backtop


Print 71 comment(s) - last by NesteaZen.. on Dec 31 at 5:19 AM


Mario, Master Chief and Kratos in Greenpeace's "Clash of the Consoles"  (Source: Greenpeace.org)
Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony tagged as toxic console makers by Greenpeace

Earlier this week Greenpeace posted a trailer depicting Nintendo’s Mario holding a Wii, Microsoft’s Master Chief holding a RROD’ed Xbox 360 and SCEA’s Kratos hit by a PlayStation 3.

No, it’s not the world’s greatest console gaming crossover – it’s Greenpeace’s jab at the three console giants for their apparent environment negligence.

“The games consoles market is one of the fastest growing in consumer electronics with over 60 million sold and 14 percent growth last year,” Greenpeace explained on its newly launched Clash of the Consoles website. “These consoles contain toxic chemicals and can contribute to the massive growth of electronic waste that's often dumped, causing widespread environmental pollution and health problems for unprotected workers.”

Greenpeace has been pushing for the entire electronics manufacturing industry to replace the use of toxic chemicals such as brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) with safer alternatives, the environmental group believes that none of the consoles produced by the big three are toxic-responsible.

“We've checked how the environmental performances of Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo measure up on toxics, recycling and energy use,” said Greenpeace. “None of these three seems even close to making a greener console.”

Sony has a policy for eliminating the worst toxic chemicals from its products by 2010, but the policy does not cover PlayStation products, according to Greenpeace. Sony won marks for having the best take and recycling programmes, but was criticized for make the most power-hungry gaming console (128 watts).

In August, Sony announced the Sony Take Back Recycling Program, allowing consumers to recycle all Sony-branded products – including PlayStations – for no fee at 75 Waste Management Recycle America eCycling drop-off centers throughout the U.S.

On the other hand, Microsoft has a policy to eliminate toxicity by 2011 but does not have the voluntary take back program. The Xbox 360 Elite was also hit for consuming more power (97 watts) than the Wii.

The Wii pleased Greenpeace for its exceptionally low power consumption (15 watts), at levels at least six times below the other systems, but Nintendo was condemned as the worst offender on the scale of toxic use, policy and recycling credits.

Greenpeace slammed Nintendo in November following a report on “greener” electronics. Nintendo was placed dead last in a list of 18 companies due to the console maker’s lack of public disclosure on its chemical and recycling policies.

Nintendo expressed surprise at the content of the Greenpeace report, releasing a statement saying, “Nintendo takes great care to comply with all relevant regulations on avoiding the use of dangerous materials, recycling of materials etc. For example, all Nintendo products supplied worldwide are designed to comply with relevant global standards.”

The company continued, “In order to certify that Nintendo products comply with standards for hazardous chemical substances, Nintendo has established the Green Procurement Standards, which require our component suppliers certify that any parts including hazardous chemical substances should not be delivered, and Nintendo fully controls its products in the company.”

Microsoft and Sony have yet to respond to Greenpeace’s claims.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hypocrites
By Ringold on 12/13/2007 5:31:46 AM , Rating: 2
I already posted this link, but:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/nuclear

"NO NEW NUKES"

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/fearing-us-reac...

"END WHALING"

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/genetic-en...

"Join us in saying no to genetic engineering."

Sounds like they're an all or nothing group to me! ;)


RE: Hypocrites
By derdon on 12/14/2007 3:25:16 AM , Rating: 2
They make compromises when the situation doesn't allow for more.
GMO might be a technology for the future, but there's a lot of bad things happening with it. It's not properly tested and given to the people in a way that people can't even tell if what they buy contains GMO or not. Customers don't have the freedom to decide, they're forced to eat what's handed to them and obviously some don't like that. A big part of the GMO campaign has been to make companies label the products that are produced with GMO sources. I think the customers deserve to know what's inside of what they buy.

Whaling is obvious that it needs to be stopped until the populations have strengthened again. Sustainable developement is a big part of what Greenpeace is trying to achieve, something that a lot of greedy companies have no idea of. Take the collapse of the cod fish industry in 1992. They would fish as long as no fish is there anymore and then abandon the whole thing leaving a deserted place. That's the result of uncontrolled and unregulated human action! This particular example has led me to the conclusion that if we don't care in the end we'll destroy ourselves. You'd believe fisheries would not fish beyond what's sustainable so that they're able to stay alive, right?
This doesn't mean we must stop fishery altogether, but that we must make it sustainable.

Is that all or nothing to you or is it just reasonable?


"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki