backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by InsaneScientis.. on Mar 28 at 1:39 PM


Power Pack 2 brings new wizards to Windows Home Server, which warn if remote connectivity will fail due to lack of UPnP support in your router.  (Source: Windows SuperSite)

PP2 also allows streamed high-definition content at last, allowing users to stream high-definition video or lossless audio to devices like the XBox 360 or Windows 7 PCs.  (Source: Windows SuperSite)
Windows Home Server PP2 adds high-def streaming, improved remote connectivity, and much more

Many have contemplated putting together a home server network to streamline their storage and other tasks, but have been wary to do so for lack of a beginner-level hardware/software solution.  When Microsoft Home Server first debuted, it aimed to provide exactly that.  And after being initially crippled by file corruption issues, last year brought a fix to these issues in the form of the July Power Pack 1 update which helped WHS finally start to realize its promise.

The WHS team has been hard at work since and today they will release the sum of their efforts, WHS Power Pack 2.  Like other Power Packs (PPs) it bears a resemblance to the professional Windows Server and PC Windows Service Packs (SPs), in that it packages bug fixes and minor improvements.  While is certainly not a major release, it does deliver some key improvements, that users or potential customers will certainly appreciate.

One of the key improvements that the PP2 brings is to streamline the setup or out-of-box experience (OOBE).  The update reduces the setup stems from 23 to 13.  For seasoned users, it brings an improved SDK to develop for WHS.

Remote access is one key focus of PP2.  WHS already featured remote access capabilities, allowing you to connect while away from home to your server's administrative controls, shared files, and networked computers.  However, the technology relied on UPnP, which many routers don't support -- so many users were out of luck.

While WHS PP2 doesn't change the communication scheme from UPnP, it does offer new connectivity wizards.  One eliminates the annoyance of configuring remote access and thinking it’s working, only to discover it’s not.  The new wizard tests the remote connection, allowing the user to know whether their router supports UPnP, or if a return might be in order.  Router detection/configuration has also improved and the Remote Access section of the admin console's Settings window has been streamlined as well.

Another key focus of PP2 is media sharing.  One key improvement is the addition of new Windows Media Center (WMC) features.  Media Center users in the past could not "see" by default their network shares, and had to go through relatively complex steps to make them visible.  PP2 brings the Windows Media Center Connector, which automatically adds the server-side Music, Photos, Videos, and Recorded TV folders to the appropriate locations in WMC.

From there you can stream content to devices like the Xbox 360 via Windows Media Center Extenders (MCXs).  Content flows from your server to you WMC PC, then into the extender device.  The extenders group can be configured with folder-by-folder permissions (Full, read or none) (though one desirable feature, permissions by extender, still is not implemented).

Perhaps most important, though, PP2 allows you to stream high-definition MPEG-4 media formats content at last, including H.264 video and AAC audio files.  As the Xbox 360 already supports these formats, you now have the tools need to create an easy high-definition streamed content network.

WHS PP2 is available today on Windows Update.  Initially it will only be available in English, but Chinese, French, German, Japanese and Spanish versions will be available by the end of April. 

In related news, Microsoft has opened up WHS for free download by developers.  The soon-to-be-available OS download should help spur even more improvements to WHS.  In summary -- things are looking up for Microsoft's Windows Home Server.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Very nice Powerpack
By SunAngel on 3/24/2009 9:40:20 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Many have contemplated putting together a home server network to streamline their storage and other tasks


Currently, the best value for Microsoft Home Server is the HP Media Smart Servers (even if you do have odd hardware sitting in the garage).




RE: Very nice Powerpack
By VooDooAddict on 3/24/2009 10:12:00 AM , Rating: 3
Agreed. The HP unit is very good value for the $$. And the newer units even come with ample RAM.

I've tried and I can't build anything with the capability and size of the HP unit. I can come close with internal only HDs. But the HP unit allows easy external tray access to all system drives.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By Bateluer on 3/24/2009 10:35:40 AM , Rating: 3
I already had an Inspiron 531 with an X2 3800 and 2GB of RAM in it for WHS. It only has space for two hdds, unfortunately, but it was half the price of the cheapest MediaSmart box.

I've been very impressed with Windows Home Server, now that the corruption issue has been resolved.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By stephenfs on 3/24/2009 10:52:42 AM , Rating: 3
I built my own also, and am very happy with it. I played with it endlessly for the first month or so. I love having every pc backed up daily and being able to choose how far back I want to go if I need to restore a drive. And it is handy to have easy share folders that are duplicated on 2 separate drives. And it is easy to set up, which is increasingly important as I would rather spend time with my kids.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By VooDooAddict on 3/24/2009 12:31:58 PM , Rating: 3
This isn't to say you can't build your own or get good value out of it...

but for a pre-built I feel the HP unit is a good value.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By Spivonious on 3/24/2009 10:47:45 AM , Rating: 2
I'm using my old P4 system as the server and the 120-day trial of WHS (runs out in April). Total cost to me: $0. That's a good value. :P

Seriously though, the P4 2.4Ghz with 1GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive is plenty of steam for running a glorified file server.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By therealnickdanger on 3/24/2009 10:48:39 AM , Rating: 2
I recently built a dual-core Atom 330 micro-ITX server using WHS and it runs very, very well! Altogether it cost ~$350 to build (and yes, that includes paying for WHS). These are very welcome additions!


