE: Something New
By theapparition on 12/18/2007 12:23:40 PM , Rating: 2
The only way to ensure that your personal data is always yours is to never let the government have it at all.

That's not going to happen. The biggest piece of personal information is you SSN, which is government provided. The SSN also became your financial record, for credit bureaus. Identity theft, which is why most people are worried about information leaks like this, can mostly be avoided by contacting the credit bureaus and asking them not to use your SSN, rather use another credit identifier. This way, any leaks on your SSN cannot be used for fraudulent credit purposes.

RE: Something New
By Christopher1 on 12/18/2007 12:54:31 PM , Rating: 2
We shouldn't have to ASK them to use something different as a credit identifier. They should also have on record the names and ages of people, the credit bureaus, so if they see someone who is less than 16 getting a credit card, they can say "Wait a minute? Something stinks here! Maybe we should contact this person!"

We should move to social security cards ONLY being used for social security, and set up ANOTHER card system for credit reports and other things.

Maybe the new card could have your name, age and address printed on it, as well as a CURRENT PHOTOGRAPH! That is what I really would like to see on SS cards in the near future: current photographs so that NO ONE can impersonate another person and a card that easily tells if it has been tampered with.

RE: Something New
By TomZ on 12/18/2007 1:02:11 PM , Rating: 2
We should move to social security cards ONLY being used for social security, and set up ANOTHER card system for credit reports and other things.

That doesn't solve the problem; it only changes the problem.
Maybe the new card could have your name, age and address printed on it, as well as a CURRENT PHOTOGRAPH!

Seems like you're advocating a new national ID card. There are a lot of folks that believe that the US government doesn't have the right/mandate to do that. I'm not advocating either side of that debate; I'm just saying that a debate exists.

RE: Something New
By bodar on 12/18/2007 2:19:14 PM , Rating: 2
Hawaii allows people to put an indefinite freeze on new credit lines, so you can drop it only when you want to buy a car or apply for a new card. After that, shields up. The only real downer is that I think it takes a few days to take effect

RE: Something New
By bodar on 12/18/2007 2:22:35 PM , Rating: 2
Also it costs $15 ($5 per credit agency) every time you do it, unless you're the victim of ID theft. Then it's free.

RE: Something New
By FITCamaro on 12/18/2007 1:57:50 PM , Rating: 1
This is why I am for a national ID system here in the US. Keep everything in one place instead of having duplicate records from state to state.

RE: Something New
By TomZ on 12/18/2007 3:11:35 PM , Rating: 2
The Federal Government would like that too, since it would make it much easier to compile more detailed records about all of us - where we live, where we work, where we go, who we see, what web sites we visit, etc.

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki