Source: The Verge
quote: If Samsung should be sued, it's for being lazy
quote: C'mon Droidtards, tell me this pictures don't look alike:
quote: And coding iOS sure as shit didn't cost "billions".
quote: It's Samsung's technology that represents billions in R&D, without which the iPhone could not exist.
quote: Sure they look alike, because it's Photoshopped you idiot!
quote: The iPhone innovated, Google and Samsung just copied, with their half-@ssed crapdroids that are always crashing and dying and can't go four hours practically without running out of battery.
quote: LMAO Apple didn't "develop" ANY technology for the iPhone. And coding iOS sure as shit didn't cost "billions".
quote: Yea for being lazy and ripping off the iPhone and its technology that took billions to develop.
quote: I haven't seen an Android that wasn't a wannabe iPhone. Google and co. wouldn't no innovation if it smacked them in the faces.
quote: I don't get it. if you all want an iPhone so badly, why don't you just buy one?Hopefully all the crapdroids get sued off the market and that solves that problem for you. Then you can finally get that iPhone you've been secretly wanting all along.
quote: White ear buds, really?
quote: Its a shame that less "vapid" companies like HTC are suffering by doing their own designs.
quote: Trade dress is the issue.
quote: Samsung appears to have copied the iPhone from the chassis and UI right down to the packaging and accessories. This is why Apple appears to have a case against them.
quote: No one can look at Samsung's mobile products over the last decade and not consider them anything other than a ruthless, relentless copy of everything popular that's came before. It's not that Samsung doesn't continuously push the limits of hardware specifications and capabilities as much if not more than anyone else. They do. But they do so by systematically, institutionally copying what other vendors have already done first.Samsung does it to such a degree, and with such a consistency, that it's flabbergasting they can show up in court, swear an oath, and claim anything otherwise. Now they could claim it doesn't matter, that all phones and tablets and icons should look alike, and would be understandable as a strategy. But claiming they don't copy? Absurd.
quote: How about a nice tall glass of STFU with your -1 rating?
quote: Sprockkets - it's no good venting your anger at me like this in public
quote: what I told privately I'm sticking too - you cannot come and live with me and be my sex slave. And that's definite :)
quote: The idea that you can "patent" a vague design and claim it as your own, is something that doesn't jive with rational unbiased people.
quote: There is a significant difference between using the Mac and Smalltalk.Smalltalk has no Finder, and no need for one, really. Drag-and-drop file manipulation came from the Mac group, along with many other unique concepts: resources and dual-fork files for storing layout and international information apart from code; definition procedures; drag-and-drop system extension and configuration; types and creators for files; direct manipulation editing of document, disk, and application names; redundant typed data for the clipboard; multiple views of the file system; desk accessories; and control panels, among others. The Lisa group invented some fundamental concepts as well: pull down menus, the imaging and windowing models based on QuickDraw, the clipboard, and cleanly internationalizable software.Smalltalk had a three-button mouse and pop-up menus, in contrast to the Mac's menu bar and one-button mouse. Smalltalk didn't even have self-repairing windows - you had to click in them to get them to repaint, and programs couldn't draw into partially obscured windows. Bill Atkinson did not know this, so he invented regions as the basis of QuickDraw and the Window Manager so that he could quickly draw in covered windows and repaint portions of windows brought to the front. One Macintosh feature identical to a Smalltalk feature is selection-based modeless text editing with cut and paste, which was created by Larry Tesler for his Gypsy editor at PARC.As you may be gathering, the difference between the Xerox system architectures and Macintosh architecture is huge; much bigger than the difference between the Mac and Windows. It's not surprising, since Microsoft saw quite a bit of the Macintosh design (API's,sample code, etc.) during the Mac's development from 1981 to 1984; the intention was to help them write applications for the Mac, and it also gave their system designers a template from which to design Windows. In contrast, the Mac and Lisa designers had to invent their own architectures. Of course, there were some ex- Xerox people in the Lisa and Mac groups, but the design point for these machines was so different that we didn't leverage our knowledge of the Xerox systems as much as some people think.
quote: Do you think that Apple copied Xerox or not?
quote: Do you think that Apple has a history of copying other companies' products or not?
quote: "We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas."Steve Jobs, 'Triumph of the Nerds', PBS, 1996.
quote: Do you think Samsung copied Apple or not?
quote: Do you think Samsung has a history of copying other companies products or not.