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By Doormat on 3/24/2009 2:51:49 PM , Rating: 2
The HP boxes even let you back up your Macs to the WHS server via Time Machine. Normally you have to shell out $$$$ on a Time Capsule to get that same functionality.

I have a shuttle box as my WHS. Cant wait to install powerpack 2. The H.264 streaming is a huge win, I can now removed the hack I had to enable it before. Not really sure about the rest of the features, as I haven't had many problems. I would have liked to see a function to stream music (and possibly videos in the future using silverlight 3) over the internet when I'm out of the house.


RE: Very nice Powerpack
By SunAngel on 3/24/2009 4:17:28 PM , Rating: 2
already available...its called Webguide.

if Webguide can used the h.264 codec microsoft has included in the OS, then webguide is now the ultimate for streaming across the internet (it works pretty well as-is though).


Free for developers? Not exactly.
By Spivonious on 3/24/2009 11:36:08 AM , Rating: 2
You'll still need an MSDN subscription to get it, at least according to Paul Thurrott.




RE: Free for developers? Not exactly.
By JasonMick (blog) on 3/24/2009 11:44:36 AM , Rating: 1
I think that's a rather moot point as the number of Windows developers *without* an MSDN/TechNet subscriptions I'd wager to say is pretty low (maybe a few kids who can't pay for one?). I'm sure that would affect a handful of developers, but for most it *will* be free (as they're subscribers).

And that's a pretty cool thing, and a smart move by Microsoft IMO if it wants to spur WHS adoption.


RE: Free for developers? Not exactly.
By TomZ on 3/24/2009 11:52:32 AM , Rating: 2
Many developers I know are using older versions of Visual Studio Pro without MSDN. I would guess far less than 100% of Windows developers own their own MSDN license.


RE: Free for developers? Not exactly.
By Spivonious on 3/24/2009 12:38:25 PM , Rating: 2
None of the devs at my company have direct access to an MSDN subscription. The company is not going to pay us to develop for Windows Home Server.

I don't think it's moot at all. I'd wager that most devs interested in developing for WHS are hobbyists that don't want to blow $2000+ on a subscription.


By InsaneScientist on 3/28/2009 1:39:23 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I don't think it's moot at all. I'd wager that most devs interested in developing for WHS are hobbyists that don't want to blow $2000+ on a subscription.


$2000? A Technet Plus Direct subscription is $350 for the first year and every year thereafter it's $250.

Furthermore, the ones who can't afford to pay $2000 for whatever are also going to be the ones who can't afford separate test machines... Which means that your main box(es) are what you're using for development and testing purposes, and therefore you can justify using the software from technet on them, rather than full retail copies... so they're more likely to save money from a technet subscription (possibly quite a lot of money) than spend more.


WTF is "high-def" streaming?
By consumerwhore on 3/24/2009 1:33:24 PM , Rating: 3
Can somebody explain to me what does it matter to the server OS if the file I'm sending over WiFi is a 720p video file or 480p video file? You would think the client apps receiving the file would be the only one concerned about that...




RE: WTF is "high-def" streaming?
By ViRGE on 3/24/2009 8:48:52 PM , Rating: 2
The OS doesn't care, someone got their wires crossed. The only new thing is that previously the server couldn't parse MP4 containers to stream them, now it can.


Here's an interesting question
By InternetGeek on 3/25/2009 1:31:48 AM , Rating: 2
What support is thre in WHS to run other servers you develop/get from the internet?

One usage I see for this (it might decide whether I buy one or not) is to run my own VSS/Subversion server separate from my workstations (laptops) at home. I wonder if I can do such thing with WHS.




RE: Here's an interesting question
By v3rt1g0 on 3/25/2009 4:36:22 AM , Rating: 2
I run VisualSVN (Subversion) on mine. No problems.
For most intents and purposes, WHS is Windows Server 2003.


By jimbojimbo on 3/26/2009 12:10:44 PM , Rating: 2
Around once a week or so my WHS would come up with file conflict errors which basically results in a lost file, even if you have it duplicated. You then had to reboot to "fix" it which meant deleting the original file since after the scan disk it'll make that file an empty file.

I LOVE the way WHS handles storage, being able to plop in assorted disk sizes and having one gigantic volume, but until I know those file conflict errors are resolved my WHS box will sit on the shelf.




Wrong name
By Ammohunt on 3/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: Wrong name
By TomZ on 3/24/2009 4:13:35 PM , Rating: 2
WHS has a lot more features besides backup.


RE: Wrong name
By v3rt1g0 on 3/24/2009 5:11:35 PM , Rating: 2
Windows Home Server is the best bang for the buck Windows offering out there, imnsho.

I paid a measly $140 for fully automated backup of every Windows machine on my network, zero-hassle storage management/redundancy over several drive sizes/interfaces, remote file/machine access, content streaming (wmc/tversity), and aside from ad/domain/isa support, it's a functioning copy of Windows Server 2003. It's a great value.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton




Latest Headlines










botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki