backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 98 comment(s) - last by Jedi2155.. on May 5 at 5:41 AM

SP3 is finally available for download.

Last week, DailyTech reported that Service Pack 3 (SP3) for Windows XP was released to manufacturing (RTM). At the time, Microsoft's Chris Keroack noted that consumers should expect to get their hands on the update April 29.

“We are also in the final stages of preparing for release to the web (i.e. you!) on April 29th, via Windows Update and the Microsoft Download Center,” said Keroack last Monday. “Online documentation for Windows XP SP3, such as Microsoft Knowledge Base articles and the Microsoft TechNet Windows XP TechCenter, will be updated then. For customers who use Windows XP at home, Windows XP SP3 Automatic Update distribution for users at home will begin in early summer.”

It appears that the time has come and everyone can now download SP3. A link to the 316MB service pack was posted on BetaNews yesterday afternoon. Although Microsoft isn't yet hosting a download page for SP3, the download links directly back to Windows Update.

For those that haven't been keeping up with the latest SP3 updates, the service pack includes roughly 1,100 hotfixes/patches and new features like Network Access Protection and Black Hole Router Detection.

SP3 will also give users even more incentive to stick with the venerable operating system which has soldiered on since late 2001. Many consumers and businesses have clung to the operating system despite the fact that Microsoft has heavily pushed its newer Windows Vista operating system.

Microsoft is hoping for a swift switchover to Windows Vista and has already announced a June 30 end-of-life date for Windows XP (with the exception of Windows XP Home for ultra-low-cost PCs. Some PC manufacturers, however, are using other methods to extend the availability of Windows XP for its customers.



Comments     Threshold


Not a big fan
By Samus on 4/29/2008 6:27:44 AM , Rating: 1
I think SP3 cripples XP just enough to make Balmer's comments seem justified. You can't even drag and drop network files to your local PC because of new restrictions, which don't even exist in Vista.

Steve, if the security improvements in SP3 are so important, why aren't they implemented in Vista? What are you trying to say? This only goes one way.

Basically anyone who's smart enough to read Anandtech is smart enough to not need any 'features' in SP3.

Virtually everyone here shouldn't bother.




RE: Not a big fan
By Polynikes on 4/29/2008 7:18:39 AM , Rating: 2
I hadn't really paid close attention to the "feature"-set; perhaps I'll skip this one.


RE: Not a big fan
By Nihility on 4/29/2008 7:28:55 AM , Rating: 1
I'm just glad they didn't add UAC to XP


RE: Not a big fan
By 306maxi on 4/29/2008 9:09:41 AM , Rating: 3
There is an off button for UAC. But clueless tards like yourself would rather spread FUD than actually help anyone annoyed by UAC by telling them how to switch it off.


RE: Not a big fan
By Polynikes on 4/29/2008 9:58:25 AM , Rating: 3
Just because it can be turned off doesn't mean it's not a terrible design decision.

http://www.dailytech.com/Microsoft+Designed+Vistas...


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/29/2008 10:25:03 AM , Rating: 2
UAC in and of it's self I like, what I don't is some of the things MS just generically auto prompts. Like always prompting for an installer is a bad idea, terrible one in fact. Microsoft kind of compramised their elevation system by doing this, all in the name of changing user habbits.

They should have installers automatically run at your permission levels and only ask for an elivation if it's going to start modifying a critical area of the system which could compramise windows as a whole. The registry for instance, or drop stuff into the windows DIR etc.

Not only would this go along way to helping eliminate spyware (for real) but it would also go along way towards discouraging developers from using stuff like the registry needlessly.


RE: Not a big fan
By Chadder007 on 4/29/2008 10:41:26 AM , Rating: 5
I wish they would get rid of the registry all together.
Each program should be individually contained and not this clusterf@* that spreads into your system that it is now.


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/29/2008 10:49:44 AM , Rating: 3
The registry... Decent idea gone horribly wrong due to microsoft not locking out 3rd party developers... I think the registry should be replaced with a system which locks out 3rd party developers, at least eventually. Unfortunetly Microsoft can't just drop the registry at this point, people are complaining enough about vista compatibility issues with out Microsoft completely murduring support for an over whelming majority of relivent applications out on the market today.


RE: Not a big fan
By JustTom on 4/29/2008 11:34:38 AM , Rating: 5
Right, because whenever MS locks out 3rd parties no regulatory body complains.


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/29/2008 11:47:50 AM , Rating: 3
Why would developers compain about being locked out of the registry if API's were provided to access requried window's settings? What legitimate need to developers need access to the registry for other than to create a huge honking mess or hide malware on a PC?


RE: Not a big fan
By JustTom on 4/30/2008 1:01:22 AM , Rating: 2
Because locking them out of the registry would remove the need for registry cleaners/optimizers. While this in itself is nonsensical MS does not have many friends in the regulatory community.


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/30/2008 1:11:16 AM , Rating: 2
I guess I see your point, though my POV with all this (and generally towards European regulators) is cry me a freaking river...


RE: Not a big fan
By TomZ on 4/29/2008 3:52:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I wish they would get rid of the registry all together.

Yes, I know I would prefer to have hundreds of configuration files scattered across the drive - NOT.

The registry has its pros and cons - there is nothing so obviously wrong with it. It is just a tool like any other, and it can be used in both constructive and destructive ways. It is only "evil" if you are being simple about it.

I personally prefer the registry compared to a large proliferation of configuration files like we had before the registry. At least the registry can be centrally managed, backed up, etc.


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/29/2008 5:34:20 PM , Rating: 2
The problem now is 3rd party developers screwing up the system... Something has to be done about them, perhaps a seperate hive from the main windows one? Who knows, but it's really become a mess unfortunately.


RE: Not a big fan
By TomZ on 4/29/2008 6:16:09 PM , Rating: 2
I guess I'm not sure I understand the problem. The intention of the registry is that 3rd party developers are supposed to program their apps to store configuration information into the registry. Each 3rd party app has its own area following the format:

\<HKCU|HKLM>\Software\<company-name>\ <app-name>

If some apps are doing other things with the registry, then they should be be banished from being installed on your machine. :o)

Seriously, though, I've never really come across a problem with some app messing up my machine because of doing something inappropriate in the registry. Obviously adware/malware/viruses/etc. would be a different story, but if you've got those running on your machine, then you've got bigger problems than the registry.

What kind of registry problems are you seeing?


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/30/2008 1:10:24 AM , Rating: 2
None recently, but I have delt with registry corruption in the past due to bad code mismanaging registry key's... I.E. modifying system registry values then when you uninstall the application failing to restore them to their original state. We're not even talking malware here, the intetion wasn't malitious, the developers just sucked that's all there is to it.

That's why I would love to see at the very least a system registry as a seperate entity from an applications registry. Keep lazy developers from screwing up things they ought not be touching in the first place.


RE: Not a big fan
By Samus on 4/30/2008 6:06:41 AM , Rating: 2
People who don't like the registry simply don't understand it. It's about as good as MS can make it, and it isn't likely to change. It's been around since Windows 3.1 for the most part in original form. You should know it quite well by now.


RE: Not a big fan
By Locutus465 on 4/30/2008 10:23:55 AM , Rating: 2
People who do like it probably never found them selves in a situation where it's been misused by a software developer. I understand how old the current registry design is and it's purpose, it's time for a change. It's time to stop allowing direct access to critical system settings found in the registry. There are any number of ways this can be accomplished. Just because a particular design worked for WFW 3.11 doesn't mean it's still just as good a design for the vista era.


RE: Not a big fan
By TomZ on 4/30/2008 7:35:12 PM