backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 20 comment(s) - last by Slaimus.. on Jul 28 at 10:34 AM

Wild-card vote will likely allow satellite deal to go through

The FCC is set to approve a proposed merger between XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio shortly, with the final tie-breaking vote to be cast in the merger’s favor.

That final vote belongs to Republican FCC Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate, who according to reports waited for a variety of “outstanding enforcement issues” to be resolved before announcing support. Most of her qualms revolved around outstanding enforcement issues – in one case, the FCC previously found land-based radio repeaters transmitting signals beyond FCC limits. Attempts to resolve the issue, in some cases, created cross-talk with traditional terrestrial radio. A joint agreement will see the two companies settling with the FCC for just under $20 million, with XM paying the lion’s share of fines – about $17.5 million – while Sirius chips in a more modest $2 million.

Tate’s vote broke a 2-2 deadlock among the FCC’s top brass, with votes splitting down party lines.

In casting his vote against the merger Wednesday, Democratic Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein called the merger a “monopoly with window dressing.”

The FCC “missed a great opportunity to reach a bipartisan agreement that would have benefited the American people,” he said.

The Wall Street Journal reports that both companies combined are worth about $7.5 billion.

Under the proposed terms, both XM and Sirius will agree to a variety of terms designed to quell fears of a monopoly. Both companies will commit to a three-year price freeze for existing customers, as well as interoperability initiatives that will give third parties the documentation needed to build compatible satellite radios.

More notably, both companies agreed last June to set aside a portion of their programming capacity – about 8%, or 24 channels – for use by educational and minority broadcasters. A Wall Street Journal dossier on Commissioner Tate implies that this deal is likely her doing.

The merger is timed to allow the combined companies to make a big marketing push in time for the 2008 holiday shopping season. Consumers will be able to mix and match service between both companies’ selections within three months, and they will have a number of new à la carte stations to choose from as well.

With the stances of everyone in the FCC’s commission settled, an actual vote is expected cast by the FCC’s August 1 meeting.

Review over a proposed merger has been in the works for the past 13 months, with analysts initially catching wind of an agreement in January 2007. At that time, it was widely expected that the FCC would turn down such a deal, due to concerns that the two companies –the only real players in the American satellite radio market – would merge to form a monopoly.

Time has been kind to the prospect, however, and in March the U.S. Department of Justice gave the deal its blessings. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin announced his support in June.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I have sirius and the quality is terrible.
By Chudilo on 7/24/2008 9:45:16 AM , Rating: 3
Sirius's audio quality is terrible.
Most music stations sound like a bad quality MP3.
They use a low sampling rate on many music channels, many sound worse then FM radio.
I called them to confront them and sent a few messages to tech support. They gave some BS excuses that the content providers (DJ) are to blame for the bad quality. Yeah right, like any audio professional would personally down-sample their content.
They are ruining the technology they are trying to sell.
I wanted to cancel as well but they gave the 3 months for the price of 1 too. so I'll stay on for another quarter. once that's over I'm out as well.




RE: I have sirius and the quality is terrible.
By ksherman on 7/24/2008 10:02:29 AM , Rating: 2
I had XM for a month when I had a rental, and noticed the same things. It drove me nuts! MOstly people probably don't notice, but that extra high pitch is what gets me. I think Pandora on my iPhone sounded better.


By callmeroy on 7/24/2008 11:52:16 AM , Rating: 1
I agree , I also have Sirius though I never paid them a dime directly for it yet, and the quality is crap.

I got Sirius originally because it came with my new car lease -- the 1 year free deal...well my year was up 3 months ago in April and low and behold I still get every channel of sirius. Sirius even sent a total of about 4 letters and called me 3 times to "warn" me of impending cancellation from Mid March to the mid of April...each time I shot them down and finally I called them and said "Enough"...I bitched them out for so much hassling and told them turn it off right now but stop bothering me! But I still get Sirius so I don't know what the deal is. I don't really care either.

Anyway - I wouldn't pay for it now that I had it...three main things bug me with the service:

1) Even when I drive on open highways it seems to lose signal quite a bit, and on my route home forget it -- there's a little bit of tree coverage on the roads I ride and its just constantly trying to re-connect to the signal. Pathetic.

2) As everyone mentioned - the sound quality is just lame. I actually couldn't stand it after a while so I stopped listening to the music channels and just listened to the stand up comedy channels - which to me is the best thing about Sirius, as I enjoy comedy a lot.

3) Commercials. Yes don't be fooled by the "no commercials" its bullshit, there are commecials, just much more selective commercials than on public radio.

All that combined and I'm thinking "AND people PAY for this?" ...and that's what I told the Sirius rep during my final phone call with them.


By PointlesS on 7/24/2008 10:14:07 AM , Rating: 2
this is the only reason why I don't have it...radio in a lot of places is a nightmare for me...I listen to a ton of metal which understandably isn't played at all on radio...I love sirius' hard attack but the quality is so terrible it just sounds like a blurred mess

I like the commercials that say "radio you shouldn't have to pay for it"...well offer me something good then!

and on an unrelated note I hate when a station advertises "no commercials" but then the dj is taking for 5 minutes about some product or has a "phone interview" with some company about some sale they're having


By AlexWade on 7/24/2008 10:25:05 AM , Rating: 2
I have XM and the audio quality is audibly better than Sirius, but Sirius has better stations. With the right equipment, XM can sound good. But you need a head unit with support instead of going through the radio.

Sirius uses 3 satellites, two of which are always visible to the US. XM uses 4 geosynchronous satellites. I believe that is why XM sounds better than Sirius. I want Sirius programming with XM quality.


By therealnickdanger on 7/24/2008 10:32:31 AM , Rating: 2
I usually listen to Hard Attack, Lithium, Chill, and Boombox... actually that's all I listen to. The quality doesn't match my fine collection of 320K MP3s, but I don't expect it to. I listen to it mostly to find new artists that I would otherwise never hear of.

For example, check out Cates & DPL "Everfighters". It's a remix of Foo Fighters "Everlong". It's pretty damned amazing. I heard it on Sirius Chill one day, so I looked up Cates and DPL and found their myspace site. I sent them a message telling them how much I like their remix and they responded by e-mailing me the extended 320K MP3 of it for free!

I had a similar experience with the artist Banzai Republic. He had done a remix of a Cantoma song (another great artist I heard on Sirius). I found his myspace and he sent me not only the song I heard, but master WAV recordings of EVERY remix or original piece he had ever done! He nearly filled a dual-layer DVD and mailed it from Amsterdam to me at no cost.

There are so many great artists I have been exposed to due to Sirius. Of course, the same could be said about Radioio, DigitallyImported, etc. And I can stream those over my phone (Sprint Touch) directly to the audio inputs of my car.

Between Sirius, web-radio, and my own collection of MP3s, I honestly am in music heaven - even if it's not all the best quality.


By Some1ne on 7/24/2008 6:58:00 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, come on now. What do you expect, CD quality audio over a satellite radio? That's just not going to happen. For all their technological innovations, both XM and Sirius only have a fairly limited amount of bandwidth per channel (think roughly the amount of bandwidth necessary to stream a 128 kbps MP3 file, at best). They *have* to compress the audio in order to broadcast it (either that, or they have to reduce the number of channels they carry by about a factor of 10), so it's completely unreasonable to expect to get any sort of high fidelity sound out of a satellite radio. If that's what you want, get an in-car CD player or an ipod dock or something (or better yet, build a custom multimedia PC into your car and load it full of FLAC files).

Satellite radio doesn't exist for the purpose of providing people high quality audio. It exists more so that people can travel long distances without having to constantly change radio stations, and so that they can have more options above and beyond whatever their local stations happen to be. If you got your satellite radio setup expecting it to provide high fidelity audio, then I'm sorry but the technology just isn't there yet, and you got it for the wrong reason.


Cant stand XM
By mdogs444 on 7/24/2008 9:14:28 AM , Rating: 2
So about 10 months ago, I purchased a new Honda Accord that had an XM tuner built in, and came with 3 months service free. XM contacted me about 6 weeks later to get me to extend my service contract past the 3 months for a special at $14.99 total for 3 additional months. I gladly obliged and gave them my credit card number to bill me on.

About 2 months later, I recieved a bill for $17.xx ($14.99 service, $2.00 invoice charge, $.xx taxes). So I called them to ask several questions:

1. I already gave you my credit card number, why didnt you charge me?
2. What is a $2.00 invoice fee?? You mean I'm paying you for the service, and on top of that, I'm paying you to send me a bill for that service?? Since when are total operating expenses NOT included in service fees?

After a bunch of lame excuses, they tried to tell me that they could charge my credit card monthly automatically, not getting a $2.00 quarterly invoice fee charge, but I'd have to pay about $20 to enroll in it. Else, Id have to pay $2.00/quarter ($8.00/year) to get billed. I also explained to them that the service was not worth $15.00/mo after the promotion, so I'd like to cancel. Basically they worked out a deal for an additional several months of service at the $4.99/mo charge (expires Aug 26th). I told them thats fine, but do NOT expect me to pay any $2.00 invoice fees (I didnt pay the first time either). So what do I just get? Another bill with invoice fees.

I hate these shady practices of "and other fees". Not to mention that there are more and more commercials on XM radio now than ever before. One of the big things I originally liked was there were no (or little to no) commercials at all.

I will gladly cancel my subscription in August, and start using the AUX jack again in my Honda to plug in my mp3 player.




RE: Cant stand XM
By ksherman on 7/24/2008 9:23:20 AM , Rating: 2
Only time I listen to radio is for traffic, Cubs games or [conservative] talk radio... all on AM. Otherwise, its an MP3 CD or my aged iPod


RE: Cant stand XM
By MrBlastman on 7/24/2008 9:59:09 AM , Rating: 5
Don't forget college radio. I might be in my 30's but college radio (at least in my city) has quite a bit to offer in terms of refreshing, non-mainstream talent and none of that clearchannel regurgitated crud.

Yeah, you'll get some weird stuff(but that is half the fun), but you'll also get some very creative artists on the air that you never would have heard otherwise.


RE: Cant stand XM
By Goatjoe on 7/24/2008 1:30:30 PM , Rating: 2
I have XM also, and I have not had any signal issues, or sound issues that some of you have had. I guess I may not be too picky, since I live in BF-Nowhere (Burke, SD - google it!) and the only thing that we can get on the regular radio is cattle market reports, good ol' church stations, and the one classic "we're hip n' cool" station that plays everything from the 70's on up.. Really, I would go insane with out XM... For my $12 or so bucks a month, its worth it... Hopefully this merger will give us an opportunity to customize a list of stations we can subscribe to...


Merger may be nessasary
By lifeblood on 7/24/2008 8:57:31 AM , Rating: 3
Satellite radio is still too new and very expensive to build and operate and the market may not be big enough to support two competing services. Having a monopoly early on when it's in it's infancy may not be a bad thing. Certainly better then having both companies fold. That would not serve the consumer.




RE: Merger may be nessasary
By coacharnold on 7/24/2008 10:20:58 AM , Rating: 2
um .., The technology is already built ... so therefore not expensive or new by any means .... and i don't know if you've looked around but these radios are everywhere. Check out the dashboard of cars as you drive down the road. True ... the sound quality sux. But for other kinds of programming (i.e. Howard Stern, Baseball ... ect ) Sirrus/xm can't be beat.


RE: Merger may be nessasary
By AntiM on 7/24/2008 10:45:51 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, I was hoping it would be approved. Terrestrial radio definitely needs some competition; it is all but totally useless in my area. I find my self turning off the radio rather than listening to the dribble they're trying to pass through the airwaves. However, as others have mentioned, the first thing the Sirius/XM company needs to do is drastically improve their sound quality. From what I've heard, Sirius sounds like a poorly encoded 64kbs mp3. That's not going to cut it when you're competing with the ipod and other media players.
That kind of competition will also keep their prices in check.


Finally
By SuperFly03 on 7/24/2008 8:49:33 AM , Rating: 2
Finally, took the FCC long enough.




RE: Finally
By Regs on 7/24/2008 11:23:38 AM , Rating: 2
Negotiating terms more or less as the article states.


By hellokeith on 7/24/2008 6:22:25 PM , Rating: 2
Number of stations: excellent
Variety of genre's: very good
Content within a particular genre: fair
Signal quality: mediocre

I kept it on the commercial-free trance station pretty much the whole time. Very cool, albeit the limitations mentioned above about content and signal quality.




SIRIUS subscriber here...
By jamesbond007 on 7/25/2008 8:40:19 PM , Rating: 2
And I couldn't be happier! I don't have a whole lot of stations to choose from as I live in the midwest. [Hello Burke, SD from Fargo, ND. =) ]

Sure, the SQ isn't as great as it maybe could be or as others would like, but it sure beats the living pants off of fiddling with an iPod in the car or swapping burned CDs full of MP3s. As others have put it, traditional radio just doesn't provide the vast genres us Internet Radio streamers have become use to. Also, I cannot and will not stand the plethora of commercials. Sure, SIRIUS is not totally free of commercials on all stations, but I listen to Octane #20, which is my favorite, 24 and 28 as well. I can't say that I've actually heard any kind of real commericals on those stations. Sometimes the DJs come on-air and blab for 20 or so seconds, but then it's back to the music. If you want to talk about a bad station in terms of commercials and no-play time, it's Shade 45 (#45).

Perhaps the merger will allow the conglomerate to provide what we all seem to want: higher SQ, more selection, and better availability.

I've been a subscriber for almost 2 years and am having high hopes to what the future may bring.




By XM User on 7/26/2008 9:51:30 AM , Rating: 2
XM resolution is unlistenable for many music categories, including classical, jazz and acoustic folk. Pop and rock, which are usually severely compressed for radio anyway, are nearly as bad. I agree with the poster who thought the sound was equivalent to a 64Kbps MP3 file. I think subscribers should have a choice between limited programming at very high quality, or the current hundreds of channels at poor quality. I'd take high resolution every time.